Is Rugby Union a game for public school boys, and middle class twats?

Yes
62% (13 votes)
No
38% (8 votes)
Total votes: 21

Posted By

Devrim
Apr 12 2006 12:48

Tags

Share

Attached files

Comments

Devrim
Apr 12 2006 12:48

I am posting this on the libcommunity board as I don't flame on the other boards where it is not allowed.

Please forgive me if I am wrong, but I was under the distinct impression that all over the world (except in South Wales) Rugby Union was a game played by public school boys, and middle class twats. Rugby League is the 'workers' game. tongue

Joseph Kay
Apr 12 2006 12:51

dunno, i used to play rugby union for years. but that was very near south wales. and i might just be a middle class twat. League is more 'northern' so i guess it must be working class wink

the button
Apr 12 2006 12:54

I played rugby league at junior school (note to overseas posters -- that's up to age 11) and then rugby union at secondary school (which was a state comprehensive before you all start wink ).

We certainly used to play the local posh schools at rugby union, which was always complete carnage. smile

Edit for geographics fans: this was in Yorkshire.

jef costello
Apr 12 2006 12:54

I was going to say yes, but I've grown quite fond of Joseph K.

Serge Forward
Apr 12 2006 12:59

Yes, definitely a game best played on the lawns of Upper Poshington (Welsh teams exempted).

Rugby League of course, is far better and much more proley. Oh yes, I remember the days when I used to go to Swinton's Station Road ground (before it became a fucking supermarket) on a Sunday afternoon because you could still get a pint in after the pubs had shut. Never really followed the game much, but this was Swinton y'know.

And you don't get all these rucks in rugby league - which are obviously just a chance for ex-public schoolboys to feel up the other team's arses or suck each others' cocks on the quiet. Nope, when we rugby leaguers suck each others cocks, we don't need no ruck to hide behind.

What was I saying?

Er, yes, Rugby Union is posh.

Devrim
Apr 12 2006 12:59

I believe that it is actually true all over the world. Ask the Australians. It comes down to a split over one hundred years ago over 'lost time' payments for workers whereas the 'gentlemen' who played Rugby Union obviously didn't need them. I remember when I lived in England during the miners strike that the international RL team refused to wear their shirts which were sponsered by British Coal, and finally went out with the logo covered up. The captain of the English Rugby Union time was probably fucking Princess Dianna at the time. This is what I call a class difference.

P.S. I am not wholly serious about this being a class line. wink

revol68
Apr 12 2006 13:00

Devrim you are one hundred percent correct.

Rugby Union is for middle class wankers!

Ramona
Apr 12 2006 13:01

You may not believe this, but I used to play rugby at junior school 8) Touch rugby thoug, what with being a girl and all... embarrassed

the button
Apr 12 2006 13:05
Serge Forward wrote:
And you don't get all these rucks in rugby league - which are obviously just a chance for ex-public schoolboys to feel up the other team's arses or suck each others' cocks on the quiet. Nope, when we rugby leaguers suck each others cocks, we don't need no ruck to hide behind.

Post of the year. grin

Serge Forward
Apr 12 2006 13:05
Devrim wrote:
P.S. I am not wholly serious about this being a class line. :wink:

Well I fucking am. And at the next AF conference, I'll be proposing something along the lines of...

'Any member who likes Rugby Union and is not from Wales or is not in somne gay rugby team can fuck right off and join Friends of the Earth instead.'

Steven.
Apr 12 2006 13:06
zobag wrote:
You may not believe this, but I used to play rugby at junior school 8) Touch rugby thoug, what with being a girl and all... embarrassed

grin

Which one is better? Do they ever play each other?

revol68
Apr 12 2006 13:12
John. wrote:
zobag wrote:
You may not believe this, but I used to play rugby at junior school 8) Touch rugby thoug, what with being a girl and all... embarrassed

grin

Which one is better? Do they ever play each other?

I think John did a sex pee in his pants. roll eyes

Ramona
Apr 12 2006 13:14

grin Do you mean did the girl's team play the boys team?

Steven.
Apr 12 2006 13:20
zobag wrote:
grin Do you mean did the girl's team play the boys team?

No I meant do Union and League teams play against each other. I wanna know which is best.

ftony
Apr 12 2006 13:20

rugby union all the freaking way.

i admit maybe 50% are farty public school boys but the rest are cool people like me who just learnt it at (comprehensive) school and enjoyed it

Devrim
Apr 12 2006 13:22

John, They are actually two different games with different rules, and different numbers of players, so it is very difficult to compare who is actually best.

revol68
Apr 12 2006 13:22
ftony wrote:
rugby union all the freaking way.

i admit maybe 50% are farty public school boys but the rest are cool people like me who just learnt it at (comprehensive) school and enjoyed it

sorry, did someone say something?

revol68
Apr 12 2006 13:23
Devrim wrote:
John, They are actually two different games with different rules, and different numbers of players, so it is very difficult to compare who is actually best.

Johns a poncey geek who doesn't understand any sports.

Joseph Kay
Apr 12 2006 13:24
John. wrote:
No I meant do Union and League teams play against each other. I wanna know which is best.

ranking and hierarchy. tut tut tut.

Jef Costello wrote:
I was going to say yes, but I've grown quite fond of Joseph K.

vote yes without illusions Jef, i've just remembered my coach once said (i was like 9),

Quote:
football is a gentleman's game played by hooligans, rugby is a hooligan's game played by gentleman

eek embarrassed

i played both mind confused

Steven.
Apr 12 2006 13:27
revol68 wrote:
Devrim wrote:
John, They are actually two different games with different rules, and different numbers of players, so it is very difficult to compare who is actually best.

Johns a poncey geek who doesn't understand any sports.

I understand most sports, just not rugby. Or american football. I never played rugby when I was a kid, nor did any of my mates. We thought it was just a sport for poshos. And not posh like I am (no regional accent) but actually posh - rich, possibly related to aristocracy, etc. You know - rugger buggers and rahs. The only people I've known play or like rugby are like that.

So I reckon you're *all* ponces.

PaulMarsh
Apr 12 2006 14:43

In England rugby union is a game for middle class twats and cops.

Wales is an exception of course, but that should not distract us too much in this poll.

jef costello
Apr 12 2006 14:51
Joseph K. wrote:
Quote:
football is a gentleman's game played by hooligans, rugby is a hooligan's game played by gentleman

I like that quote, I think he stole it from somewhere.

revol68
Apr 12 2006 14:54

yeah they told me that at my school.

Stuck up wannnabe provincial grammar school wankers!

Joseph Kay
Apr 12 2006 14:55
Jef Costello wrote:
Joseph K. wrote:
Quote:
football is a gentleman's game played by hooligans, rugby is a hooligan's game played by gentleman

I like that quote, I think he stole it from somewhere.

probably. he wasn't much of a philosopher.

jef costello
Apr 12 2006 14:58

If you grew up in london and played rubgy then you are posh, you can't do a rugby tackle on concrete.

Joseph Kay
Apr 12 2006 15:00

double post

Joseph Kay
Apr 12 2006 15:01
Jef Costello wrote:
If you grew up in london and played rubgy then you are posh, you can't do a rugby tackle on concrete.

i used to play in goal on concrete. still got the scars....

although obviously football on concrete is just a pretext for fighting, or at least it was in my hardcore rural upbringing wink

hmm double post. oops.

revolutionrugger
Apr 12 2006 15:02

while i realize that it is no one's intent, can we cut the subtle homophobia when bashing bougie rugby players? Why is it amusing if guys forced into repressing their orientation by an oppressive heteronormative society, sublimate it into homoerotic athleticism. Its not funny. You're laughing at oppression in a pretty homophobic way. Stop it.

knightrose
Apr 12 2006 15:05

I'd like to thank Serge for making an exception in my case.

In these northern wastes, Rugby League is definitely more working class - and harder - union is nobbier and often played by people who've got too old and tired for league.

But having grown up in the soft south I quite like union and still enjoy watching mates play - even though I was cruelly injured whilst doing the touch judge and now can barely run.

Steven.
Apr 12 2006 15:08
revolutionrugger wrote:
while i realize that it is no one's intent, can we cut the subtle homophobia when bashing bougie rugby players? Why is it amusing if guys forced into repressing their orientation by an oppressive heteronormative society, sublimate it into homoerotic athleticism. Its not funny. You're laughing at oppression in a pretty homophobic way. Stop it.

Wasn't it only one person - serge - who did that?