Solidarity with victims of war - Manchester AF leaflet

9 posts / 0 new
Last post
knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Jan 25 2009 08:32
Solidarity with victims of war - Manchester AF leaflet

This is the text of our new leaflet on gaza.
we're going out distributing it today.

Solidarity with victims of war

The atrocity in gaza
As the dust settles, the extent of the atrocities which the Israeli state has committed against the population of the Gaza strip has become clear. Thousands are dead, killed in the savage bombing of one of the most densely populated places on earth. Israel has used banned white phosphorous munitions in civilian areas, shelled aid convoys, schools, shelters and mosques full of people. It has destroyed aid stockpiles with white phosphorous shells. Over 90,000 people have been displaced. Gaza’s economy and infrastructure, already devastated by the blockade, have been destroyed. With the ceasefire signed, the continued blockade will mean further war against the civilian population by other means.

A two state solution?
As the bombs rained down every party and group put forward their vision for ‘fixing’ the problem and their vision of the future for Palestinians. But understanding what we can’t do is the first step to understanding what we can. We have to be clear about the ways we can stop such atrocities happening.

A ‘two state solution’ based on 1949 or 1967 borders isn’t going to come about except through a massive change in the global balance of power. This will inevitably lead to more conflicts elsewhere. Two states with borders as they currently stand would create a Palestine as dominated by Israel as the territories are now. Even if the ‘one state solution’ became a reality, the Palestinian working class would remain an underclass of cheap labourers. It would be like the end of Apartheid in South Africa. The colour of those in charge changed but left the vast population in the same dreadful state of poverty and hopelessness as before.

It is also true that we cannot call on ‘our’ state to reign in Israel. Firstly, the state will not concede anything to us unless the working class – the vast majority of us who can only live off our ability to work for others – is in a confident enough position to force those concessions through collective action. Secondly, it is madness to expect Britain to impose ‘civilised’ behaviour on an ally such as Israel. Britain has taken part in the occupation in Iraq which has resulted in the deaths of 1,033,000 people. The only state which has any ability to reign in Israel is the US. The US will only do this when Israel’s actions threaten its national interest. Moral outrage will not win over dominating the region.

Solidarity with working class struggles
We must stand in firmly in solidarity with the victims of state warfare. The terrorised population of Gaza did not heed Hamas’ call to resist through ‘martyrdom’, or to undertake suicide attacks. They fled en masse. They showed no willingness to carry out a ‘resistance’ on behalf of their masters which would have meant certain death. Whilst Palestinians fled the onslaught, demonstrations were held in Israel by those refusing to serve the war machine. These refusals to heed the call of the state or the ruling party to fight deserve our support and solidarity.

We cannot support Hamas, or any of the other factions in Gaza or the West Bank against Israel, however ‘critically’. Hamas’ record of repressing the attempts of workers to improve their living conditions is well known. They have escorted striking teachers back to work at gunpoint, and have closed down medical facilities where staff attempted to strike. Both Hamas and Fatah have made kidnapping and assassination attempts on the same trade unionists. Hamas execute those forced by necessity into sex work, and persecute gays and lesbians. They offer as little to ordinary Palestinians as their rivals in secular nationalist groups, such as Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, who attacked the Palestine Workers Radio for stoking internal conflicts. Real internationalism means recognising that the rulers and ruled within a ‘nation’ have nothing in common. In this case, this means supporting the efforts of ordinary Palestinians to improve their conditions. We support them against either Israel, as in the struggles organised by village committees in the West Bank, or against the ‘resistance’ movements which police the population.

Our solidarity must be with the victims of war. These are overwhelmingly Palestinian but also workers, Jewish, Arab and others, killed by mortars and rockets in Israel. This cannot be because of their race, nationality, or religion, but because they are living, thinking, feeling and struggling human beings. And we must stand against all those who would sacrifice them to their own ends. Ultimately the only solution to endless global conflict and war is for working class people, the dispossessed majority who must sell their time and energy to those who own and control society, to struggle in our interests collectively, against their exploitation, and against divisions such as gender and race. This means struggle against the capitalist system which creates endemic war and which must exploit us to survive. From this we can set about taking control of our own lives, and putting an end to a world of warring states and states-in-waiting which has produced atrocities such as those in Gaza.

Devrim's picture
Devrim
Offline
Joined: 15-07-06
Jan 25 2009 08:50

Very good, I am impressed. Are you doing it nationally or only in Manchester?

I have a few comments to make on this paragraph

Quote:
A ‘two state solution’ based on 1949 or 1967 borders isn’t going to come about except through a massive change in the global balance of power. This will inevitably lead to more conflicts elsewhere. Two states with borders as they currently stand would create a Palestine as dominated by Israel as the territories are now. Even if the ‘one state solution’ became a reality, the Palestinian working class would remain an underclass of cheap labourers. It would be like the end of Apartheid in South Africa. The colour of those in charge changed but left the vast population in the same dreadful state of poverty and hopelessness as before.

I think that a 'real' Palestinian state is impossible outside of a massive change in the balance of power as you do. However, a sort of two state solution based on a Palestinian 'bantustan' is a possibility and maybe even likely. Maybe this could have been stressed.

I don't think that a 'one state solution' can happen.

Devrim

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Jan 25 2009 09:54

The leaflet has been produced by Manchester AF. It was only produced and agreed yesterday. We would expect other groups to use it if they find it helpful - for example if they have a demo to distribute it at.

It appears on the af-north website and will be linked to on the main afed site. We also have submitted it to the afed blog.

Quote:
I don't think that a 'one state solution' can happen.

I agree.

Django's picture
Django
Offline
Joined: 18-01-08
Jan 25 2009 10:29

Devrim, you are right and there is a reference to this in the paragraph you quoted - though perhaps it could have been stressed more.

Django's picture
Django
Offline
Joined: 18-01-08
Jan 25 2009 16:21

We handed this out at a large demonstration in town today, along with Solfed comrades who were distributing the 'Against war and warmongers' leaflet. There was a good number of us, and we managed to give away a lot of material to those on the demo and to passersby, probably more so than any other groups.

We got some grief off some Islamists, which was to be expected. The tone of the demonstration was very nationalist, ranging from groups of Islamists waving Hamas and Hezbollah flags, and chanting "Viva Hamas" and "Allahu Akbar", to chants of "Israel must go", "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free", etc. There was interest in what we were putting out though, and most people seemed reasonably decent about it.

This text was put together by the Manchester group for the demonstration today, though other groups may use it at similar demos.

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Jan 25 2009 16:50

Fortunately where I was - at the back - I didn't hear some of those slogans, apart from the River to sea one.
We got a bit of hassle of a white guy with a Respect placard who said that if we didn't support Hamas or Fatah we shouldn't be on the demo!
However the other people around us didn't seem as stupid. The chant which was most enthusiastically taken up was against the BBC, which tbh I encouraged, having quite a loud voice.
I'm convinced that most of those taking part are there because they want to do"something" for their Muslim brothers and sisters (as they see it). That comes from a basic sentiment of common humanity as much as shared religion, I think.

Django's picture
Django
Offline
Joined: 18-01-08
Jan 25 2009 17:05

Yes, I think that lots of the people there had a humanitarian interest in what was going on, but the chants being led by the stewards where I was were very nationalist indeed.

Khawaga's picture
Khawaga
Offline
Joined: 7-08-06
Jan 25 2009 17:41

Good stuff again. I am really impressed with what you in the AF has produced on Gaza. I've got one small comment

Quote:
such as Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, who attacked the Palestine Workers Radio for stoking internal conflicts.

I don't know how it was written in the final flier, but "stoking internal conflicts" should be in scare quotes.