A biographical sketch of Josep Rebull, 1906/1999 - Agustín Guillamón

Agustín Guillamón's short biography of Josep Rebull, POUM militant and opponent of that party's collaboration with the Catalan government during the Spanish Revolution. Originally an introductory part of "La izquierda del POUM en Mayo de 1937: Militancia y pensamiento político de Josep Rebull"

Submitted by Dannny on November 25, 2010

Josep Rebull Cabré was born in Tivissa (Tarragona) in 1906. His entry into social struggles followed the example of his older brother, the well known POUM militant Daniel Rebull (“David Rey”)1 He was 11 when arrested for the first time, in his brother’s house in Barcelona, as a result of the general strike of 1917.2 He joined the Communist Party in Tarragona in 1927, during the Primo de Rivera dictatorship, while completing his military service. In 1932 he was a militant, and one of the founders, of the Bloc Ober i Comperol (BOC – The Workers and Peasants Bloc) in Tarrasa. After effective work in the press of that organization he participated in the founding of the POUM [The Workers’ Party of Marxist Unification – a fusion of the BOC with the Izquierda Communista de España, The Spanish Communist Left] in Las Planas in September 1935.3 In February 1936 he appeared on the electoral lists of the POUM in Tarragona.

During the revolutionary events of 19 July 1936, Rebull took part in the street fighting in Barcelona’s Plaça Catalunya with a group of a hundred militants, among whom were Carmel Rosa (‘Roc’), Rovira, Algemir, Vidal etc. Despite finding himself next to Germinal Vidal, secretary of the Iberian Communist Youth (JCI) who was killed in a confrontation with a military squad with whom they were parleying in the Plaza de Universidad, Rebull escaped unharmed.

Taking over the administration of the requisitioned press of the Catalan El Correo, Rebull organised the press of the POUM and the output of the Editorial Marxista. Gaston Davoust, leader of the French group Union Communiste, spent three weeks in Barcelona, in the months of August and September 1936, during which time he carried out various interviews with anarchist leaders and the POUM, and began his friendship with Josep Rebull.

On 21 July the CNT and the POUM supported the formation in Cataluña of the Central Committee of Antifascist Militias (CCMA) in which representatives of the bourgeois parties also participated. On 26 September Andreu Nin, political secretary of the POUM, without consulting the party membership, accepted the post of Ministry of Justice in the government of the Generalitat, retaining the position until his expulsion on 13 December as a result of Stalinist pressure. 1 October 1936 produced the self-dissolution of the CCMA, on 9 October the Generaliat, with the participation of the POUM and the CNT, decreed the dissolution of the local committees that were to be substituted by Popular Front local governments. On 13 October a decree elaborated and signed by Nin himself swept away the revolutionary work of Barriobero in the justice tribunals, on 24 October he approved the decrees of militarization of the Peoples’ Militias and the control of public order by a Council of Internal Security.

In January of 1937 Nin wrote to the Central Executive of the Socialist Party (PSOE) proposing the participation of the POUM in the conferences of unification between the PSOE and the PSE.4 Only a few days later the Stalinist repression against the poumistas began in Madrid.5

Tarradellas promulgated a battery of economic and financial decrees, known as the Decrees of S’Agaró, that began the Generalitat’s offensive to take control of the collectivized companies. At the beginning of March the decree on Public Order, and the dissolution of the ‘Control Patrols’, rejected by the CNT, sparked a long and serious crisis in the Generalitat. The day to day life of the workers was affected by the rising cost of living, the ration queues and the scarcity of basic products. March and April 1937 saw multiple confrontations in various parts of Cataluña between anarchist militants and the forces of the Generalitat and the PSUC; among the most notable occurred in Bellver de Cerdaña. A struggle began between militants of the CNT, partisans of collectivization and workers´ control, and the interventionism of the Generalitat, precipitated by the decrees of S’Agaró.6 Workers assemblies in the factories were frequent, albeit limited by the presence of the forces of public order.7

In March 1937 a wide section of POUM militants protested the lack of internal discussion and the most recent postponement of their congress, which had been put off in December 1936, February '37, and again in March. In March and April the weekly meetings of the political secretaries and the organization of the district committees, in which the cells of the party were organized, expressed the discontent of the rank and file. Thus the local committee (CL) of Barcelona became a strong body of opposition to the POUM leadership, calling for the congress and beginning a debate about political work at the front, which went against the rules about the formation of cells in the militia, and also about the participation of the party in a bourgeois government, supposedly against the strategy hitherto followed by the Central Executive (CE).8 On 13 April, as the culmination of these acts of protest, the product of widespread unrest at the militant grassroots of the party, a meeting was held between the CL of Barcelona and the Central Committee, at which Josep Martí, secretary of the CL, and Josep Rebull achieved approval for and wide distribution of the manifesto of the Barcelona CL, published in La Batalla on 15 April.9 This contained reference to the crisis of the Generalitat, criticizing the collaboration of the POUM with that government, and calling for the formation of a Revolutionary Workers’ Front that would enshrine workers’ councils as organs of power. It also announced the new convocation of the 2nd Congress of the party for 8 May, to give plenty of opportunity for the publication and distribution in the internal bulletins of the counter-theses of the different cells to the official theses of the CE.

On 16 April Nin attended a meeting of the Barcelona CL at which he managed to prevent the publication of a leaflet against the official line of the party. According to Nin they should not have been speaking of soviets but of union government.10

Josep Rebull was the secretary of Cell 72 in Barcelona. The counter argument signed by Cell 72 (some 12 activists) that was published in the discussion bulletin of the 2nd Congress, edited by the Barcelona CL, was his work and did not spark but rather picked up on, deepened and theorised the contradictions and protests of the POUM’s militant grassroots against the political strategy of the CE. That it was signed 'Cell 72' rather than Josep Rebull was due simply to the requirements of the congress rules.

During the May days, Rebull was taken hostage by a Stalinist squad. He made three chief interventions in the events of those days, but he never called for the comrades of the CNT to take power, as affirmed in ‘The Spanish Civil War. The View from the Left’11 but limited himself to posing this question to the CE of his own party.
These three interventions were:
An interview between Cell 72 and the Friends of Durruti Group (FOD) on the night of 4 May, at which it was decided not to take any initiative given the minority character of both organizations, and because they considered that the action the CNT were to take would be decisive.
An interview with the CE of the POUM: Nin, Andrade and Gorkin, at which, with a map of Barcelona in his hand, he demonstrated the certainty of a military victory if the POUM decided to attack the government buildings in the centre of the city, to which the CE responded that they were dealing with a political rather than a military question: the taking of power would mean breaking anti-fascist unity and precipitate a rapid victory for Franco’s army.
Ceding the POUM printing press to the FOD on 8 May so that they, no longer authorized by the CNT, could put out a manifesto that drew a balance sheet of the recent events.

The serious events of these days, from 3 to 7 May, made it impossible to convoke the POUM congress, again postponed until 19 June, in time for the international conference which was to be meeting on 19 July. The political tactics of the CE were widely criticized by a wide sector of its militants and Andreu Nin was probably on the point of being dismissed from his post as secretary. With the repression against the POUM, triggered on 16 June, the party closed ranks and the critics of the collaborationist policy, given the impossibility of convening the 2nd Congress, were provisionally silent.

Rebull found himself isolated as the rest of the members of Cell 72 failed to stick by their positions. Consequently, with the possibility of convening a congress definitively ruled out, the so called Left of the POUM in Barcelona had only one militant at the beginning of 1938: Josep Rebull.12 For one year he lived clandestinely in Barcelona, occupying alternately Joaqín Maurín's flat on Carrer Padua or a rented room on Carrer Llibreteria. Until April he was continuously active in the editing and distribution of the POUM’s clandestine press; as well as in giving solidarity and help to prisoners through assiduous visits to Irujo, the Minister of Justice, to achieve the transfer of POUM militants from the Stalinist Cheka prisons (where they could disappear without trace) to Republican prisons. But with the omnipresent Stalinist repression against POUM militants, and the growing difficulty in avoiding military enrolment, he was enlisted in the army under a false name at the end of 1938.

Josep Rebull was never won to Trotskyism. Proof is to be found in his uninterrupted militancy in the POUM and his membership of the CE in exile until 1953, when he tended his resignation.13
The episode of the Committee of Defence of the 2nd Congress of the POUM, in July 1939, halfway between the end of the civil war and the beginning of World War 2, although it involved the cropping up of a Bolshevik-Leninist group in the POUM, and a certain collaboration of this group with Rebull, was neither serious nor prolonged enough to win Rebull to the Fourth International.
The thesis defended by Cell 72, that cannot be categorized as either Trotskyist or Councilist, highlighted the contradiction in the CE of the POUM between theory and practice, as, according to Rebull, it theorized the formation of a workers’ government while at the same time sustaining and strengthening the bourgeois government of the Generalitat.

On 27 September 1985, at the seminar on historical studies commemorating the 50th anniversary of the founding of the POUM, in Ca l’Ardiaca in Barcelona, Rebull intervened in the heated debate where the majority of POUM militants accused Pierre Broué14 (I believe unfairly) of providing a Trotskyist critique of the POUM: 'Broué has not come to flatter anybody but to point out the failure of the POUM as a revolutionary organization, that was born with so many hopes, that through the years became blurred, shedding parts of its programme at each corner of its history. There is nothing more stubborn than the facts, and the POUM did fail as a revolutionary party. I agree with the analysis that a revolutionary organization cannot go beyond what is allowed by the revolutionary situation and the revolutionary spirit of the masses. But the POUM, as Cell 72 analysed at the time, failed as a revolutionary vanguard.' The words of Rebull were like a bell ringing, inviting a revolutionary critique of the mistakes made by the POUM in the civil war; however they were barely heard in the uncomradely mess of personalized conflict between the old poumistas, in favour or against entryism to the PSOE, and indeed sounded a little ‘eccentric’ in the midst of so much point missing. The person of Josep Rebull, who never renounced his critiques of 1937-9, and the great political value of his thought are reflected in a sentence uttered at the above event, that sum up his militant trajectory and his (personally painful) valuation of the POUM never having been a revolutionary party: 'It would have been better for us militants of the POUM to have been executed as revolutionaries before a firing squad, than have been judged as traitors to the Republic.'

Having crossed the French border in February 1939, Rebull spent some months in Paris in the house of Gaston Davoust ('H. Chazé'). After the Nazi invasion he was in Marseilles for two years, living underground and without papers, with exiled Italian Bordiguists such as Mitchell, Marco and Tuilo, people of great solidarity and no less intransigence in their political analysis. For some months he worked, like so many other exiles of the extreme left of all nationalities, in the confiture factory Croque-Fruit, managed by Trotskyists. While in Marseilles he became friends with the writer Jean Malaquais, his neighbor in Air-Bel. In the summer of 1943 he collaborated with the French Resistance, until his arrest by the Gestapo and his eventual liberation in 1944. During his long French exile he got by as the administrator of a small publishing house and a journalist for Franc-Tireur, which later adopted the new name of Paris Jour.

Rebull was a member of the CE of the POUM in exile until May 1953, when he tendered his resignation as a result of political disagreements with the remainder of the body.15 From then on he remained as a grassroots member, although more and more removed from active militancy, while nevertheless remaining interested in political and economic analysis.

Rebull had a good innings. Long since retired in the beautiful Rosellón village of Banyuls-sur-mer, he died in his 90s on 22 May 1999.

  • 1There is a photo in which “David Rey” appears together with Trotsky, already in Mexico in January 1937. Daniel Rebull participated in all the social struggles from 1915 to franquismo, in the CNT, BOC and the POUM. He spent long periods in jail, 19 years throughout his life. Condemned to death under Franco, his sentence was later commuted.
  • 2The detention of a minor caused a scandal and made the newspapers at the time.
  • 3Josep Rebull affirms that the foundation of the POUM took place in September 1935 in Las Planas (a popular picnic site close to Barcelona). Francisco De Cabo presents a different version. The versions are not contradictory but refer to two different and complimentary foundational acts of the POUM, one of a mass character, in which the militants of the BOC approved the foundation of the POUM, as narrated by Rebull, and the other more restricted and informal, in which militants of the BOC and ICE met, as related by De Cabo.
  • 4Andreu Nin: 'To the Executive Commission of the Socialist Party. (Barcelona, 22nd January 1937)'.
  • 5The Stalinist repression against the POUM starts in Madrid” in La Batalla (9th February 1937).
  • 6Monjo Omedes, Anna, ‘La CNT durant la II República a Barcelona: líders, militants, afiliats’ doctoral thesis, Barcelona, 1994.
  • 7Vega, Carme and Monjo, Anna; Vilanova, Mercedes: 'Socialización y Hechos de Mayo: una nueva aportación a partir del proceso a Mauricio Stevens (2 de junio 1937)'. Historia y fuente oral n. 3 (1990).
  • 8Correspondence between “Negrete” [Russell Blackwell] and “Oehler, 1936-37 [exact photocopies of the letters written by “Negrete”, the majority to “Oehler”, dated Barcelona between 26/11/36 and 4/11/37]. Access to documentation facilitated by Andy Durgan, for whose generosity we are grateful.
  • 9This manifesto is reproduced in Balance, n. 19.
  • 10See the positions defended by Nin in the article reproduced as an annexe to Balance, n. 20.
  • 11Revolutionary History, 4: 1-2
  • 12In number 3 of La Voz Leninista (Feb 38) Munis strongly criticised the political action of Rebull because, while acknowledging the correctness of his political positions and his critique of the CE of the POUM, he never broke with the organisation. In Munis’s opinion, Rebull lacked the decisiveness to follow his ideas to their logical conclusion, the courage to break with the POUM and join the 4th International.
  • 13Rebull always claimed to third parties to have had health problems, to justify a resignation that had an exclusively political character, albeit with a shade of “personalized” struggle with other comrades of the party, which he wanted to hide or minimize for reasons of modesty typical of his personality.
  • 14There is a written critique of Broués intervention in Ignacio Iglesias, 'Some notes on the paper presented by Professor Pierre Broué in the study seminar organized for the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the POUM'. This article was published in Fundació Andreu Nin: Notes for the History of the POUM (Barcelona, 1989).
  • 15Josep Rebull, 'Letter to the CE of the POUM' (Paris, 19/5/53).



2 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Alf on May 1, 2021

The ICC published Rebull's article on the May days of 1937, with a critical introduction: