International Union of Anarchists?

While I suppose they m are well-intentioned and in Israel and perhaps a few places there are some groups,but in others it is just some individual members, so I wouldn't call it a proper international of organizations. I suppose some of them are trying to organize around Russian diaspora. Don't have any political criticism of them, but did attend a talk by one guy and found it to be mythology in the making and I felt he was trying to mislead people. (Big time! And he took much more time to tell his stories than anybody in much larger organizations.) As I said, it isn't really functioning groups in some places. But of course not opposed to their organizing efforts if they act like a normal anarcho-communist federation.

http://iua.an-com.org/faq-iua says:

The IUA was established in an effort aimed to keep connection between the sections after the breakup of RCAS. The question of joining to IFA was raised at the begining. But for now there are a lot of new activists, who don't know enough about IFA, and it would be foolish to drag them thereto. We don't deny a probability of merger of our organizations later on (if the principles and goals will be identic).

from their English-language stuff, it seems that they are basically confined to the former Soviet Union and its Diaspora

It would be good if anarcho-communists and more revolutionary anarchists organized outside of IFA. IFA is sort of dragged down by its synthesist elements. They might be in a minority in fact these days, but seem to have quite a lot of influence.

It would be good if anarcho-communists and more revolutionary anarchists organized outside of IFA. IFA is sort of dragged down by its synthesist elements. They might be in a minority in fact these days, but seem to have quite a lot of influence.

IFA is sort of dragged down by its synthesist elements.

Akai, you are not only completely inaccurate but totally sectarian. Clueless or what :roll:

Klasbatalo you are correct. In fact, I'm not even sure if there are any individualists left.

We need an International of Internationals!

There are lots of different political ideas floating around in some parts of the IFA and strange things that the IFA does not want to deal with (insurrectionalists, incident in Bulgaria). Either English speakers are clueless about what these issues with some groups' politics or they are being defensive and misleading. By the way, I already know the answers to this comment since I know which people are on this forum and already saw how they avoid issues by reaching for their poor armament of political names. I made no particular reference to individualists.

Heard it all before, Akai. You made a snidey comment but you have form for this sort of thing.