An anarchist expropriator in England in 1921

A very short account of the trial of an anarchist burglar called Arthur Richards.

Author
Submitted by Battlescarred on December 19, 2012

The following account gives an idea of the pressure many unemployed workers had to face in a period in Britain of mass unemployment with very little in the way of social welfare, and the determination of some to resist hunger and poverty.

Arthur Thomas Richards was arrested by the police at 2.15 am on November 29th 1921 at East Mitcham in Surrey wearing a pair of thick socks over his boots, and equipped with a hammer, screw-driver and wire cutter. Appearing in court at the Surrey Sessions, the defendant, aged 37, refused to recognise the authority of the court saying,: “I plead nothing to this court. I don’t recognise its authority. I am an Anarchist-Communist”. He refused to take the oath, commenting: “I don’t think almighty God has anything to do with this court”, and objected to the jury, saying that he did not know any of them. Explaining his actions he said: ”What else could I do? I am out of work, and don’t intend to starve.”

Sentenced to hard labour for six months Richards responded with “a cheery smile”. Before he was taken down he remarked: “I can easily do that, as I was for five years on the Brighton Railway”.

Source:
Evening Telegraph, Angus, Scotland

Comments

westartfromhere

9 months ago

Submitted by westartfromhere on March 15, 2025

Wonder if he would have got more or less time if he hadn't pleaded, “I plead nothing to this court. I don’t recognise its authority. I am an anarchist-communist”. I'm guessing less.

For "going equipped" under Section 25 of the Theft Act 1968, the maximum sentence is three years' imprisonment if tried in the Crown Court, or six months if tried in the Magistrates' Court.

Steven.

8 months 1 week ago

Submitted by Steven. on April 7, 2025

What a cool story. But do you think his quote was supposed to say "I worked for 5 years"?