Should the black/green smiley be brough back to it's rightful place?

Yes (women should be seen and not heard anyway!)
44% (16 votes)
No (cos I'm not a misogynist nob!)
56% (20 votes)
Total votes: 36

Posted By

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 15:11

Tags

Share

Attached files

Comments

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:02

Ive seen every south park episode until the new season 8 ones.

...and I know most of the scripts eek

I doubt that episode name is the real name. Are you talking about the rainforest episode or the "biggest douche in the universe episode"? confused

AnarchoAl
Jan 31 2005 17:03

It's season 8, it's the real name.

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:04

Wow gettin to deep philosophical questions here.

So revol do you believe there is no such thing as an unselfish act ("you dick"! roll eyes )??

AnarchoAl
Jan 31 2005 17:05

Does it seem a bit sad to anyone else that we're having an almost realtime conversation on a bulletin board?

(btw the "outside world looks down on a man marrying a lama" is a quote from douche and turd... it's a very anarcho episode, anti-voting and it features PETA)

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:05

Oh OK I haven't seen any season 8.

Green doesnt mean primitivist Jack. But for the sake of this argument it would probably be funnier if it did.

revol68
Jan 31 2005 17:06

no but i do believe that there is no value outside of experiance or self awareness.

AnarchoAl
Jan 31 2005 17:07

Human blatantly don't act out of pure self interest. My evidence comes from Buddhist philosophy and personal experiences of depression... often people choose to be unhappy. This is an observable truth, especially in the case of depression where you can be so far gone you don't want to be happy. Try to justify choosing to be unhappy as self-interest.

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:10
revol68 wrote:
no but i do believe that there is no value outside of experiance or self awareness.

So then, my argument still stands. Greens rule and reds drool cos greens want animals and the enviroment to be OK for non-selfish reasons whereas reds just want more furniture and farms and stuff.

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:10
Jack wrote:
Lazlo_Woodbine wrote:

Oh fuck off Lazlo, you stupid fucking hippy shit, OBVIOUSLY an abomination like that could ONLY result from nuclear contamination.

Technology 1 - No technology 0.

The chemicals in ur earphones have rotted your brain! U clearly know fuck all about the real Swamp Thing

"an entirely nonhuman "plant elemental" created by the Earth itself" according to Alan Moore -- author of possibly the finest anarchist comic ever: V for Vendetta

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:12

Want to blow up Fascists?

Vote for the Green Star!!

revol68
Jan 31 2005 17:13

3rd ur position is based on essentially living in an urban environment, if u lived in a fucking jungle u migth start thinking of animals more instrumentally.

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:13
Jack wrote:
3rdseason wrote:

Green doesnt mean primitivist Jack. But for the sake of this argument it would probably be funnier if it did.

Shut the fuck up 3rd, or my nuclear abomination will eat you, and beat the shit out of your mum.

Jack you had best unfuck yourself otherwise I will gouge out your proletariat eyes and skullfuck you!!!!

(see I can play the random obscenity game)

wheresmyshoes
Jan 31 2005 17:14

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!! red n black star

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:16
revol68 wrote:
3rd ur position is based on essentially living in an urban environment, if u lived in a fucking jungle u migth start thinking of animals more instrumentally.

I dont wanna be a hunter/gatherer. Ideally sustainable crop farming would be the way forward. Probably on a large scale due to the population and the fact I'd prefer people not to die.

wheresmyshoes
Jan 31 2005 17:19
3rdseason wrote:
revol68 wrote:
3rd ur position is based on essentially living in an urban environment, if u lived in a fucking jungle u migth start thinking of animals more instrumentally.

I dont wanna be a hunter/gatherer. Ideally sustainable crop farming would be the way forward. Probably on a large scale due to the population and the fact I'd prefer people not to die.

What would you do if you were in a jungle and you couldn't eat any of the plants because they were all poisonus, apart from like the salad tree, but the mysterious salad tree couldn't sustain you. would you eat a pig then??...a jungle pig

phoebe
Jan 31 2005 17:21

I gotta say I'm somewhat with 3rd on this, but then I'm a vegan lifestylist pseudoradical cunt.

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:23
Jack wrote:
Serious question, 3rd.

If your girlfriend dumped you for a dinosaur, would you still think so highly of animals?

Look, we've told you many times how much we sympathise with what happened -- she wasn't worth it, u know, and u can't hold it against the rest of the Animal Commune

[But did you see the size of the stubby tail on that thing?]

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:24
phoebe wrote:
I gotta say I'm somewhat with 3rd on this, but then I'm a vegan lifestylist pseudoradical cunt.

See phoebe knows the score 8)

cantdocartwheels
Jan 31 2005 17:24

I think we must remind our our green revisionists, that WE WILL BURY YOU!, now we said this before and got into trouble, so we will say it again, after the revolution, the working class will pick up shovels and bury you!*

And now for the latest on colchesters tractor production, our (admittedly somewhat dead) comrade vladimir

*prizes who can get the slightly adapted quote

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:24

Fuck the Thatcher's Children Brigade are winning eek eek

Avanti! :greenblackstar: :greenblackstar:

wheresmyshoes
Jan 31 2005 17:27

I still want to know the answer to my salad tree question?

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:28

That did actually happen.

Then I wrote an emo song about it called "My girl dumped me for a dinosaur and now I'm gonna slit my wrists and bleed over everything"

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:30

You really wanna know the answer to your impossible scenario? Why?

Theres nowhere without any edible plants.

Anyway what does the jungle pig feed on if everythings poisonous, heeeey?? grin grin

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:30
cantdocartwheels wrote:
I think we must remind our our green revisionists, that WE WILL BURY YOU!, now we said this before and got into trouble

yeah -- when u put one tin can in space and you think industry's on the side of the working class. roll eyes U really think free workers will want to worki in the smelting plants?

Start learning to make wicker baskets and clay pots if you want to survive, Trot-boys! tongue

AnarchoAl
Jan 31 2005 17:32

Can a jungle pig defeat Swamp Thing though?

3rdseason
Jan 31 2005 17:33

I never realised I was politically aligned with Lazlo before.

Hes my new friend.

Lazlo_Woodbine
Jan 31 2005 17:33

Dualist!

Swamp Thing is friend to jungle pig :greenblackstar:

wheresmyshoes
Jan 31 2005 17:33
3rdseason wrote:
You really wanna know the answer to your impossible scenario? Why?

Theres nowhere without any edible plants.

Anyway what does the jungle pig feed on if everythings poisonous, heeeey?? grin grin

The pig feeds on the salad tree but because it's smaller than you it can live on it.but maybe they're places where almost all of the plants are inedible, maybe you're alergic to lots of the plants.

And btw 3rd those people on that dogsonacid thread are stupid 'real' emo owns red n black star

wheresmyshoes
Jan 31 2005 17:34
Lazlo_Woodbine wrote:
Dualist!

Swamp Thing is friend to jungle pig :greenblackstar:

jungle pig is so cool, so cool I'd eat him yumyumyum! wink

AnarchoAl
Jan 31 2005 17:35

In that case, will Swamp Thing kill the starving formerly vegan primmies when they try and eat the jungle pig? Surely that would prove Jack's original point about whose side Swamp Thing is on?