hi Samuel, welcome to the boards!
i don't know if i have an opinion on street art in general any more than art in general 
if its done well or makes me laugh it can be good, and i certainly have no problem with 'detourning' corporate property. I suppose a downside is that people may tend to associate radical politics with 'vandals', but again i suppose how well its done determines that. I don't know if it relates to libertarian philosophy much, although you could argue its a form of reappropriating public space i suppose ...
Sometimes people just need a break from all of this political noise ya know? Beautifying an area is just as important to street art as conveying a political message. The world needs more of that......


)
) .

Hello all. I was wondering what people on this site think about steet art (i.e. stencils, posters, etc). I'll give you a brief summary of my thoughts on the subject.
). I see it as a way to take back an area that was bought out by corporate fat cats. So what are your opinions on street art and how it's a part of a libertarian philosophy? Agree or disagree, I would like to know what you think. This is my first post as a libcom member, by the way.
I myself am a street artist. I do not damage personal property of people, I do not resort to that sort of mindless vandalism. I like to find a rich, corporate area and put up a nice political stencil. I don't put up anything like "fuck the police," I pride myself on conveying my message in a more intelligent way. Stencils can get people thinking. Thats what I like about it, the placement is everything (I live in the home of KFC headquarters, perfect target