If anyone needs some high-octane excitement, they don't seem to have posted it here yet, but the Angry Workers lot have recently reviewed the new Endnotes, and come out with some pretty strong critiques of the Endnotes brand of communisation as being essentially a reflection of neoliberal atomisation: https://angryworkersworld.wordpress.com/2020/04/20/endnotes-no-5-a-melancholic-goodbye-to-neoliberalism-and-the-era-of-communisation/
I haven't read Endnotes 5 so
I haven't read Endnotes 5 so I can't comment directly on how good the polemic actually is but i really like how they(edit: AWW) reference their own practice and experiences. Other polemics within the "ultraleft" milieu often just feels like it turns into a Marx-quoting war without much regard for what they are actually saying means in reality, especially the ones that happened in Riff-Raff after Marcel left.
I haven't read Endnotes 5
I haven't read Endnotes 5 either (or the arguments that happened in Riff-Raff for that matter), but if you're referring to AWW I fully agree, I really appreciate the way they link up their big picture analysis with day-to-day practice and experiences.
Interesting... and maybe a
Interesting... and maybe a ''working class party'' of a different kind to that of the past or the present so far ...gets a surprising mention this time. Might upset those anarchists who claim they were the first 'communisers'.
To be fair even Mario Tronti
To be fair even Mario Tronti writes a lot about the creation of a real working-class party, not as an electoral formation but as a social force that can overthrow capitalism. With its paper being the inverse of what Lenin described as the "collective organizer".