This is a topic which l will open now but will contribute to more concretely only after a re-read, when l have time.
While there is some discussion about the publishing of the sequel to Black Fame, whose proponents have claimed is a great book, l recall that others have questioned its historical accuracy on a number of points.
Besides this question, there were some issues around the bias of the book.
Maybe it would be helpful to have a thread on this. Then all the points can be found in one place, instead of popping up in various threads.