FInding that there is not a humanitarian situation that America can't fleece for its own war machinations, we have this gem of an article out of time...
Quote:
"You have to think it through — do you want to secure an area of the country by military force? What kinds of potential security risks would that create?" says Egelend. "I can't imagine any humanitarian organization wanting to shoot their way in with food."
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1739053,00.html?cnn=yes
While obviously the Buremese military junta is full of ass holes, and I especially don't care about a nations "sovereignty", I can't possibly see where a guns a-blazing scenario would somehow benefit the people dying in the areas affected by the cyclone.
