This is not a list of the “best” fantasy or SF. There are huge numbers of superb works not on the list. Those below are chosen not just because of their quality—which though mostly good, is variable—but because the politics they embed (deliberately or not) are of particular interest to socialists. Of course, other works—by the same or other writers—could have been chosen: disagreement and alternative suggestions are welcomed. I change my own mind hour to hour on this anyway.
Iain M. Banks—Use of Weapons (1990)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL15833793W/Use_of_weapons
Socialist SF discussing a post-scarcity society. The Culture are “goodies” in narrative and political terms, but here issues of cross-cultural guilt and manipulation complicate the story from being a simplistic utopia.
Edward Bellamy—Looking Backward, 2000–1887 (1888)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/624
A hugely influential, rather bureaucratic egalitarian/naïve communist utopia. Deals very well with the confusion of the “modern” (19th Century) protagonist in a world he hasn’t helped create (see Bogdanov).
Alexander Bogdanov—The Red Star: A Utopia (1908; trans. 1984)
https://monoskop.org/File:Bogdanov_Alexander_Red_Star_The_First_Bolshevik_Utopia.pdf
This Bolshevik SF sends a revolutionary to socialist Mars. The book’s been criticized (with some justification) for being proto-Stalinist, but overall it’s been maligned. Deals well with the problem faced by someone trying to adjust to a new society s/he hasn’t helped create (see Bellamy).
Emma Bull & Steven Brust—Freedom & Necessity (1997)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL989161M/Freedom_necessity
Bull is a left-liberal and Brust is a Trotskyist fantasy writer. F&N is set in the 19th Century of the Chartists and class turmoil. It’s been described as “the first Marxist steampunk” or “a fantasy for Young Hegelians.”
Mikhail Bulgakov—The Master and Margarita (1938; trans. 1967)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2372307M/The_Master_and_Margarita
Astonishing fantasy set in ’30s Moscow, featuring the Devil, Pontius Pilate, The Wandering Jew, and a satire and critique of Stalinist Russia so cutting it is unbelievable that it got past the censors. Utterly brilliant.
Katherine Burdekin (aka “Murray Constantine”)—Swastika Night (1937)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL26787805M/Swastika_Night_(S.F._Masterworks)
An excellent example of the “Hitler Wins” sub-genre of SF. It’s unusual in that it was published by the Left Book Club and it was written while Hitler was in power, so the fear of Nazi future was immediate.
Octavia Butler—Survivor (1978)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL35619W/Survivor
Black American writer, now discovered by the mainstream after years of acclaim in the SF field. Kindred is her most overtly political novel, the Patternmaster series the most popular. Survivor brilliantly blends genre SF with issues of colonialism and racism.
Julio Cortázar—“House Taken Over” (1963?)
https://www.shortstoryproject.com/story/house-taken-over/
A terrifying short story undermining the notion of the house as sanctity and refuge. A subtle destruction of the bourgeois oppositions between public/private and inside/outside.
Philip K. Dick—A Scanner Darkly (1977)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL2172516W/A_Scanner_Darkly
Could have picked almost any of his books. Like all of them, this deals with identity, power, and betrayal, here tied in more directly to social structures than in some other works (though see Counter-Clock World and The Man in the High Castle). Incredibly moving.
Thomas Disch—The Priest (1994)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL73876W/The_Priest
Utterly savage work of anti-clericalism. A work of dark fantasy GBH against the Catholic Church (dedicated, among others, to the Pope…)
Gordon Eklund—All Times Possible(1974)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL4798488W/All_Times_possible
Study of alternative worlds, including an examination of hypothetical Left-wing movements in alternative USAs.
Max Ernst—Une Semaine de Bonté (1934)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL2248590W/Une_semaine_de_bont%C3%A9
The definitive Surrealist collage novel. A succession of images the reader is involved in decoding. A Whodunwhat, with characters from polite commercial catalogues engaged in a story of little deaths and high adventure.
Claude Farrère—Useless Hands (1920; trans. 1926)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5053847M/Useless_hands
Bleak Social Darwinism, and a prototype of “farewell to the working class” arguments. The “useless hands”—workers—revolt is seen as pathetic before inexorable technology. A cold, reactionary, interesting book.
Anatole France—The White Stone (1905; trans. 1910)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/49092
In part, a rebuttal to the racist “yellow peril” fever of the time—a book about “white peril” and the rise of socialism. Also interesting is The Revolt of the Angels, which examines now well-worn socialist theme of Lucifer being in the right, rebelling against the despotic God.
Jane Gaskell—Strange Evil (1957)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL6666202W/Strange_evil
Written when Gaskell was 14, with the flaws that entails. Still, however, extraordinary. A savage fairy tale, with fraught sexuality, meditations on Tom Paine and Marx, revolutionary upheaval depicted sympathetically, but without sentimentality; plus the most disturbing baddy in fiction.
Mary Gentle—Rats and Gargoyles (1990)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL3195056W/Rats_and_gargoyles
Set in a city that undermines the “feudalism lite” of most genre fantasy. An untypical female protagonist has adventures in a cityscape complete with class struggle, corruption, and racial oppression.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman—“The Yellow Wallpaper” (1892)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1952
Towering work by this radical thinker. Terrifying short story showing how savage gender oppression can inhere in “caring” relationships just as easily as in more obviously abusive ones. See also her feminist/socialistic utopias “Moving the Mountain” (1911) and Herland (1914).
Lisa Goldstein—The Dream Years (1985)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL17037W/The_dream_years
A time-slip oscillating between Paris in the 1920s, during the Surrealist movement, and in 1968, during the Uprising. Uses a popular fantastic mode to examine the relation between Surrealism as the fantastic mode par excellence and revolutionary movements (if nebulously conceived).
Stefan Grabiński—The Dark Domain (1918–22; trans. and collected 1993)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL8768524M/The_Dark_Domain_(Dedalus_European_Classics)
Brilliant horror by this Polish writer. Unusually locates the uncanny and threatening within the very symbols of a modernizing industrialism in Poland: trains, electricity, etc. This awareness of the instability of the everyday marks him out from traditional, “nostalgic” ghost story writers.
George Griffith—The Angel of Revolution (1893)
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/31324
Rather dated, but unusual in that its heroes are revolutionary terrorists. Very different from the devious anarchist villains of (e.g.) Chesterton.
Imil Habibi—The Secret Life of Saeed the Pessoptimist (1974; trans. 1982)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL3429597W/The_secret_life_of_Saeed
The full title is much longer. Habiby was a member of the Palestinian Community Party, a veteran of the anti-British struggle of the 40s, and a member of the Knesset for several years. This amiable, surreal book is about the life of a Palestinian in Israel (with surreal bits, and aliens).
M. John Harrison—Viriconium Nights (1984)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7877947M/Viriconium_Nights
A stunning writer, who expresses the alienation of the modern everyday with terrible force. Fantasy that mercilessly uncovers the alienated nature of the longing for fantastic escape, and show how that fantasy will always remain out of reach. Punishes his readers and characters for their involvement with fantasy. See also The Course of the Heart.
Ursula K. Le Guin—The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia (1974)
http://libcom.org/library/dispossessed-ursula-le-guin
The most overtly political of this anarchist writer’s excellent works. An examination of the relations between a rich, exploitive capitalist world and a poor, nearly barren (though high-tech) communist one.
Jack London—Iron Heel (1907)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1164
London’s masterpiece: scholars from a 27th Century socialist world find documents depicting a fascist oligarchy in the US and the revolt of the proletariat. Elsewhere, London’s undoubted socialism is undermined by the most appalling racism.
Ken MacLeod—The Star Fraction (1996)
http://libcom.org/library/cassini-division-ken-macleod
British Trotskyist (of strongly libertarian bent), all of whose (very good) works examine Left politics without sloganeering. The Stone Canal, for example, features arguments about distortions of Marxism. However, The Star Fraction is chosen here as it features Virtual Reality heroes of the left, by name—a roll call of genuine revolutionaries recast in digital form.
Gregory Maguire—Wicked (1995)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL66233W/Wicked
Brilliant revisionist fantasy about how the winners write history. The loser whose side is here taken is the Wicked Witch of the West, a fighter for emancipatory politics in the despotic empire of Oz.
J. Leslie Mitchell (Lewis Grassic Gibbon)—Gay Hunter(1934, reissued 1989)
https://digital.nls.uk/lewis-grassic-gibbon-books/archive/205174255
By the Marxist writer of the classic work of vernacular Scots literature A Scots Quair, and Spartacus, the novel that proves that propaganda can be art. This is great science fiction. Bit dewy-eyed about hunter-gatherers perhaps, but superb nonetheless. As an added bonus, it also has a title that sounds amusing today. Check out his short fiction, which includes a lot of SF/Fantasy work.
Michael Moorcock—Hawkmoon (1967–77, reprinted in one edition 1992)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL26331976M/Hawkmoon
Moorcock is an erudite Left-anarchist and a giant of fantasy literature. Almost everything he’s written is of interest, but Hawkmoon is chosen here in honor of Moorcock having said about it: “In a spirit consciously at odds with the jingoism of the day, I chose a German for a hero and the British for villains.” There are also plenty of satirical references and gags about 1960s/70s politics for the reader to decode.
William Morris—News From Nowhere (1888)
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3261
A socialist (though naively pastoral) utopia, written in response to Bellamy (above), that unusually doesn’t shy away from the hard political question of how we get the desired utopia-proletarian revolution. See also The Well at the World’s End and his other fantasies.
Toni Morrison—Beloved (1987)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL15059406W/Beloved
It’s well known that Beloved is a superb book about race and slavery and guilt, but it’s less generally accepted that it’s a fantasy. It is. It’s a ghost story that wouldn’t have half the charge without the fantastic element.
Mervyn Peake—The Gormenghast Novels (1946–59)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL784291M/The_Gormenghast_novels
An austere depiction of dead ritualism and necessary transformation. Don’t believe those who say that the third book is disappointing.
Marge Piercy—Woman on the Edge of Time (1976)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7563034M/Woman_on_the_Edge_of_Time
A Chicano woman trapped in an asylum makes contact with a messenger from a future utopia, born after a “full feminist revolution”.
Philip Pullman—Northern Lights (1995)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL29006W/Northern_Lights_(His_Dark_Materials_1)
Pullman let us down. This book is here because it deals with moral/political complexities with unsentimental respect for its (young adult) readers and characters. Explores freedom and social agency, and the question of using ugly means for emanicipatory ends. It raises the biggest possible questions, and doesn’t patronise us that there are easy answers. The second in the trilogy, The Subtle Knife, is a perfectly good bridging volume… and then in book three, The Amber Spyglass, something goes wrong. It has excellent bits, it is streets ahead of its competition… but there’s sentimentality, a hesitation, a formalism, which lets us down. Ah well. Northern Lights is still a masterpiece.
Ayn Rand—Atlas Shrugged (1957)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL731735W/Atlas_Shrugged
Know your enemy. This panoply of portentous Nietzcheanism lite has had a huge influence on American SF. Rand was an obsessive “objectivist” (libertarian pro-capitalist individualist) whose hatred of socialism and any form of “collectivism” is visible in this important an influential—though vile and ponderous—novel.
Mack Reynolds—Lagrange Five (1979)
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL8123075W/Lagrange_Five
Reynolds was, for 25 years, an activist for the U.S. Socialist Labor Party. His radical perspective on political issues is reflected throughout his work. This book—examining a quasi-utopia without sentimentalism—is only one suggestion. Also of huge interest are Tomorrow Might Be Different (1960) and The Rival Rigelians (1960), which explicitly examine the relation between capitalism and Stalinism.
Keith Roberts—Pavane (1968)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL9002799M/Pavane_(Millennium_SF_Masterworks_S)
These linked stories take place in a present day where Elizabeth I was assassinated and Spain took over Britain. This examines life in a world where a militant feudal Catholicism acts as a fetter on social and productive functions. Though Roberts was no lefty at all, and you could probably power France on the energy from his spinning grave at being included in this list.
Kim Stanley Robinson—The Mars Trilogy (1992–96)
http://libcom.org/library/mars-trilogy-kim-stanley-robinson
Probably the most powerful center of gravity for Leftist SF in the 1990s. A sprawling and thoughtful examination of the variety of social relations feeding into and leading up to revolutionary change. (It’s also got some Gramsci jokes in it.)
Mary Shelley—Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (1818)
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/mary-shelley/frankenstein
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/84
Not a warning “not to mess with things that should be let alone” (which would be a reactionary anti-rationalist message) but an insistence on the necessity of grappling with forces one unleashes and the fact that there is no “innate” nature to people, but a socially-constructed one.
Lucius Shepard—Life During Wartime (1987)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2409032M/Life_during_wartime
Horrific vision of a future (thinly disguised Vietnam) war. Within the savage examinations of the truth of war and U.S. foreign policy, Shepard also investigates the relation between SF, fantasy, and “magic realism”, and uses their shared mode to look back at reality with passion.
Norman Spinrad—The Iron Dream (1972)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7430983M/The_Iron_Dream
A SF novel by Adolf Hitler… Spinrad’s funny, disturbing and savage indictment of the fascist aesthetics in much genre SF and fantasy. What if Hitler had become a pulp SF writer in New York? Not a book about that possibility but a book from it. “By the same author: Triumph of the Will and Lord of the Swastika.” Brave and nasty.
Eugene Sue—The Wandering Jew (1845)
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3350
Huge book by radical socialist Sue, about the adventures of the family of the Wandering Jew of legend. Symbolic fantasy elements: the Jew is the dispossessed laborer and his partner is downtrodden woman. Marx hated Sue as a writer (not without reason—less, for Sue, is not in more) but hell, it’s an important book.
Michael Swanwick—The Iron Dragon’s Daughter (1993)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7878847M/The_Iron_Dragon%27s_Daughter
Great work that completely destroys the sentimental aspects of genre fantasy. From within the genre—fairies, elves, and all—Swanwick examines the industrial revolution, the Vietnam War, racism and sexism, and the escapist dreams of genre fantasy. A truly great anti-fantasy.
Jonathan Swift—Gulliver’s Travels (1726)
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/jonathan-swift/gullivers-travels
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/829
Savage attack on hypocrisy and cant that never dilutes its fantasy with its satire: the two elements feed off each other perfectly.
Alexei Tolstoy—Aelita (1922; trans. 1957)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL4256752M/Aelita
Distant relative of the other Tolstoy. The “revised” version is less good, written in the stern environment of Stalinism. A Red Army officer goes to Mars and foments a rebellion of native Martians. Good rousing stuff, but also interesting in terms of “exporting” revolution. See also the superb avant-garde film version from 1924.
Ian Watson—Slow Birds (1985)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7883229M/Slow_Birds
Left-wing author whose short story collection above includes a cold demolition of Thatcher and Thatcherism. His take on oppression—cognitive and political—informs all his rather austere, cerebral writing.
H.G. Wells—The Island of Dr Moreau (1896)
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/h-g-wells/the-island-of-doctor-moreau
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/159
Like a lot of Wells’s work, this is an uneasy mixture of progressive and reactionary notions. It makes for one of the great horror stories of all time. A fraught examination of colonialism, science, eugenics, repression, and religion: a kind of fantasy echo of Shakespeare’s The Tempest.
E. L. White—“Lukundoo” (1927)
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0606661h.html
One of the most utterly extraordinary (and almost certainly unconscious) expressions of colonial anxiety and guilt in the history of literature.
Oscar Wilde—The Happy Prince and Other Stories (1888)
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/902
Children’s fantasies by this romantic, socialist author. Marked by a sharp lack of sentimentality, a deeply subversive cynicism, which doesn’t blunt their ability to be intensely moving.
Gene Wolfe—The Fifth Head of Cerberus (1972)
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL1431525M/The_fifth_head_of_Cerberus
Wolfe is a religious Republican, but his tragico-Catholic perspective leads to a deeply unglamorized and unsanitized awareness of social reality. This book is a very sad and extremely dense, complex meditation on colonialism, identity and oppression.
Yevgeny Zamyatin—We (1920; trans. 1924)
http://libcom.org/library/we-yevgeny-zamyatin
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/yevgeny-zamyatin/we/gregory-zilboorg
A Bolshevik, who earned semi-official unease in the USSR even in the early 1920s, with this unsettling dystopian view of absolute totalitarianism. These days often retrospectively, ahistorically, and misleadingly judged to be a critique of Stalinism.
With many thanks to Mark Bould, Brian Stableford, and the members of the International Association for the Fantastic in the Arts email list (IAFA-L) for their suggestions. I take full responsibility for the final selection…
Comments
Quote: A Bolshevik, who
I see Mieville retains his SWP views, We was the first novel banned in the USSR possibly first book if you don't include pamphlets from political groups, and his career was effectively ended by its publication abroad. He had to apply for exile to Stalin in 1931 to be able to write again. A bit more serious than "semi-official unease".
It didn't get past the censors, it wasn't published in the USSR until 67 despite being written in the late 20s. And that publication was heavily censored, Bulgakov had written and burnt the manuscript several times over decades to avoid arrest. The "complete" version was published after his death in France as a Samizdat publication.
Reddebrek wrote: We was the
Reddebrek
According to the introduction from the Broadview Press edition of the book, We was only officially banned in the USSR in 1924 (Zamyatin tried to publish it already in 1921 but none of the Soviet publishers wanted to take it on, which is why he reached out to publishers in the West instead). Same source says Zamyatin was briefly detained in 1923, but it wasn't until 1929, during one of the first purges of the All-Russian Union of Writers (of which Zamyatin was a leading member in Leningrad), that he was officially condemned and all his works and not just We were banned.
So although I've seen this "first novel banned in the USSR" epitaph attached to it in other places, it's interesting if it's actually true (I'd be pleasantly surprised if no books had been banned before 1924!).
Thanks Jon and
Thanks Jon and reddebrek.
Could also add Robert Heinlein's Logic of Empire, which explains how to use economics to make people into slaves (as in indentured servants, company stores, scrip etc )
Salt by Adam Roberts.
Salt by Adam Roberts.
I think this is a pretty
I think this is a pretty sloppy list, as befits something thrown together by someone whose books are (if you ask me) all unreadable, aside from the excellent The City and the City. Aside from some of the choices themselves, it was curious to see The Rival Rigelians described as 'explicitly examin[ing] the relation between capitalism and Stalinism' (it does no such thing, explicity or otherwise, and is deathly boring to boot); and of Anarres as 'high-tech'.
Three books that would belong on a proper list (an updated one) are The Final Conflict, which can downloaded directly from libcom: https://libcom.org/library/last-conflict ; Hogan's Voyage from Yesteryear; and Doctorow's Walkaway.
Matiasz's 1% Free is reviewed on this site -- https://libcom.org/blog/review-1-free-maximumrocknroll-political-columnists-sci-fi-novel-31122016 -- but I am in the middle of the book, have not read the (presumably positive) review, and have nothing to say on the subject.
I was going to add Adam Roberts' Salt, but Serge Forward has beat me to the punch by a day. For those interested in knowing, the content is something to this effect as I recall:
Sixteen 'nations' (communities) set out from Earth (probably not ours) to settle a planet that was wrongly identified as being much more conducive to human inhabitation than it turns out to be.
Among the sixteen nations, one is highly monetarised (electoral system: you have as many votes as you pay for!), class-and-personally-hierarchic, and patriarchic. Another -- which entered the entourage through subterfuge -- is anarcho-communist. (Aside from 'hierarchic' -- used as term of abuse by the one side, and 'anarchist' -- used as term of abuse by the other -- there is little or no political language in the book.)
The two sides come into armed conflict.
The story, aside from the last chapter, is a series of accounts in chronological order told respectively by the leader of the propertarian side, and by the chief protagonist on the communist side. (This latter is no ideal person.)
Sometimes it's very funny.
I've only read We and Atlas
I've only read We and Atlas Shrugged on this list. Which of these books should I tear into first? Almost all the science fiction I've read has been Harlan Ellison.
Quote: I've only read We and
I'd recommend LeGuin's The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia for a light and interesting read. If you're into hard sci-fi, Robinson's Mars Trilogy is great (though be prepared for reading pages-long description of Martian geology, terraforming tech and techniques etc.).
Continuing from my post
Continuing from my post above, three more comments:
1) Another book fitting the description 'socialist science-fiction' is Wage Slave's Escape by (ex-)IWW member Mike Ballard (of Australia): https://www.amazon.com/Wage-Slaves-Escape-Michael-Ballard/dp/1312810971
2) Usually neglected, and unsurprisingly not mentioned by Mieville either, is Bellamy's second book: a decade after Looking Backward, he wrote Equality, which was so different from the first one that it was praised by Kropotkin*. (The book is without 'the industrial army' etc.) Equality can be read here: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7303
No doubt unaware that News from Nowhere was written against Looking Backward, Bellamy wrote a positive review of Morris' book (while questioning the absence of description of 'system' and 'administration' in the story's society) : https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bellamy-ed/works/1891/morris-news.htm .
sequence:
Bellamy's Looking Backward:1888
Morris' News from Nowhere: 1890
Bellamy's review of News from Nowhere: 1891
Bellamy's Equality: 1897
* Kropotkin quoted on this on page 191 of Patai: Looking Backward, 1988-1888 : Essays on Edward Bellamy, which can be seen here: https://archive.org/details/lookingbackward10000unse/page/190/mode/2up?q=Kropotkin
3) Matiasz's' 1% Free is in my view without any merit.
In the way of
In the way of socialist/communist science-fiction, two authors whose book I have not mentioned (because I have not personally read them) are Arkady-and-Boris Strugatsky, and Ivan Yefremov.
See here: https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2020s/2021/no-1405-september-2021/sci-fi-utopias-and-socialism
According to the…
According to the Encyclopedia of Science-Fiction, James Cooke Brown wrote a 'sf novel, 'The Troika Incident: A Tetralogue in Two Parts' (1970), [in which] astronauts from the USA, France and the USSR are shot forward by a century. There they discover a Utopia – built on lines that combine Edward Bellamy and William Morris, [...]'
Readers of this forum with an interest in planned languages will know James Cooke Brown as the inventor of Loglan, (whose uglier successor is Lojban). As for use of this language in his novel, according to another source: ' "In the story, the futuristic society uses a language called Panlan. But the blurb on the book jacket called it Loglan", says an associate's reminiscence about him.'
'Communist engineer' Nick…
'Communist engineer' Nick Chavez's on-the-whole not entirely positive review of a new piece of futuro-speculative fiction 'Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052-2072':
https://designformanufracture.wordpress.com/2023/01/25/review-everything-for-everyone-an-oral-history-of-the-new-york-commune-2052-2072-by-m-e-obrien-and-eman-abdelhadi/
Relatedly, Chavez has contributed two articles to the Mattick-edited section of Brooklyn Rail: 'The Present and Future of Engineers' and 'Technical Expertise and Communist Production'.
His other writings can be accessed from his homepage https://designformanufracture.wordpress.com .
There is also the novel …
[deletion of repeat of earlier comment]
I astoundingly notice only…
I notice only now that Mieville astoundingly does not include in his list Pataud and Pouget's 1909 'How we shall bring about the revolution'. How can this be? Because the authors were 'syndicalist' rather than 'socialist'? Or because of ignorance?
If you don't know the book, a review of it by Iain McKay here: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarcho-review-how-we-shall-bring-about-the-revolution .
I'm firmly in the Mieville…
I'm firmly in the Mieville critic's camp, but he probably doesn't know anything about it, I'm not a hundred percent sure he read many of the books that did make it onto his list given the incorrect information several of them have. Being written by French Syndicalists would make the work less appealing to the Trot art circles mind.
The book can be found here https://libcom.org/article/syndicalism-and-co-operative-commonwealth
I've read a few of Mieville…
I've read a few of Mieville's Fantasy books and they are okay. The Iron Council is the most political of the few I have read and it is entertaining enough but clearly reflective of his SWP politics -- it takes Marx's "revolutions are the locomotives of history" a bit too literally as well as reflecting the usual SWP take on anarchists (plus an uprising which is clearly inspired by the Paris Commune).
He also dislikes The Dispossessed as seen elsewhere, although his "critique" suggests that he has not really read it -- see my comments in Ursula Le Guin and Utopia.
I prefer Le Guin to Banks simply because the Culture is premised on a level of technology which is simply magic-like. Anarres is based on a level of technology which is realistic. Saying that, Banks' books are definitely worth reading -- his early death was a great loss.
Finally, Black Flag Anarchist Review Volume 3 Number 3 (Autumn 2023) has Morris, Kropotkin and Berneri on Edward Bellamy -- it can be found here
Not really the right thread…
Not really the right thread for this, but ...
'How might communism work? How can we approach this question with any rigor? What roles do industrial production, planning, and deliberative decision-making have in communism?'
FOREST AND FACTORY: THE SCIENCE AND THE FICTION OF COMMUNISM:
https://designformanufracture.wordpress.com/2023/12/18/forest-and-factory-the-science-and-the-fiction-of-communism