Man films factory walkout, gives the most enthusiastic narration you've ever heard

Since my recent visit to the Americas I speak in exactly the same vernacular as the splendid fellow on the video. Spiffing stuff, er, I mean dat muthafucka speaking da real shit, bitch!

Yeah, it's a great moment, and nice to see people sharing their own stories - there's an interview with the narrator here for more background.

Thanks RT, this is fabulous...

Antoine Dangerfield said

As the yoof be saying, “word”

Did I misread the whole thing or did the walkout happen along race lines?! Perhaps I'm misreading it but it sounds as if the narrator is on the outside of the whole thing and that only the hispanics are in on it? Not very heartening if that's the case.

These days they're saying 'lit" or something like that...

Not quite. I'd wondered about this as well, but it's sounds both a bit more complicated and not actually bad at all. With only the video and the Jacobin interview to go on, you have to extrapolate a bit, so I could equally be reading wrong, but this is what I got from it.

So I think (this could be wrong, but is how I read it):

1.The work site is divided up by different contractors.
2. All of the employees of the contractor walked off the job after the group of a handful from that contractor were fired. They stopped work, had a meeting to discuss it, then physically walked out of the site. It sounds like the workers who walked out had a meeting at the level of the contractor, not the entire worksite.
3. Not sure about this bit, but sounds like the bosses then sent everyone else home for the day as well, and they all got paid - per the second interview excerpt.
4. The racist supervisor got sacked (as did Dangerfield).

So from that, the original dispute, sackings, mass meeting and walkout all took place within the framework of a single contractor, on a very large multi-contractor work site. That contractor was employing almost entirely (or all?) latino workers but they may not have been the only latino workers there.

However, all the workers for that contractor walked out. Then, it sounds like everyone else stopped work (voluntarily or not), and the entire work site was shut down for the day.

I don't think in this sense it's much different to a 1960s/70s car industry wildcat (per Glaberman). Where there's a dispute with a foreman in one department, the workers in that department shut the line down, and the rest of the factory stops work within a few minutes/hours. With the car factory example the rest of the factory just cannot physically work if one department stops, even though they have not consciously gone on strike, because there is no work to do. With this construction site it sounds like other workers not directly involved stopped work (to film, discuss it etc. - Dangerfield shows the completely silent building in the film) and then did not return to work, even if they didn't make a conscious decision to walk out as such.

Whether there were interdependencies between contractors that would physically prevent people from continuing to work, or whether bosses didn't want people to sit around discussing wildcat strikes the rest of the day, is an open question. Also whether people would have kept working if they'd been allowed to.

It's quite possible the overall building contractor system is dividing the workforce up along racial lines, but from the interview and the video it sounds like things all happened quickly enough that there wasn't the opportunity to for the strike to be explicitly divided along racial lines in terms of scabbing or anything.

The main determining factor in it looking divided along racial lines is that the original group of contractors didn't explicitly bring in other workers for the original walkout, but then they took a quick decision and shut the entire place down anyway (with active support from at least Dangerfield), so that wasn't strategically necessary for them to win the strike at all.

If I'd done an interview, I'd definitely have wanted to ask that question, and I would not entirely rule out Jacobin glossing over limitations like that, because I don't trust Jacobin in general.

So you could say that Dangerfield should have physically walked out of the building with the other workers, but he'd stopped work, filmed it with commentary, shown the entire worksite shut down, then posted the video for millions to watch - i.e. he'd still stopped work in solidarity.

There appears to be several ambiguities regarding this story. Over the years I had a few run-ins with UK ‘safety officers’.

This person described as a racist and called a safety officer/person, would be a tool of management, though that being the case, he was not a foreman or production supervisor. He would be there basically to cover the ass of his employers in the case of an event, which would give rise to a compensation claim by employees or a criminal type prosecution by the authorities.

In this role he would be popular with very few people. The role is contradictory, as management wish production to proceed unimpeded, while being able to deny any responsibility for mishaps (the blame being shifted onto the workers). Local management prefer to turn a blind eye to safety infractions if they would result in delays or extra costs. The last thing wanted is anyone to bring problems to light. In the case of this video, both the safety officer and the fellow who took the video broke this golden rule. So both were expendable minions.

I could give examples from experience of this shit. As a young fool I was sometimes encouraged to work without scaffolding, climb ladders that were not lashed, and work off roofing girders without any safety harness. Three times that I know of, our management was threatened with prosecution (our plant department ‘lost’ two plumbers in the space of about eighteen months for identical infractions). The story was always ‘next time we will take you to task’.

The question I wish had been asked is, “What was the safety guy videoing that no one wishes to talk about?”

Most workers rightly see ‘safety officers’ is spies, as no one wants to be caught with a bare bum.

It's not uncommon for different contractors or even skill sets in the construction industry to become dominated by a single nationality/background. Presumably even more so in USA? So that's a plausible explanation Mike. The framing of the whole thing by the narrator did make it seem like a race issue though.

Yeah there's a base level black nationalism there and the one thing the interviewer does that is good is link that back to class.

Spiffing stuff, er, I mean dat muthafucka speaking da real shit, bitch!

You were right the first time - spiffing stuff!

Yeah, I clicked ban as spammer, because apparently I can, and I thought he was a spammer. "They" were literally just repeating fragments of what other people had said in threads.

Yeah, having looked at other posts it does look kind of spammy. Weird spam though!

Wouldnt advise googling his name either unless you don't plan on sleeping tonight

I searched it and found nothing, but I think I left safesearch on, probably for the best.

We have had spambots before that copy snatches of previous posts. I am not sure why they bother with ones like this. Might be someone playing at a turing test machine.

Zugzwang

Obviously I looked it up too after you suggested I shouldn’t(I’m fucking well punk, right?). Couldn’t find anything either and now my curiosity is fucking with me badly. Send me a link, eh? Thanks.

Google gives me creepy-ass doll guy, guess 'cause their names are close.