I've mentioned this to a couple of youse, from the libcom crew. But i can't find anything on the site. So here goes, has anyone written anything about the progression from ayn-libcom, or even a short history of how it all developed, as from what i've read an who i've met, you're all pretty young, that's not a putdown, the opposite infact. It's just there was no dedicated youth group in my day (which wasn't all that long ago). As an example in spain you have the FIJL, is there a need for anarchist youth groups, i kind of think there should be, infact i wish there had been when i was younger.
Can someone move this to theory for me?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
The AYN is now defunct, right? Why did that happen and what's being done to create a replacement? A youth network is pretty damn necessary.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
It appears that their website is still live, though :D
http://flag.blackened.net/ayn/Ideas/stopschool.htm
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
I am an admin here, and am proud to say I had nothing whatsoever to do with the AYN!
Having said that, a few of the ex-AYNers have indeed written a history and explanation of what it was, where it went, why they feel it failed, and what lessons those writing it feel they should pass on to the next set of people trying to set up an anarchist youth organisation.
I'll get people involved to reply here when I contact them next.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
In my personal opinion the AYN was a bit shite and i quickly got fed up with it. However, it seems to have drawn in some people who're still actively involved so maybe it wasn't completely pointless.
i don't think the UK needs a youth group. There are already 3 national feds, why do we need another one?
I was well involved in the
I was well involved in the AYN, it was shite, met a load of cool peeps though, will write something more later...
:)
OK, here's a short history of
OK, here's a short history of what happened...
A load of us that had been posting on the maydaywhiteoveralls list (the old Wombles one) got together and had a meeting in central London and started the network, the majority of the libcom admins were at that first meeting, we then started meeting now and then and were mainly just going on demo's and trying to produce propaganda. We had a fairly active e-mail list and produced a load of a leaflets, a one off newsletter, and we had a fairly good website but all we really did was walk around dressed in black on demo's.
The AYN was always a fairly loose network with very little theoretical unity, there was quite a big red vs. greens split (most of the libcom admins were on the red side ;)) which I think held the network back a lot. Enrager.net then got started by one of us, the AYN web forum was hosted on it, but then the AYN fizzled out and those of us who're now doing the site decided to form a class struggle anarchist collective that would do a number of things such as screen printing t-shirts, making flags, and running this site.
This site has been the most successful of all the things we've done, and we haven't really done much else recently, we decided to change the name from enrager.net to libcom.org partly because it reflects the development of our politics.
:)
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
gawkrodger
gawkrodger
Maybe you anwered your own question?
It's just a sound off gawk, it can't really be recreated, an like you've said parts were shit, but what's come out of it is good.
On the other 3 feds, they're not really accesible to most people, let alone the youth.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Brighton Bomber
Why not? They have addresses don't they?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
as well as the email list, the ayn had a total of three summer gatherings. the first one was awesome in the radical dairy, we decided loads of stuff, very little of which actually got done in the end, i guess because people lost interest or something. like Tommy Ascaso said, most activity seemed to consist of dressing up in black on demos. if all the people who'd got in touch with the ayn had come and dressed up in black on the demos, we'd actually have had quite a big black block, but unfortunately (or fortunately) that never happened, i don't think there were ever more than 20 or maybe 30 max ayners on a demo.
the second ayn gathering was a total fiasco. it was in some squat near marble arch, which was well posh, but most of the people there weren't even vaguely interested in the ayn, shit though it was, the meetings had no direction, and the only one people seemed to show much interest in was the reds v. greens debate. basically it was a piss up masquerading as a meeting, and it was shit. also, that was where i first ate rice with a spanner that i was convinced was a screwdriver.
the third and last ayn gathering was last summer, and in birmingham for a change. it happened pretty much purely because i thought it would be amusing to have an ayn gathering in a nursery, and convinced brum activists to help me squat it. i think there were about 8 of us. it was nice enough, and at least we didn't make big grand plans, but none of the little things we decided on doing happened other than a small zine called black kitten. people just lost interest completely, but i think most people there were involved in stuff already, and still are.
although it was quite enjoyable, i met loads of cool people, and it probably helped me get involved in stuff, i don't really think there is a need for a seperate youth organisation. i suspect if there hadn't been the ayn i'd have met most of the people i did anyway, and it seems daft to seperate the struggles of "young" people from the rest of the population, especially when i don't think there's really that much intimidation of younger militants by older ones, if anything it's more the other way around. also, apart from the problem of defining who is eligible to be "youth", any such organisation inevitably has a high turnover, unless you have the dodgy situation of revo of it being controlled by a bunch of old men in some other organisation.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
GenerationTerrorist
more or less what i would say in answer to BB
I'm amazed the lack of organisation/lack of belief in the need for organisation was also pretty endemic.
Finally, just for the record i'd like to point out i only have one piece of black clothing, a grey and black hoody
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
I just thought I'd say, I pretty much agree with Tommy Ascaso and gen terror on what they said about AYN. I enjoyed being in AYN and I think it helped me, but as people have said there wasn't any theoretical unity and such.
If it wasn't for AYN I dont think I could ever say I saw someone eat rice with a spanner though.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
is that thread still around from the last AYN gathering? that was fucking hysterical :) :)
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
I assume it got deleted with the rest of the stuff on the AYN board here.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
I don't get the point of a youth network, surely if somebody is mature enough to have fully worked out, coherent political ideas, there's no reason they should be compartmentalised into some faction for da yoot?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
I loved the AYN. I went to the second gathering and I thought it was the best thing ever. It definately helped shape my politics a lot and I met a bunch of cool people too. I think, personaly when I found it, it looked a lot more appealing than the other fed sites. Maybe it shouldn't have anything to do with age but I was 14 when I got into anarchism and the AYN just seemed "really cool yeah awesome" compared to some others.
Plus I had a rad 15th birthday and got to watch GT eat food with a spanner.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
so we can summarise the achievements of the ayn as:
- it was fun for a bit
- we met some cool people
- people got to see me eating food with a spanner
oh, and i almost forgot, i would never have made hardcore riot porno volume 1, raising nearly £300 for prisoners, if i hadn't been in the ayn.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
have you got any riot porn left?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
my friend should have the last 5 videos somewhere, i'm meeting him tonight, i'll ask him what he's done with them. but i think they're reserved by class war, but you can always get somr off them. i'm debating whether to make volume 2 actually, i have some good stuff to put on it, and it's good practice for producing and stuff, but last time it took all fucking summer, so unless i find a better program to stick it together with i'm not sure i can be bothered. apart from the time it was a good way of raising money though...
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
looking at from outside i always thought AYN was a good idea - sure most of their plans didnt come to much - but the fact so many of them are still involved is a testament to some success
there is probably a need for an anarchist youth group, but the only people who can set one up are young anarchos
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
you mean like grace & jess?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
oisleep
banding together for mutual protection from jack would be a sensible precaution yes
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
kalabine
or just banding together for the sheer hell of it!
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Jack
Sign me up!
Perhaps us new, COOL kids can see the need for controlling gender ratios even if you old folks can't.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Jess
What we need is an all new girly AYN - me, you, grace and shoes...
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Jack
And talk about knitting and kittens and controlling gender ratios!
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Thora
And me!
Or am I too old...and male? :cry:
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
The problem of you maleness can be quickly solved with a sharp knife. Still want to join?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
...and I was so in favour of a new anarchist group until a couple of seconds ago.
I'm off to join a proper organisation; The Anarchist Federation!! 8)
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Jess
You can alter my DNA with a knife?
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Volin
that would be a sensible choice :wink:
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Thora
Kittens!! I'm calling mine rabbi
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Yeah a history of it is not written but it is being done. I was involved in AYN, and found out there had been an AY Federation in the 80s or something, but they didn't write anything about their experiences and I bet we repeated all their mistakes - which were basically the mistakes of anarchists in the UK generally - no formal organisation, class analysis, theoretical unity, or any fucking clue what to do at all really!
I didn't even get to see anyone eat food with a spanner... Still I learnt a fair bit about organisation, and radical movements in general.
At its peak in London we had 30-40 people a fortnight at meetings, and about 12 local "groups", which mostly existed on paper only. AFAIK almost everyone were just people who came along cos it was "cool" or something, and all who remain of it are the the Manchester AYN group who now populate this forum's NW section, GT and some of the libcom group.
I thought that old site had been deleted, cos we had a couple of other ones since then. Tommy Ascaso is to blame for that text :D
Steven. wrote: At its peak
Steven.
Me and shoes too. Bastard.
AYN, Enrager, Libcom...
Innit brah
Well I thought I'd bump this
Well I thought I'd bump this cos I've been in a bit of an AYN nostalgia mood for some reason. There is now a bunch of shit in the library in our new Anarchist Youth Network archive.
There will also very shortly be a personal history/analysis of what it was, what happened and what went wrong.
I was maybe going to send out a bunch of mini-questionnaires to lots of the people involved to see what they thought about it in retrospect as well, to put online also.
guydebordisdead
guydebordisdead
Ah, I had wondered about that.
guydebordisdead wrote: Kids
guydebordisdead
Like those working class fools who won't fight The Man!
:D
jef costello
jef costello
That's probably true. While AYN was started by two class struggle anarchists in the AF - gawky being one - he buggered off immediately, while the other one plus the rest of had come from the activistoid milieu. So even those of us whose politics were actually ok had no idea of how to put them into practice. I'll put up my recollections tomorrow probably...
Good to read about the early
Good to read about the early days of the AYN. Brings back some memories from my early days.
And BTW, this isn't that very same spanner is it?
http://www.redanarchist.org/images/title.jpg
;)
B.
Admin - big pic turned to link
The same spanner as what?
The same spanner as what?
the one used to eat food with
the one used to eat food with Steven, i shouldn't wonder. Never heard of that group Beltov any links, its looks a laugh.
http://redanarchist.org/ US
http://redanarchist.org/
US based it seems. I think some of them post on Revleft. Not sure if any of them are on Libcom.
B.
i think they're out of
i think they're out of philadelphia?
I think Leo knows them from
I think Leo knows them from when he lived in the states.
Devrim
I think one of them posts on
I think one of them posts on LibCom
I like RAAN. I think of em
I like RAAN. I think of em like SHAC folks except with good politics. They could do a lot of good running direct actionist type campaigns against class enemies. Imagine a SHAC style campaign against union busting firms?
Who are SHAC?
Who are SHAC?
Stop Huntingdon Animal
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
Their like SHAC? Sounds
Their like SHAC? Sounds good, what do they do, run in and liberate workers?
guydebordisdead
guydebordisdead
This was always likely to happen. In fact I'm surprised that AY lasted as long as it did before most of the people around drifted off and a core moved into the WSM.
Youth organisations are difficult to sustain because the core people get older or get involved in different things. When that happens in a stand-alone youth organisation there are rarely enought new people committed to the organisation to take up the slack and the whole thing just sort of fades away.
Youth organisations connected to adult groupings can be a bit more stable because the adult organisation provides continuity and can also shoulder some of the organisational burden. Even then it's not easy: just look at the number of youth organisations on the left over the years and how few of them survive for any length of time:
The Connolly Youth Movement was resurrected a couple of years back and is now invisible again. The Republican Socialist Youth Movement also seems to be semi-defunct. The SWP have had a couple of goes at setting up Revolutionary Youth, to no avail. Anarchist Youth has just bitten the dust. Socialist Youth's run (it must be six years old by now) looks amazingly long by comparison.
It's a bit different in mainstream politics, where party youth wings provide a starting point for careerists and the like.
guydebordisdead
!
Catch 22 wrote: I like
Catch 22
geddouttahere!! Really? Gotta link?
on a general point, there is
on a general point, there is nothing wrong with youth groups in y view provided they are started by actual youth, preferably 14 - 18. If u r to accept a youth network is worth organising itself on its own - which i think i do - you can't have the initiative coming from people who aren't really youth. People up to 22 could be involved but it would confuse things. The best, and perhaps only good thing about a youth group is the ability for kids to work things out for themselves, amongst themselves. I think it helped the ex-AYN(UK) develop their political skills immeasurably.
If kids wanted to start a group, they should be supported by the feds, but there's no need to kick off a groip without any demand for it.
Irrationally Angry - on your list of deceased youth groups, bare in mind Revolution and ISR, the workers power and SP groups respectively. They are both going after dunno, a decade? Revolution has been very successful for WP and allowed them a presence in a lot of anti-capitalist events they wouldn't have otherwise been at. Revolution has apparently even survived the WP split. I'm not so sure how useful ISR have been to the SP but they seem to have a lot of genuinely young people in it on demo's and such.
guydebordisdead wrote: I
guydebordisdead
Part of it is that the adult party provides a kind of continuity, meaning that people can move on to other things without causing disruption to the organisation. It also can provide help in terms of resources, advice and encouragement when needed. It's much more difficult for a youth organisation out on its own to survive a difficult period or its founders moving on.
That said, plenty of organisations on the left have launched youth wings without managing to sustain them. That can be fairly easily explained in the cases of the CYM and RSYM: the adult parties, the CPI and the IRSP, don't have much life in them either. It's harder to explain why the SWP couldn't sustain Revolutionary Youth despite having launched it a couple of times. I suspect that they just didn't put enough time and effort into it, didn't allow it any independent life or perhaps they just didn't happen to have a few young people with the necessary drive.
As far as people having nice things to say goes, I'm more surprised if ex-members now drifting around other parts of the left do have nice things to say!
Anyone who joins Socialist Youth because of the career opportunities needs to have their head examined! I don't think that spending years as an activist in the hope of getting an opportunity to live in penury as a Socialist Party fulltimer in the future can really be considered a self-interested move. As for wanting to be a Socialist Party election candidate... well let's just say our candidate selection process more closely resembles conscription of the unwilling than it does the struggle for career advancement which takes place in the mainstream political parties.
If you become an SP candidate you have years of backbreaking labour to look forward to with little chance of ever getting elected to anything. I can only think of one person who ever angled for the chance to stand as an SP candidate, and he never became one.
Sign me up!
Sign me up!
Right I've posted my
Right I've posted my thoughts on this to the library now here
I was gonna make some changes maybe - so anything inaccurate or you disagree with, let me know and I may edit the article accordingly.
It sounds like a hideous
It sounds like a hideous waste of time and energy. The Israel related stunts seem particularly ill-judged and to be frank you are lucky that there weren't more serious consequences.
I have four questions though:
1) Are there any accounts from the other (non class-struggle) wing of the AYN of what they think went wrong? For that matter has anything been written by people who had your "activistoid" class struggle politics?
2) What were your decision making structures like? Was it all "consensus" and the like? And did people who didn't do anything have as much of a say as those who actually ended up doing the work?
3) What were your relationships like with other political groupings? You make reference to a certain younger sibling style relationship to the Wombles, but what about the AF, Solfed and Class War? What about Workers Power and Revolution and the rest of the 57 varieties?
4) This is related to the above question and is as much a point as a question, but what the hell were the AF thinking? Their members set the AYN up, they have a coherent politics of their own, why weren't they making a sustained effort to get in an around the AYN and win as many of its members to their politics as they could?
I mean say what you like about the WSM but they have come out of the Irish Anarchist Youth experience with most of its core half dozen activists as members of the adult group. The AYN was much bigger than AY and I can't see why the AF shouldn't have come out of the whole thing with say 20 consolidated new members. Other than obvious reasons of course - standard issue anarchist fear of recruitment and inability to intervene as a group. (For AF, feel free to insert Solfed for that matter).
John. wrote: Right I've
Steven.
A cracking read, thank you. One query is about the ativistoid scene recquiring and more militancy to 'fit in' or ganing approval - maybe its not the same people, but i've never experienced that, even on attempted 'riots'. Namechecking the RAF and ELF in that context seems... dunno.
ha ha ha, glad someone snapped that :D
now its all in the past mate, i also lined that AYN sticker on the tube and wrote 'Revo' over it, then lied when you cried about it on urban75 :p
ATB,T :)
tax wrote: One query is about
tax
I have definitely expierenced that, at the same time as Steven. Even if its not always explicit, its something which is definitely there.
IA
I dont think any of us have ever seen any.
There might be a couple of things floating around which came from the same approach as J.
Yes it mostly was "consensus" based, at first at least iirc.
Yes i think they did, again up until a point at least.
The AF, SF and CWF (like all other @ groups) were supportive I think, and out relationship with them was good. Socially at least. And I imagine all groups paid an interest to a certain extent because they saw the AYN as a good place to look for new people coming into the scene.
WP/Revo was a strange relationship. As a few AYNers had been involved with Revo and quite a few others dumped revol for AYN. They kinda seemed like the main 'competition' at one point. But the relationship was quite antagonistic at points, and the word 'sectarian' was used quite a lot by Revo etc.
I think as the article mentions, quite a few AYNers were reluctant to get involved in what they saw as an "older left", a reluctance which probably grew from encouragement from certain other people within the movement who also disliked AF etc.
Quote: Saturday 14th July
Bless! :D
rkn wrote: quite a few
rkn
:D
Great article Steven. I
Great article Steven.
I turned up to an AYN thing by accident (the second gathering thing), but I met some nice people there. Can't remember much about it though (to do with politics anyway).
IrrationallyAngry
IrrationallyAngry
Actually I think SolFed had no one in the age range that AYN were at the time, certainly in London (and likely at the time in Manchester).
That's not to say that we would have been any better than the AF at working with them, just that we were unlikely to encounter them.
For differences as well, I think you have to remember that London is much bigger than Dublin. There are hundreds of people calling themselves anarchists here that I've never met. It is very easy for people to get a critical mass for small group actions here - this can actually work against longer term perspectives as it means that groups don't learn how to work with people whose perspectives they disagree with.
Regards,
Martin
Tacks wrote: A cracking
Tacks
Not on them, but come on the whole culture was based around posing militancy. Who'd been to Prague, who'd been to Genoa, who'd been to Palestine, etc.
Yeah I figured that was you, I kept meaning to ask but forgot.
Nigel:
God yeah.
No.
I thought about emailing a tiny questionnaire of 4 questions to all the people who were involved, then I thought my time would be best spent on other stuff...
Er well Ed started writing something a while ago but got stalled. As it is I got the rest of the ex-AYN libcom people to have a look at it and suggest changes, then altered/added a few things.
Hmmm I think we used consensus informally, with occasional showings of hands. That said I'm not sure we ever made many decisions really, ha ha. I think we asked if anyone particularly disagreed with anything first, and if not then it was passed. I can't think of anything ever being vetoed by one person.
People who didn't do anything did have a say yes, but because we never made any useful decisions I can't see that that was ever a problem! I think some of us might have proposed something about defined membership, points of unity, membership fees at a gathering or two but it wouldn't have got through.
SF we never really met, they had no connection with the activistoid scene. AF we knew, since 2 of them started it, but one guy buggered off immediately. I think the general consensus was groups like the AF were a bit old and boring, like trot groups. Class War - one guy was in CW, attracted by the ultra-militant prop and crude "class" rhetoric. He left later. Another guy kinda liked CW for a bit and was thinking of joining I believe, he put up some of their stickers, but then realised it wasn't worth it. We saw some CW people a bit through their links to the wombles/the scene. One leading womble once said on an email list that we were the only other anarchist group they actually respected.
WP and revo we had rivalry with, because they were the biggest anti-cap youth group we encountered (we never saw more than 1 or 2 ISR (SP youth) people. I was in revo previously, and had got into internal arguments over their links to workers power and trotskyism. They even used unconstitutional methods against me at conference ;) - using old WP members not in revo to argue and vote against me. We also poached a bunch of their members and got into a few arguments with them on our email list which a couple of WPers joined. One amusing incident which comes to mind was when one AYNer made a jokey attack on a his imagined "pimply sixth-form leader" of Revo. One revo guy then posted "Hey that's not fair to make fun of my skin condition."
It wasn't an official AF thing. 2 young members did it. One with good politics left, I think he would've been pissing in the wind tbh, and the other was a class struggle activistoid like us.
A few ex-AYN people have joined the AF and SolFed (a bunch post here), not 20 though. I doubt they could've got 20 due to how apolitical so many were. I think the number would be comparable to the numbers workers power get out of revo, say, i.e. not many.
Irrationally Angry:
Irrationally Angry: "standard issue anarchist fear of recruitment"
I don't think the AF have ever had this trait, so please don't generalise about something you have no direct knowledge of. Other contributors have usefully explained why things were as not as pat as that with the AYN
As shoes said in general
As shoes said in general though, i dont think AYN was all bad. After all libcom wouldnt be here without the AYN and so therefore it might have been the best thing ever ;)
I think the fact we did it
I think the fact we did it all ourselves was good, a steep learning curve anyway. It certainly helped develop my organisational skills a lot. Hmm one thing i forgot to mention in there was the informal hierarchy thing, which necessitated some kind of transparent structure, recallability etc. Which I suppose we did have because we brought in rotating posts which worked, apart from some like web team, and posts did get rotated around the same 4-5 people. but then the hierarchy couldn't really be avoided because most of the people couldn't be bothered, although obviously that is a two-way street but it was pretty obvious what was up.
guydebordisdead wrote: But
guydebordisdead
I'm not really sure
they could've done much to "actively support" us really...
Steven. wrote: Not on them,
Steven.
Fuck anyone who hasn't been to palestine. Posers and cowards the lot.
whoever said: Quote: The
whoever said:
Or alternatively without the AYN (and a anticapitalist movement for Trots to leech off) kids will go straight to the AF. Not join neccessarily (though we could easily have a youth section - it would suck), but read the material on the site and contact us through that, myspace, or here to discuss stuff. It definitely doesn't have the same attraction as the AYN, but its got 'anarchist' in the name and upsets yer mum ;)
Steven. wrote: It wasn't an
Steven.
I'm pretty sure one of these people wasn't in the AF when the AYN was set up but was in fact involved with the wombles and SAG at the time.
rkn wrote: As shoes said in
rkn
Amen, Libcom is clearly life and better than most things:)
nastyned wrote: Steven.
nastyned
Yeah he told me that yesterday, I didn't realise. I will edit my article accordingly.
Steven. wrote: the informal
Steven.
an issue worthy of its own thread?
newyawka wrote: an issue
newyawka
only when someone cool enough suggests it ;)
ok, i'll see if i can get
ok, i'll see if i can get someone...send a few pm's...i'll get back...
newyawka wrote: ok, i'll
newyawka
a networker hey ... you'll climb far in this 'horizontal' organisation :P
guydebordisdead
guydebordisdead
Maybe I should've put something in there about it, but I'm not sure. Could do with a new discussion... but I think organisations having 2-tier memberships could be useful - one supporters, one full members, to give time for proper political education.
i think the informal
i think the informal hierarchy thing is important (and can be included in the thread Steven. just described) because it isn't easy building up a latitudinarian organization. people can learn by doing it, and perhaps often do, but it takes away energy if you have to break people in constantly to this mode.
Steven. wrote: ... we brought
Steven.
hhahahahaaaahya
It meant the website was
It meant the website was consistently the best thing about the organisation! :)
(after I stopped doing it)
Hmmm I dunno jimmer, the
Hmmm I dunno Tommy Ascaso, the site was pretty balls. Do you remember the 2 hippy girls in the banner? I think I still have that jpg somewhere...
the site never really had anything good on it, the only news it had up on it really were the accounts from palestine from E.
that said the forums were amazing, shat on this place. and did you ever go to the chat room? it was weird: rkn, jack, rosy and chloe talking all day using weird spellings and listening to royksopp.
Those hippy girls captured
Those hippy girls captured the mood of the time!
I wasn't saying the site was brilliant, but I think it was probably the best thing about the organisation, it got a lot of people involved and showed us the potential of websites for promoting political ideas and how forums could be used to discuss and organise. I can't honestly think of anything else the organisation did that I now think was worthwile, although had we not done it all we wouldn't be here now so I suppose it was worth it in the end.
I never used the chat room, 'cos I never left the forums, 1000 posts in a month, how fucking sad is that!
jimmer wrote: Those hippy
Tommy Ascaso
ha true.
The first gathering was pretty cool, as was the minor anti-social behaviour. But yeah that's true actually
yeah I suppose I didn't think about the forums beforehand, they were good. And shite though the site was it did get people involved - like catch for example, ha ha.
yeah true dat.
Shit I'd forgotten that, it was legendary! That was a month you were single wasn't it?...
John. wrote: And shite
Steven.
This is true. I don't think I really looked at anything which wasn't the forums though.
I put that 'real anarchist
I put that 'real anarchist youth' web page on my 'favourites' and now it's gone! :cry: :cry:
magnifico wrote: I put that
magnifico
ta-da!
http://libcom.org.uk/lib/official-anarchist-youth/
John. wrote: magnifico
Steven.
I'm just getting a blank page from that. Now i'm sadder than ever :cry:
yeah something weird just
yeah something weird just happened with hosting ???
http://www.geocities.com/chok
http://www.geocities.com/choked_victim/ayn.html
Yay!
Yay! :cool:
JonnyT
JonnyT
god i love that site <3 :grin: