Anarchopedia is expanding, and needs to expand more

157 posts / 0 new
Last post
ethical_anarhist
Offline
Joined: 15-11-07
Dec 6 2007 11:49
Anarchopedia is expanding, and needs to expand more

Anarchopedia is an internet open knowledge portal, similar to Wikipedia, but one geared towards working through
anarchist principles and providing information for revolutionaries.

The first article for English-language Anarchopedia has been written on 2004 November 29, and since then a lot
of development has happened on that open knowledge portal. It now contains more than 3000 articles on the whole
range of topics which can be useful to radicals, revolutionaries, or just information that is commonly censored
in today's society.

We are always looking for people who have dedication enough to help us improve the portal, come and join us on
Anarchopedia.org

English Language Anarchopedia: http://eng.anarchopedia.org/

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 6 2007 11:58

ethical_anarhist, don't you have some very dodgy views on "child love"?

Anna's picture
Anna
Offline
Joined: 13-11-07
Dec 6 2007 12:03

Ugh, the majority of articles on there look pretty dodge to say the least

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 12:35
Jack wrote:
apparently wikipedia doesn't allow stuff on certain topics.

Man-Boy Love?

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 12:35
Jack wrote:
apparently wikipedia doesn't allow stuff on certain topics.

Man-Boy Love?

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 12:36

Oh no, they do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nambla

powertotheimagi...
Offline
Joined: 24-06-05
Dec 6 2007 13:17

Dosen't look to bad.

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Dec 6 2007 13:25

A NAMBLA logo. The capital M and lowercase b symbolize a man and a boy

redyred
Offline
Joined: 20-02-04
Dec 6 2007 13:28

http://eng.anarchopedia.org/

Several articles fixed.

MJ's picture
MJ
Offline
Joined: 5-01-06
Dec 6 2007 13:29

http://eng.anarchopedia.org/childlover

neutral

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Dec 6 2007 13:48

"Girl moment

Girl moment, or "GM" for short, is a term used by some childlovers to define any sort of interaction between an adult (who has a sexual orientation favouring female children) and one or more female children. The interactions are not necessarily illegal (although the definition of "girl moment" as used, could be reasonably applied to the commission of illegal activities), and can involve anything from merely an encounter at a bus stop, to a good deed (helping a lost child find her parents, etc), a birthday party, babysitting occasion, and others.

The contents of a girl moment usually focuses on non-sexually describing the events that went on in the day, and is applicable more as a descriptive narrative of an occasion, which someone who has a sexual orientation favouring female children could read and enjoy. Such moments are rarely sexually explicit, and their purpose is not (generally) to arouse the sexual appetites of its readers."

I think this picture needs to be added to the entry, for greater clarity on what we could be dealing with here.

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 13:51

Worth a thousand words

Feighnt
Offline
Joined: 20-07-06
Dec 6 2007 13:55

eh, it's fixed now.

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 14:00

Haha brilliant

David in Atlanta
Offline
Joined: 21-04-06
Dec 6 2007 14:00

Not a bad idea on the face of it, especially if it can avoid the controversie and edit-wars of the anarchist portal in wikipedia.

BTW, I completely replaced the text of the article on WSA, which was a stub at best and included a couple of gross over-simplifications.

Joseph Kay's picture
Joseph Kay
Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
Dec 6 2007 14:10

interesting that this...

Quote:
Pedophilia, in no way, and under no variety of name, has anything to do with Anarchism.

...got reverted neutral

Mike Harman
Offline
Joined: 7-02-06
Dec 6 2007 14:18
Quote:
Not a bad idea on the face of it, especially if it can avoid the controversie and edit-wars of the anarchist portal in wikipedia.

Given that page is number one on google for anarchism - I'd suggest the time might be better spent on the edit war.

bugbear
Offline
Joined: 5-12-06
Dec 6 2007 14:18

Between the child-lover entry getting 'fixed' within about 20 minutes and the animal liberation stuff on the front page I think I'll give that place a miss.

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 14:20

What the fuck? What kind of cunt would change that back???

Joseph Kay's picture
Joseph Kay
Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
Dec 6 2007 14:36

well given as they left this link at the bottom....

Quote:
* naphtala's freesite "Freesite of self confessed pedophile."

i'd imagine the paedo-apologist kind

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 6 2007 14:41

* Christian Sexuality "Pro-child-love, pro-polygamy, Christian opinion page....no pornography".

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 6 2007 15:12

Anarchopedia has loads of articles on that have been nicked off libcom. If it's a pro paedophile site then we would definitely not allow any of our content on it. I didn't know the original poster here had anything to do with it - you still haven't owned up if you're the person who posts in places as "Volodya" and is a supporter of child rape.

I mean I know that you are, but you could still have the decency to admit it.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 6 2007 15:39
guydebordisdead wrote:
Wow. That's fucked up, who would of thought my simple pun would unearth a paedo. No platform his ass.

I laughed a lot when I saw that because I wrote my first post before you made yours! But yeah it's a bit of a giveaway.

Battlescarred
Offline
Joined: 27-02-06
Dec 6 2007 18:26

What about Hakim's brother Mustafa?
(think about it)

Rob Ray's picture
Rob Ray
Offline
Joined: 6-11-03
Dec 6 2007 18:48

Quick point, Volodya has never said he's a paedophile or actively advocated child rape, afaik, he's supported their right to free speech and said he's unsure as to his own position on it, both of which I'd say are quite stupid and verging on unacceptable, but not quite the same thing.

Feighnt
Offline
Joined: 20-07-06
Dec 7 2007 01:31

you'd think, what with all the fucking of children, pedos would have less time to edit wiki articles.

i've made one last edit, as a little test - i didnt change any of the original wording, i just added a fair sized (bolded) paragraph pointing out the bullshit of the article. someone mentioned in the discussion on the article that we should respect the existence of this article due to "freedom of speech," i'm gonna see how long they respect it the other way around.

any bets on how long it takes for it to be deleted?

Choccy's picture
Choccy
Offline
Joined: 9-12-04
Dec 7 2007 01:49

That's mental if they take it down fuckin paedo-enabling bastards!

Feighnt
Offline
Joined: 20-07-06
Dec 7 2007 02:56

yep, my post was *completely* deleted already. so much for "freedom of speech."

(edit) maybe i'll just flame it mercilessly with hundreds of pics of jack pissing...

Joseph Kay's picture
Joseph Kay
Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
Dec 7 2007 07:17
Feighnt wrote:
so much for "freedom of speech."

exactly. for some reason i'm suspicious of sites who no platform critics of child abuse, while linking to "self-confessed pedophiles." so is it actually a nonce site or just an idiotic big tent project that thinks criticising nonces is 'sectarian'?

Rob Ray's picture
Rob Ray
Offline
Joined: 6-11-03
Dec 7 2007 10:49

Big tent project with some paedos who monitor the childlove pages I'd guess.

redyred
Offline
Joined: 20-02-04
Dec 7 2007 13:06

http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Hakim_Bey#Criticism

Fixed. Again.

Topic locked