Michael Schirru and the attempted assassination of Mussolini - Raffaele Schiavina

Michael Schirru
Michael Schirru

An account of the trial and death of American anarchist Michael Schirru, who travelled to Italy to attempt to assassinate the fascist dictator. Despite the fact that his "crimes" were not legally punishable by death, Schirru was executed by firing squad.

Submitted by Steven. on September 11, 2006

The American anarchist, Michael, or Michele, Schirru was arrested on February 3rd, 1931 in a hotel room in Rome and taken to the police sub-station of Trevi. Here he was about to be searched for arms when, with flashing rapidity, he reached for his gun, fired at each of the three officers in the room and then at himself, in the head. Two of the officers were but slightly wounded, while the third and Schirru himself were found to be in a very serious condition. Schirru had to undergo an operation to be saved from immediate death. He had gone to Rome to assassinate Mussolini.

Meanwhile, the police discovered that, in addition to the one in which he had been arrested, he was also renting another hotel room where two bombs loaded with powerful explosive were found and which, Schirru readily admitted, belonged to him. As soon as he was able to speak he declared that he had come to Rome purposely to kill Mussolini, and that the bombs were meant for this use. When his sudden arrest came to thwart his plan and deprive him of the liberty to execute it, he resolved to exact as great as possible a price for his life and liberty then ending his own life together with that of the police tools of Mussolini who were arresting him.

During his arrest, pending trial, he tried to communicate with his wife, who was living in New York with their two children, but failed. His wife on her side was trying to communicate with him, but to no avail. On March 27th, he wrote to his father, who was living in France:

"This is my eighth letter to you, and no answer has come. I have written several times to Minnie also, and as I have had no reply from her I believe my letters are not forwarded... All I have received is the text of a telegram form Minnie saying she and the children are well and that she is doing her utmost to assist me."

In fact, Mrs. Schirru was trying to interest the U.S. Department of State on her husband’s behalf. She was an American citizen by birth, while Schirru was one by naturalisation and had been travelling in Europe with an American passport. Mrs Schirru obviously thought that she was entitled to the protection of her Government. But the State Department had no interest whatever for Americans of Anarchist beliefs and didn’t care about Schirru’s treatment at the hands of the Fascist bandits. In fact the State Department of the United states was more interested in the information it received from the Fascist Embassy in Washington than to Mrs. Schirru’s plea that her husband be assured at least of a "fair trial."

What passed in those days between the State Department and His Fascist Majesty’s Ambassador in Washington is, of course, unknown to me, but I cannot help recalling that the same attitude of complacency which the Italian Government had assumed a few years before, when two Anarchists of Italian origin were slowly being done to death in Boston, was being repaid by the same attitude of complacency by the American Government, while Mussolini’s personal tribunal of assassins were preparing for Schirru’s murder.

The trial took place on May 28th, late in the afternoon. Cristini - a young fascist cut-throat raised to the highest ranks in the hierarchy as a reward for his bloody propensities - presided. No jury. No defence. No lawyers and no witnesses are admitted before Mussolini’s Special Tribunal - so called - unless approved by the Tribunal itself which is military in its formation and composed of the most trusted tools of the dictator.

Schirru conducted himself with great dignity during his trial - which, under the circumstances could hardly be called a trial. He repeated his former declaration of intention to kill Mussolini and gave his reasons. His lawyer - officially named by the Tribunal - gave a semblance of a defence, and in no time the Tribunal sentenced the "culprit" to be shot in the back.

Schirru received the sentence with fortitude and calmness: Not a word, not a movement.

At 2:30 o’clock, the next morning, he was awakened from his sleep and told that his execution would take place at sunrise. He asked permission to write his last words to his dear ones; declined the assistance of the priest and then was taken to the Braschi fortress, on the outskirts of Rome, where he was executed - only eight and a half hours after sentence had been passed - by a firing squad of twenty-four fascist militiamen.

Schirru’s execution was plain murder, even according to the fascist law. He had not killed anybody. He had simply had the intention to kill Mussolini, but he had never been at firing distance from Mussolini. Furthermore that intention was evidenced exclusively by his own declaration, and the shooting which followed his arrest at the Trevi police station did not carry the death penalty, as capital punishment existed in Italy at that time only for the murder of the king, the crown prince and Mussolini.

Thus Schirru was assassinated for his intentions as proved by his admission.

He faced death heroically. he well knew that, by asserting his intention of ridding Italy of its tyrant, he was throwing himself in the hands of the tyrant’s executioners. Nevertheless he did not hesitate. As he himself says in his Testament, which was published in Italian after his death, life had come to have for him only one purpose: the devotion of it to fighting for the liberation of the Italian people form the mediaeval tyranny that degraded it - and the instant he found himself a prisoner, unable to realise his long coveted design, he could no longer dedicate his deeds by his words and sacrifice.

By Melchior Seele1 , edited by libcom
MAN! Vol. 1, Nos 5-6 (May-June 1933)
From the Kate Sharpley Library

  • 1 This was a pseudonym used by Raffaele Schiavina in this publication.

Comments

sovversiva

8 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by sovversiva on February 9, 2016

Melchior Seele was probably one of the pseudonyms used by Raffaele Schiavina.

My first post!

Steven.

8 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on February 9, 2016

sovversiva

Melchior Seele was probably one of the pseudonyms used by Raffaele Schiavina.

My first post!

who's that?

As it says in the footnotes, Melchior Seele was a pseudonym of British anarcho syndicalist Albert Meltzer

Battlescarred

8 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Battlescarred on February 9, 2016

See here:
http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/ngf2s6
More likely the above artile is by Schiavina (Max Sartin) rather than Meltzer

Steven.

8 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on February 9, 2016

sovversiva I must apologise. Thanks for pointing this out, and thanks to battlescarred for the additional info. I didn't realise that Melchior Seele was a pseudonym used by someone else as well. Does anyone know why Albert chose to use this name?

Another thing which made me think it was Albert was that Albert wrote a fair few things about European resistance movements, and assassination attempts on fascist leaders…

I suppose I should have realised, as Meltzer would only have been 13 in 1933!

Anyway thanks again for pointing out the error.

Luca

8 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Luca on February 20, 2016

(from France) yes, Melchior Seele was here Schiavina. He usually used 'Max Sartin' as a pseudonym and was known as such as the editor of the Italo-American anarchist outstanding L'Adunata dei Refrattari but since he here decided to publish in "Man" he preferred to appear as an anglophone so to give a more universal meaning to his article, published with the translation (by himself) of Schirru's political testament.

kanewatson

3 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by kanewatson on August 23, 2020

If an Anarchist movement exists today among the Italian immigrants and if such a movement has suffered practically no desertions as a consequence of the Bolshevik incarnation of Socialism, it is due to a large extent to the teachings and example of Luigi Galleani.

yobert

3 years 6 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by yobert on September 6, 2020

published with the translation (by himself) of Schirru's political testament.
hcarewards