Though my analyses of class struggle, marxs writings and class relations i present a short explanation of the dictatorship of the proletariat.
The class dictatorship of the proletariat is not a state in the sense, rather it is a form of organization that is not a state, but an organization of the proletariat that wages a continuous and permanent struggle against the bourgeoisie and its mode of production, social order and all hitherto mode of activity and state of affairs. It is the organization of the proletariat to abolish classes and their economic basis. It is the organization of the proletariat to bring its self-abolition. But how can this not be a state? If the state is the organized rule of one class? When we speak that the class dictatorship of the proletariat is not a state, we mean merely that it is not a modern state, as the class dictatorship of the proletariat has nothing in common with the modern state. But what is the modern state? The modern state i.e the bourgeois state, is nothing but the organized rule of the bourgeois and thus a representation of the parasitic bourgeois social order. It can only be characterized as the bureaucratic state machine in which the parasitic relations of private property and bourgeois relations of production and its social order hold the totality of all the means of repression, authority, political representation ect ect. The class dictatorship of the proletariat has nothing in common with this parasitic state, we could characterize the class dictatorship of the proletariat as only “the proletariat at once proclaims its antagonism to the society of private property in the most decisive, aggressive, ruthless and forceful manner”-(Karl Marx, critical notes on the king of Prussia and social reform) Therefore the class dictatorship of the proletariat is nothing but the organization of the proletariat upon which this extreme aggression can be carried out on bourgeois society. But what exactly are the manners that the class dictatorship of the proletariat carries out on society? The revolutionary action of the proletariat can be nothing but simple communist measures as simple measures against capital, i.e the abolition of property, division of labor, exchange, value, classes and the state. These forceful measures can be nothing but simple communization. As the revolution very content itself must be communism. The ruthless manner can be nothing but the abolition of all hitherto mode of activity. The dictatorship of the proletariat is merely the organization of the revolutionary upheaval of the proletariat in the communist revolution to abolish classes. Without the class dictatorship of the proletariat, Without this revolutionary organization. The process upon which the proletariat can wage an intensification of clash struggle, the communist revolution can not succeed. Without the class dictatorship of the proletariat the abolish of all hitherto mode of activity, labor, and all hitherto classes and mode of production could not be carried out. The proletariat Without that organization would be split, unorganized and uncoordinated and will be swiftly crushed by all the counter-revolutionary means at the disposal of the capitalist class. Without the class dictatorship the revolutionary transformation of society could not take place. And if you have the class dictatorship of the proletariat subjected to Programmism, you merely have no longer a social revolution but a political revolution, a revolution, in the words of marx “which leaves the pillars of the building standing”-(critique of hegel's philosophy of right introduction) If a political soul takes the social soul out of the revolution no longer can the proletariat overthrow and abolish society and establish communism, it can only therefore overthrow the ruling power and replace it with the same class.
Comments