So I been trying to figure out where I land in communism and socialism. And I found that I agree with both Trotskyism and syndicalism. So is it possible for both of these ideologies be compatible?
How do you think it could be done? because syndicalism and parliamentarism/elections are two separate paths.
Syndicalism looks for an independent mass union movement to be ready for socioeconomic and political transformation through Industrial Unions.
Trotskyism basically looks to take control of the union movement and use it to take control of the State.
"I agree with both Trotskyism and syndicalism. So is it possible for both of these ideologies be compatible?"
I would say no. Although I am sure there are things to learn of trotskyism. And there have been some trotskyists who have evolved into libertarian socialists. See "Solidarity" who probably were the mail group to fully evolve and develop away from trotskyism to libertarian socialism and beyond. I highly recommend: https://libcom.org/article/solidarity-pamphlets and https://libcom.org/article/solidarity-journals-libcom
For a fast (yet very good) explanation of Solidarity's initial views of what libertarian socialism is, "As We See It": https://libcom.org/library/as-we-see-it-solidarity-group.
Trotsky and Cannon very early laid out their criticisms, which trotskyists still adhere to:
Leon Trotsky: "The Errors in Principle of Syndicalism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/unions/4-errors.htm
Leon Trotsky: "Communism and Syndicalism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/unions/3-commsyn.htm
I personally do not think the IWW is or has been anarcho-syndicalist or syndicalist, some do, and here are early 1930s American perspective on the IWW.
Jame Cannon: "American Syndicalism and Problems of Communism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1931/feb/syndic.htm
Well, Trotsky would not have agreed -- a few of his polemics were directed against syndicalism. A few were directed at Pierre Monatte, a revolutionary syndicalist who embraced Leninism for a while (he joined the French CP in 1923, expelled in 1924).
I fail to see how Trotskyism and Syndicalism can be combined. Trotsky advocated one-man management, syndicalism workers' control. Trotsky was in favour of the dictatorship of the party, syndicalism for workers' democracy. Trotsky sought party dominance over the unions, syndicalism union independence. The list is long.
Trotskyists generally think syndicalism is a stage on the way to Leninism, a somewhat backward ideology which is doomed. Most syndicalists who embraced Leninism ended up advocating ideas which they previously opposed.
Like everyone else, I would broadly tend to disagree, but also Trotskyism (especially) and syndicalism (maybe less so) are labels that have been used to describe a great deal of different things, so it's probably more helpful to describe exactly what you do and don't think is useful and go by that rather than by labels?
How do you think it could be…
How do you think it could be done? because syndicalism and parliamentarism/elections are two separate paths.
Syndicalism looks for an independent mass union movement to be ready for socioeconomic and political transformation through Industrial Unions.
Trotskyism basically looks to take control of the union movement and use it to take control of the State.
You can have Trotrskyists…
You can have Trotrskyists active in syndicalist unions, but they do have different conceptions of revolution and organisational ideas.
"I agree with both…
"I agree with both Trotskyism and syndicalism. So is it possible for both of these ideologies be compatible?"
I would say no. Although I am sure there are things to learn of trotskyism. And there have been some trotskyists who have evolved into libertarian socialists. See "Solidarity" who probably were the mail group to fully evolve and develop away from trotskyism to libertarian socialism and beyond. I highly recommend: https://libcom.org/article/solidarity-pamphlets and https://libcom.org/article/solidarity-journals-libcom
For a fast (yet very good) explanation of Solidarity's initial views of what libertarian socialism is, "As We See It": https://libcom.org/library/as-we-see-it-solidarity-group.
Trotsky and Cannon very early laid out their criticisms, which trotskyists still adhere to:
Leon Trotsky: "The Errors in Principle of Syndicalism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/unions/4-errors.htm
Leon Trotsky: "Communism and Syndicalism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/unions/3-commsyn.htm
I personally do not think the IWW is or has been anarcho-syndicalist or syndicalist, some do, and here are early 1930s American perspective on the IWW.
Jame Cannon: "American Syndicalism and Problems of Communism"
https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1931/feb/syndic.htm
Well, Trotsky would not have…
Well, Trotsky would not have agreed -- a few of his polemics were directed against syndicalism. A few were directed at Pierre Monatte, a revolutionary syndicalist who embraced Leninism for a while (he joined the French CP in 1923, expelled in 1924).
I fail to see how Trotskyism and Syndicalism can be combined. Trotsky advocated one-man management, syndicalism workers' control. Trotsky was in favour of the dictatorship of the party, syndicalism for workers' democracy. Trotsky sought party dominance over the unions, syndicalism union independence. The list is long.
The Bureaucracy in Exile: Trotsky’s limited Anti-Stalinism
Trotskyists generally think syndicalism is a stage on the way to Leninism, a somewhat backward ideology which is doomed. Most syndicalists who embraced Leninism ended up advocating ideas which they previously opposed.
If you find both ideas…
If you find both ideas agreeable and potentially compatible, then I don’t think you understand either of these ideas.
Like everyone else, I would…
Like everyone else, I would broadly tend to disagree, but also Trotskyism (especially) and syndicalism (maybe less so) are labels that have been used to describe a great deal of different things, so it's probably more helpful to describe exactly what you do and don't think is useful and go by that rather than by labels?