Thought experiment - riots in france

60 replies [Last post]
User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12-09-04

Here's a tought for size - the paris riots thread hasn't really allowed for much analysis, but as this is the biggest 'event' in the European class struggle for a wee while, and I'm not saying that from some crude 'they're rioting, we're winning' Socialist Voice type perspecti, just that it is an event of great magnitude, we had better startthinking about it together.

So to start things off in some way here is one perspective (which I don't really agree with, but which I'm positing to promote discussion).

-----Now that lots of disadvantaged, socially excluded people are rioting in towns and cities across France our task is to be in those communities doing whatever we can to broaden the riots, to encourage people to leave the banlieus amd start trashing Paris. Socialists should be setting up organisations to try and push a more directly poliitical assault on the civil administration and police in France. We should be trying to push the police out of our communities in an organised fashion and should be defying curfews by setting up barricades and encouraging people to take on the police by whatever means at their disposal, while at the same time removing the provision of services from the civil authorities and replacing it with the community etc.-------

Ok so you get the gist of this perspective (which for Revol and the rest of the trolls' benefit i don't hold) and I could go on but I'm sure you could fil in the blanks.

It just sort of concerns me that on the UK's number one communist networking tool there wasn't an immediate analysis made publically by anyone about whether or not we should be doing something about these developments, e.g. the merits or otherwise about getting the next flight to Paris etc..

Joined: 17-12-04

I was kind of under the impression these riots were being in a way co-ordinated by some Muslim extremists, of which I'm sure there are plenty in france. Thats not to say a lot of disenfranchised youth who have had to deal with shit lives in these banilieus have been drawn to these riots under non religious reasons. I may sound like a naieve dick but just not sure how much of the media to believe and what this spreading of violence is like... There are a lot of right wing fucks in France as well and they could also very possibly be involved in starting a few fires in small towns to stoke and muslim and anti north african sentiment....

Im just confused bout these riots in general

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

No it's a genuine expression of working class anger that must be unconditionally supported AT ALL COSTS.

Lazy Riser's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 33 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6-05-05

Hi

Unlike Jack, I'm not willing to make any sacrifices for the French rioters, but that counts in their favour in my book. I certainly think they should be encouraged, especially from the safe distance of my comfy chair.

What is the prevailing view of the French working class? Perhaps some trusted French comrades would enlighten us.

I must say, I'm somewhat surprised at the extreme poverty visited upon these people by the French bourgeoisie. What model of social provision is it they so proudly defend? Could this happen in Norway? I’m not so sure.

I’m thinking this is this what Castoriadis meant by “barbarism”. Riots are the perfect compliment to right wing legislatures. At the heart of this unrest lies Franco-German market-Stalinist economic policy, and it’s effect on the money supply and the real incomes of the poorest sections of the French working class.

Euro-scepticism is all that separates the Franco-German rightists from our own Tories. If only they had shared our own rightists' xenophobia, they might have seen just how dangerous monetary union is. France’s reaction is certainly shaped by EU rules on public spending and subsidy.

And look at the French middle class reaction. It’s absurd that this takes place against the backdrop of France’s renowned 35-hour week leisure economy. “Hello Laziness”, indeed. I’ll certainly be taking Corinne Maier with an extra pinch of salt from now on.

Capital is failing us everywhere and violent flashpoints are inevitable and positive. Jack, what social policy proposal do you make in relation to these events? Universal citizen’s income and professional self-management?

Love

LR

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

No, as an anarchist, I see my duty as being to abandon all critical faculty, and instead get a huge erection at the sight of people (often not even white!) burning cars and fighting the police, and thus support them totally and uncritically with little to no idea or analysis as to what is going on.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05

poor little jack, waiting around for the perfect fight, because life's like that, nice and neat

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

Yea man, because anyone who is fighting against the state is inherently good, and should be supported 100% uncritically. roll eyes

To even examine the consequences of the riot or make up of those involved is CROSSING CLASS LINES.

And saying that you 'support the rioters unconditionally' isn't at all a stupid oversimplification, reducing a complex phenomina to ridiculous and over simplified phrase-mongering.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05

one day, that perfect fight will come eh

who said they support them unconditionally, not i

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

Class War Federation and many other anarchists have. I wasn't aiming it at you, you know. As much as I dislike you, I'd (for some reason) expected you to have a marginally more reasoned position on this.

Where exactly have I said or even implied I'm 'waiting for the perfect fight'? Please back that up.

There's a difference between not getting a massive boner over anyone burning cars and waiting for some form of pure struggle. It's ridiculous Trot wank, ffs, it's the same shit they come out with as to why we should support the IRA/The Resistance/the NLF etc. etc.

I'm not saying the situation is the same, but the argument is just as shit, and I'm not going to instantly fall behind in support of anyone who is 'fighting the state'.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05
Jack wrote:
Where exactly have I said or even implied I'm 'waiting for the perfect fight'? Please back that up.

you havn't said it, but it's implied by your disdain for any form of action anywhere by anybody, that info is clear to see from anyone reading these boards

anyone doing anything at g8, anyone doing something to stop the closure of a bus station involving being on it's roof for more than a day (oh the irony), anyone doing anything environmental (again, oh the irony), any kind of action against police, whether in paris or outside whetherspoons, regardless of the original fuckwitted reason for the incident, you said you wouldn't adopt the type of protest by the bus station rooft top protestors, as it would get in the way of your job, it's not a massive leap then to assume you'd never engage in anything like secondary (or even primary) strike action, as it get in the way of your job and perhaps stop you buying "stuff", you talk from the front and lead from the back on most issues

all these things suggest to me, and i may well be wrong, that you're waiting for the perfect fight before you do anything, and that in itself gives you a perfect reason for doing nothing, nothing but criticise that is

i have all the same reservations that you do about a lot of these areas, it's not your actual anlaysis that i don't like it's your high minded, mighty, pretentious, self righteous, know it all, po faced disdain that you treat all around you who happen to view things not exactly the same as you do, you're no better than those mad islamists who think that everyone apart from themselves should be killed as only they have the right and pure way

you keep on fetishing over the perfect fight if you like, but the only place that'll ever happen is in your head

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 2 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05

that's a fair point catch..

Lazy Riser's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 33 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6-05-05

Hi

The rioters are the Left of Capital. Jack's right not to support them. I expect the ICC will join him in condemnation, as will Cohn-Bendit. I like to get a Bendit in when I can.

Marie Antoinette wrote:
Let them eat cake.
Daniel Cohn-Bendit wrote:
No one has dared tell the French left that we live in a world of market forces.
Corinne Maier wrote:
Let them eat cake.

Serves them right for shooting sparrows. Can we ban irony?

LR

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 2 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06
Quote:
ere's a tought for size - the paris riots thread hasn't really allowed for much analysis, but as this is the biggest 'event' in the European class struggle for a wee while, and I'm not saying that from some crude 'they're rioting, we're winning' Socialist Voice type perspecti, just that it is an event of great magnitude, we had better startthinking about it together.

Nick, my own view on this is that from our point of view we should try to understand these events as much as possible. That's incredibly difficult when much of the news reporting is very superficial. Most importantly it'd be useful to locate primary sources for what's going on. Very little of that has been forthcoming from either mainstream or left wing/independent/anarcho sources so far.

From my point of view, what's unusual about it is how it has continued to spread geographically (both into smaller towns, and across national boundaries) - something that rarely happens, and that it's continued to escalate in intensity in Paris (at least until last night). The important thing in terms of this is to look at the composition of the rioters (both within Paris, and across France), and what networks of communication, if any, have been set up. Shame my French is so shit.

There have been murmerings of a metro strike in Paris - presumably on H&S grounds - anything news relating to that would be useful.

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03
oisleep wrote:
anyone doing anything at g8

Yep.

Quote:
anyone doing something to stop the closure of a bus station involving being on it's roof for more than a day (oh the irony)

I don't get the irony?

Quote:
anyone doing anything environmental (again, oh the irony)

Ah, I see, you're just lying, then. Gotcha.

Quote:
any kind of action against police, whether in paris or outside whetherspoons, regardless of the original fuckwitted reason for the incident

Right, so some piece of shit bringing a sound system into a Wetherspoons is synonymous with the riots in Paris? roll eyes

I've said I'm against the riots in Paris, have I?

The only form of action people can take 'against the police' is violent assault?

You're going to have to start backing this up, you know.

Just because the police defend capital doesn't mean that any and all action taken against them is good, or should be defended.

Quote:
you said you wouldn't adopt the type of protest by the bus station rooft top protestors, as it would get in the way of your job, it's not a massive leap then to assume you'd never engage in anything like secondary (or even primary) strike action, as it get in the way of your job and perhaps stop you buying "stuff"

Uh, yes. It is. A fucking HUGE leap. There's a VAST difference between a bunch of hippies sitting on a roof and strike action. It's not even comparable. Of course I'd support secondary action because it's proven to be effective, helps to build up wider class solidarity, and to be blunt, is worth losing a job for. None of this applies to sitting on the roof of a bus station martyring yourself in an elitist quasi-leninist attempt to be the vanguard that saves your local bus station. I'd rather try do it in a manner that engages as many people as possible - not just those willing /able to spend weeks on a fucking cold roof.

Quote:
all these things suggest to me, and i may well be wrong, that you're waiting for the perfect fight before you do anything, and that in itself gives you a perfect reason for doing nothing, nothing but criticise that is

Whereas, of course, I should be getting involved with and mindlessly supporting anything that is against anything 'bad', no matter what the make up of those doing it, whether it can have any effect, whether it's realistic etc. etc. then? Is that the sort of politics you want to build a mass movement around? roll eyes

Quote:
i have all the same reservations that you do about a lot of these areas, it's not your actual anlaysis that i don't like it's your high minded, mighty, pretentious, self righteous, know it all, po faced disdain that you treat all around you who happen to view things not exactly the same as you do

Yea, good point, what I should be doing on message boards is sucking everyones cock and saying how great they're doing and that everything they do, no matter how pointless is brilliant, because at least they're doing something.

Quote:
you're no better than those mad islamists who think that everyone apart from themselves should be killed as only they have the right and pure way

Actually, you're kind of right on this, and I felt this way myself the other day as I was cutting off WSM members heads.

Quote:
you keep on fetishing over the perfect fight if you like, but the only place that'll ever happen is in your head

Except I don't. I'm just not going to rush into uncritically supporting some riotting just because it's directed at the police. That alone doesn't make it worth supporting. It's also a totally bogus argument - most of the stuff I've been involved in has been far from 'perfect' - anti-war campaigns with Trots, liberals and anarchists, a bus station campaign which had a petition as a major part of its focus etc. etc. Doesn't mean I'm not going to criticise utterly pointless crap like G8 protests or hold off on declarations of undying support for the riots, tho.

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12-09-04

guys give jack a break - yes he's being a pretentious tosser and arguing with posts that nobody has actually made and yes he's derailing a thread but we know he does this. he's well meaning enough. he's not revol.

Very interesting to hear about the metro strike catch... I appreciate a lot of people find the comparison crass but it's not like this hasn't happened before. i think we should be keeping a very close eye on events there especially because of France's massive role in the world economy and her place in the forthcoming world war at the helm of the EU.

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 2 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06

there hasn't actually been a strike afaik:

Quote:

Thursday November 3 - Traffic was halted on the RER B suburban commuter line which links Paris to Charles de Gaulle airport after unions called for a strike. Rioters attacked two trains overnight at the Le Blanc-Mesnil station, forced a conductor from one train and broke windows, the SNCF rail authority said.

http://www.babnet.net/en_detail.asp?id=1641

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03
Nick Durie wrote:
guys give jack a break - yes he's being a pretentious tosser and arguing with posts that nobody has actually made

You haven't read any anarcho posts about the riots at all, then?

Just as a taster - http://www.londonclasswar.org/French.pdf

Quote:
and yes he's derailing a thread but we know he does this.

No I'm not. This time. The derail came from oisleeps attack on me, after I mocked the ridiculous and deeply embarassing 'analysis' of the riots made by most anarchists. As an example, can you really read most of the posts here- http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=138703 and not cringe?

You might not like revol, but he's clearly and almost undisputably one of the few people talking anything approaching sense there. The rest of the anarchist responce is almost as embarassing as Hakim Bey.

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03
Lazy Riser wrote:
Jack's right not to support them. I expect the ICC will join him in condemnation

I haven't condemed them, have I? It is possible to neither support nor condem something, you know.

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12-09-04

doesn't necessarily mean that they believe it jack. Sometimes situations arise where a wee white lie is an interesting propaganda opportunity. For instance i don't believe that tenant power caused the GHA to backtrack on its plans to scrap nightime concierge, altho it was a factor.

Every tenant I speak to however, at least where i think it will wash, i will say it was the major factor, afterall I don't actually know it wasn't. At this stage in the class war we need good news stories.

That said that pamphlet wasn't the best, but you certainly didn't explain the context behind your comments, and if you had then perhaps others might have been a little less likely to fail to see your side of the argument.

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03
Nick Durie wrote:
That said that pamphlet wasn't the best, but you certainly didn't explain the context behind your comments, and if you had then perhaps others might have been a little less likely to fail to see your side of the argument.

I'm sure most of the people reading this (certainly everyone who posted after me, apart from perhaps Lazy Riser) has seen the sorts of comments about 'unconditional support' and the like anarchos have been making on these forums and elsewhere. It wasn't a matter of not getting the context.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05
Jack wrote:

No I'm not. This time. The derail came from oisleeps attack on me, after I mocked the ridiculous and deeply embarassing 'analysis' of the riots made by most anarchists.

granted, however you started an attack on something other people have said elsewhere, i.e. not on this thread

what did that add to the discourse attempted on this thread by nick?

nada

you latch on to something you don't like and permeate all discussions with it, regardless of whether it is relevant or not to the discussion in hand, instead of actually dealing with the topic in hand, you just revert back to bitching at things that no one on this thread has actually said, why not deal with what's said here rather than what someone wrote on urban75 confused

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

I (and I think pretty fairly) assumed that when Nick said:

Quote:
-----Now that lots of disadvantaged, socially excluded people are rioting in towns and cities across France our task is to be in those communities doing whatever we can to broaden the riots, to encourage people to leave the banlieus amd start trashing Paris. Socialists should be setting up organisations to try and push a more directly poliitical assault on the civil administration and police in France. We should be trying to push the police out of our communities in an organised fashion and should be defying curfews by setting up barricades and encouraging people to take on the police by whatever means at their disposal, while at the same time removing the provision of services from the civil authorities and replacing it with the community etc.-------

He was referencing this attitude/position.

He asked for opinions on the position, I gave them.

And anyway, whatever one feels about supporting it, I'm sure we could come to a rare form of agreement that any UK anarchos who flew over to Paris for some riot fun would be total dickheads.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 20-04-05

i agree, why fly to paris when eurostar is much more convenient!

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

roll eyes

User offline. Last seen 1 hour 9 min ago. Offline
Joined: 9-02-06

Isn't it possible that the rioting has several causes?

Its obvious Sarkozy provoked a conflict, therefore he felt he had something to gain. Presumably that is greater police powers and the cowing of the people on the estates. I reckon French anarchos should get out there to make sure that islamists and 'community leaders' don't use this for their own benefit. Although there seems to be little evidence of that, its what seems to happen here, some prick with the right coloured skin claims to be a representative of the community and gets himself a nice pay off.

The riots will stop, they are making enough arrests, it might take as long as a month but they will stop unless this turns into a revolution, which is unlikely. I think it would be a good thing if anarchists went there and discussed anarchism and anti-authoritarianism.

BTW LR French people are only lazy because they realise that they are being robbed of the fruits of their labour. Also the 35 hour week would create more jobs and would lead to fewer modern day servants working cash in hand for those poor pressed 'cash rich time poor' people.

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 17-06-05

It's correct to support the rioters. To find reasons not to is just the kind of splitting hairs timewasting that stops any progress. The state spends little time splitting hairs, it knows it's interests and acts coldly to carry them through to the result it wants. Of course there may be a reactionary Islamic element to the rioting but it is I think the most significant event in Europe for the struggle for a while and must be utilised.

red n black star

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
RedCelt wrote:
It's correct to support the rioters. To find reasons not to is just the kind of splitting hairs timewasting that stops any progress. The state spends little time splitting hairs, it knows it's interests and acts coldly to carry them through to the result it wants. Of course there may be a reactionary Islamic element to the rioting but it is I think the most significant event in Europe for the struggle for a while and must be utilised.

red n black star

hmm i don't think a islamic elements have feck all to do with it, and is certainly not what is splitting my hairs.

I stand in solidarity with the spirit of the majority of rioters, but at the same time it's hardly splitting hairs to point out the short comings of such tactics and some of the negative outcomes.

But yes the general attitude of the rioters is rather awesome, "we hate france and france hates us", "we live in shitholes, we hate it here", and they're far to savvy to be taken in by the islamic or nationalists fuckwits talking about an islamic paradise or a return to algeria.

User is online Online
Joined: 13-10-05
Jack wrote:
No, as an anarchist, I see my duty as being to abandon all critical faculty, and instead get a huge erection at the sight of people (often not even white!) burning cars and fighting the police, and thus support them totally and uncritically with little to no idea or analysis as to what is going on.

me too! twisted

User offline. Last seen 3 days 16 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 12-03-05
Quote:
No, as an anarchist, I see my duty as being to abandon all critical faculty, and instead get a huge erection at the sight of people (often not even white!) burning cars and fighting the police

I cannot express how big my erection is about these riots - I'm getting phone calls from air traffic control about it, the met office is saying that it's interfering with weather patterns. This is exciting - a fairly spontaneous outbreak of class anger in response to a specific provocation is sustaining itself and spreading. How is that not fucking exciting? To have kept going this long there must be some organisation developing behind this which might, with any luck, make itself felt after the violence has ended. It might be coopted, or it might just be smashed, but it has to be there.

Yeah, of course anyone that leapt on a plane now to get some riot action would be a dick, but that doesn't mean that we should just sit back and 'engage our critical faculties' - some of us can walk and think at the same time. That Class War leaflet was crap (mostly because it wasn't funny when it thought it was), but what it was trying to do is essential - we have to be interpreting this and getting that out in the face of what's passing for reporting on this and if that means declaring support for something despite its ambiguities then that's fine by me.

Sometimes sitting on the fence is not engaging your critical faculties, it's refusing to engage at all.

User is online Online
Joined: 13-10-05
ticking_fool wrote:
class anger

is that what it is?