Successful Fare Strike on New York Subways

Successful Fare Strike on New York Subways

This morning tens of thousands rode the New York City subways for free in a Fare Strike organized by Occupy Wall Street in coordination with rank-and-file transit workers.

Fare Strikes are one of the most effective ways for transit system employees to fight in solidarity with working class riders without stranding them in heavily transit-dependent cities like New York. And it hits the bosses where it hurts the most, at the fare box. Some comrades attempted an indefinite Fare Strike in San Francisco in 2005 with mixed results, although revenues went down in the tens of thousands of dollars during the first two days -- despite the hike in fares and it being the first week of school. These kinds of social strikes work, so hopefully the Occupy Movement will find other ways to take the class war on the offensive by making more social services free, while fighting in solidarity with the rank-and-file in the affected sector.

All Power to the NYC Subway Fare Strike!

Occupy Wall Street wrote:
Wednesday, March 28, 2012 — 10:30 AM

Rank and File Initiative
rankandfileinitiative [at] gmail.com
Twitter: #farestrike

This morning before rush hour, teams of activists, many from Occupy Wall Street, in conjunction with rank and file workers from the Transport Workers Union Local 100 and the Amalgamated Transit Union, opened up more than 20 stations across the city for free entry. As of 10:30 AM, the majority remain open. No property was damaged. Teams have chained open service gates and taped up turnstiles in a coordinated response to escalating service cuts, fare hikes, racist policing, assaults on transit workers’ working conditions and livelihoods — and the profiteering of the super-rich by way of a system they’ve rigged in their favor.

For the last several years, riders of public transit have been under attack. The cost of our Metrocards has been increasing, while train and bus service has been steadily reduced. Budget cuts have precipitated station closings and staff/safety reductions. Police routinely single out young black and Latino men for searches at the turnstile. Layoffs and attrition means cutting staff levels to the bare minimum, reducing services for seniors and disabled riders. At the same time, MTA workers have been laid off and have had their benefits drastically reduced. Contract negotiations are completely stalled.

Working people of all occupations, colors and backgrounds are expected to sacrifice to cover the budget cut by paying more for less service. But here’s the real cause of the problem: the rich are massively profiting from our transit system. Despite the fact that buses and subways are supposed to be a public service, the government and the MTA have turned the system backwards—into a virtual ATM for the super-rich. Instead of using our tax money to properly fund transit, Albany and City Hall have intentionally starved transit of public funds for over twenty years; the MTA must resort to bonds (loans from Wall Street) to pay for projects and costs. The MTA is legally required to funnel tax dollars and fares away from transportation costs and towards interest on these bonds, called "debt service." This means Wall Street bondholders receive a huge share of what we put into the system through the Metrocards we buy and the taxes we pay: more than $2 billion a year goes to debt service, and this number is expected to rise every year. If trends continue, by 2018 more than one out of every five dollars of MTA revenue will head to a banker’s pockets.

This much is clear: the MTA’s priorities are all out of whack. This fare strike is a means for workers and riders to fight for shared interests together — but this is just a first step. All of us — the 99% — have an interest in full-service public transportation system that treats its ridership and employees with dignity.

The MTA is a shared, public service — fund it with tax revenues.
Eliminate free money for bondholders at the expense of taxpayers.
End the assault on worker's livelihoods
.

Posted By

Hieronymous
Mar 29 2012 05:16

Share


  • This fare strike is a means for workers and riders to fight for shared interests together — but this is just a first step. All of us — the 99% — have an interest in full-service public transportation system that treats its ridership and employees with dignity.

    Occupy Wall Street

Attached files

Comments

Chilli Sauce
Apr 6 2012 17:05

So, for those folks on the ground, the TWU seems to have come out in pretty strong support of this. What's going on there? Is it sincere? Pressure from the rank-and-file? Radicals in the leadership?

Also, didn't that local lose their rights to dues check-off after that last big strike? Have they gained that back? If not, have a majority of workers begun paying dues again?

no.25
Apr 6 2012 19:26
Schwarz wrote:
anonymous douchebag snitch from the gothamist article wrote:
This is just a little food for thought. I just don't want people to get swept away in the excitement of all the direct action and not realize they may also be pulling other people into their shit, and those other people are going to catch the fire, not them. If it happens that station agents lose their jobs because of this I can guarantee it will hurt the relationship between TWU and OWS.

More info has been coming out about this.

Rank and file support (outside those who were involved) has been enthusiastic and was instrumental in forcing the above semi-endorsement of the action by Samuelson.

So despite the slanders and alarmism of that early account by that "TWU employee" (read: a NYU graduate student in CPUSA(!) interning at the union to bring out the votes for Democrats, you can't make this shit up...) there likely will be no disciplinary proceedings against these workers.

Why? Word on the street is that a couple of days after the action Local 100 made a call to the MTA telling them that the moment the first disciplinary hearing begins every train and bus in NYC stops and 32,000 workers hit the street.

I doubt they will call TWU's bluff, but we'll see!

Excellent, that's great news. The CPUSA is garbage.

petey
Apr 7 2012 02:07
Quote:
So, for those folks on the ground, the TWU seems to have come out in pretty strong support of this. What's going on there? Is it sincere? Pressure from the rank-and-file? Radicals in the leadership?

of these, i'd say pressure from the rank and file. there is a good tradition of solidarity in the local historically, though i don't know the specifics here.

Quote:
Also, didn't that local lose their rights to dues check-off after that last big strike? Have they gained that back?

i don't think so.

Quote:
The CPUSA is garbage.

yes it is.

Schwarz
Apr 15 2012 22:25
redsdisease
Apr 16 2012 05:22
Schwarz wrote:
In typical fashion, the ISO weighs in:

http://socialistworker.org/2012/04/12/fair-protest-new-york-city

I like how all these lefty organizations are pulling a line that seems to be to the right of the union leadership. I know that the ISO has always been pretty awful, but is it just me or have they become even more conservative in the past year?

S. Artesian
Apr 16 2012 15:05
redsdisease wrote:
Schwarz wrote:
In typical fashion, the ISO weighs in:

http://socialistworker.org/2012/04/12/fair-protest-new-york-city

I like how all these lefty organizations are pulling a line that seems to be to the right of the union leadership. I know that the ISO has always been pretty awful, but is it just me or have they become even more conservative in the past year?

Part of their strategy for replacing the CPUSA as the "yes... but" vanguard of anti-revolution.