New York school crisis - Council for the Liberation of Daily Life

A situationist inspired intervention into education struggles in 1968. The text was orginally titled "The Newest School Buildings Are Indistinguishable from the Newest Prisons or the Newest Industrial Complexes".

Submitted by Fozzie on April 30, 2023

Beyond the family structure imposed on us, the school is generally the first instrument of social repression a child meets in life. To the school is assigned the task of breaking the will to individuation, of “channelling the mind”, of incapacitating the child with the rules that hold this society together: “This is the way things will be because this is the way they are”; the classroom serves to impress through the medium of daily routine that life is essentially following orders, that the choices are always among the given, that control of your life is, and always will be, somewhere else. Passivity is the rule, and all “activity” is planned (except for the frills: the extra-curricular; and then some). It is not accidental that the newest school buildings are indistinguishable from the newest prisons or the newest industrial complexes.

All the talk around the New York City “school crisis” misses this altogether. And this too is not accidental.

It is significant that the one voice that has not been heard in the great debate is that of the students. But after all, they cannot be expected to understand, because they are only children, partially educated beings: partially moulded to the system. And workers are dumb. And prisoners are unreformed criminals. Or so say the fictions that surround life. In the minds of the Mayor, of the Teachers’ Union, of the State Commissioner, of those who would use the issue of “community control” for their own ends—in the minds of all those who seek to maintain this education as an entrance into this system, there is the fear that if and when the student voice is heard it will say dangerous things. Dangerous, that is, to those people and the system they maintain.

Throughout much of the city, there has been the picture of locked schools with principals on the inside, police on the outside. There is a realization on the part of the Mayor, the Board of Education and the Union that there are far too many people whose “debt to education" might tempt them to convert open, empty schools into
most unusual playgrounds. And there is definitely no place in the curriculum for social creativity, that is, the spontaneous activity of free individuals.

In the interaction of the various protagonists and the students, some are likely to come forward who may sense the meaning of real decentralization, who would then be impelled to want to change the system of education, to throw out this one, establish another. But who, attempting really to throw out this one, will not have to pass through throwing out the city, the state, the federal structures? Danger to the way things are lurks everywhere.

The system—as it is so often called in reference to the overall prevailing organization of life—is caught in an irreversible decay. But a system that decays does not necessarily pass. All of its solutions are attempts to arrest decay, freeze relations, make the system permanent : “decentralizing” schools is one such solution, building suburbs is another. The fascination with the synthetic — from transistorized hearts to glass-bubble cities — is no accident. The synthetic is so much more easily manipulated, controlled, and always, for a better living, as we all know, through chemistry.

As long as the struggle is to maintain variations on what is, the solution to changing life is obscured, and obstructed.

“Well,” someone will inevitably say, “from your analysis, we might conclude that people should do nothing about what they see as wrong or feel oppressing them, until they are prepared to attack and change ‘the whole system’.”

This is not our meaning.

Those who feel it is meaningful (not those desiring to use an “issue”—the politicos, manipulators, those out to build constituencies), those who feel it is meaningful to fight over this or that must do so. What we say is the assault required to change one part is an assault from all sides, on the whole. People activate themselves, engage in protest, because of how it makes them feel. And we will all feel best when the control over all facets, all aspects of our lives resides in us alone.


Box 666, Stuyvesant Sta., N.Y., N.Y. 10009

Libcom note: The text above was edited for Anarchy (presumably for its mainly British audience, as New York specific references are removed). The original can be read at