Revol68:
you do realise there is no point arguing with a fanny like that?
Thanks for proving me right: you are the only one emitting crudities around here.
That's quite apart from the fact that not even you have taken your own advice.
First you made things up about me, and then when you were exposed as a liar, you tried to 'argue' with me (in fluent Martian) -- but you were soon sent away with your tail between your legs.
Rosa is more than a match for a wimp like you.
Have a nice fume....
Gator:
Fine, but then you will only be able to describe nature with a new, and obscure, convention, but not be able to explain anything.
This is no explanation (even if it were coherent), but, once more, a re-description set out in a new convention.
No, it's called 'being qualified'.
You'll be saying next that anyone can do brain surgery or design a satellite system.
But even if you were right, I'd still prefer their account of nature to that of a rank amateur, armchair superscientist, who never quite manages to carry out any experiments.