RosaL says I "fibbed." Presumably she means that one of my descriptions of her viewpoint is mistaken. If she thinks that, the appropriate response is to show that i was mistaken by explaining how i was mistaken. If my description was false, she can't know it was a "lie" -- an intentional falsehood -- unless she is claiming powers of mental telepathy.
I refer the honorable fibber to my previous response.
But now we have exhibit C fro the proesecution:
Oh, but this is a problem for Rosa since she rejects structural elements of explanations such as economic structures and tendencies.