animal liberation
Reply to 'Letter on animal liberation' - Antagonism and Practical History
The authors of Beasts of Burden respond to Gilles Dauvé's Letter on Animal Liberation.
Beasts of Burden was written as a polemical text with the aim of provoking debate, so we were pleased to read you considered response. However, we have found it difficult to answer your response to our pamphlet. Some of your criticisms we fully accept.
Reply to Undercurrent - Antagonism and Practical History
The authors of Beasts of Burden respond to Undercurrent's review of the article.
Dear undercurrent,
Thankyou for reviewing Beasts of Burden, and making some interesting comments on it. We were (pleasantly) surprised at how favourable your review started. A minor point we'd like to make is that the pamphlet was a collective effort and not the work of a single author, as your review assumes.
Beasts of burden - Antagonism and Practical History
An attempt to rethink the separation between animal liberationist and communist politics.
Introduction
A critique of animal rights ideology
Are animals a class? It is a sign of our times that many people probably respond to this question with a resounding: "Hmmmm, this takes some consideration.", instead of a prompt: "No, bollocks."
