Following a request from coffeemachine on another thread, where he and raw stated their disbelief in the conventional orthodoxy which states that HIV is a virus which exists, and that it leads to AIDS.
A few questions came up for them on that thread, which CM said he would answer on a different thread so here they are:
raw wrote:
I have my doubts whether HIV courses AIDS as there is a wealth of actual scientific knowledge which has been published - mainly in continuum magazine which folded sometime ago. There has also been attemtps by the WHO an UN to portray AIDS in Africa as the result of HIV contamination. There are many reasons why immune systems collapse (poor quality water, unsanatised environment, starvation,...etc) all of which could be picked up as being caused by HIV.
John wrote:
Would drinking poor water make you develop antibodies to HIV then and show as positive?What about the 60,000 people who who are HIV positive in this country? Are they malnourished?
Dundee_United wrote:
Right coffeemachine and raw - what causes AIDS? What are the modalities? Do you think that HIV exists?Raw seems to suggest that HIV might be a syndrome linked with ridiculous, poor living conditions such as those that prevail in failed states in the third world. This to me cannot explain how you can contract HIV just like how you can contract Hepatitis.
John wrote:
CM, how can you say HIV doesn't exist when the virus has been identified? And what have all the HIV+ westerners got then, if all the Africans are actually just malnourished (which is actually a ridiculous charicature of Africa as backwards, and not backed up by facts), and why is HIV spreading so fast in Eastern Europe? And if it's not, because HIV doesn't exist, then what is it?
pingtiao wrote:
If AIDS is not caused by a virus, why would giving anti-retroviral drugs like the AZT cocktail delay the drop in Th-cell number for those patients identified as having HIV present in their blood?
