It looks like you've tried to access a page that's only accessible to logged in users or admins.
miscellaneous
Access denied! (sorry about that)
If you have already registered you can login now or register (it takes seconds!) and find out what you're missing out on.
If you got this message for a page that you can normally see, something's probably gone wrong. If that happens, please post in the feedback forum or contact us via e-mail.
Comments
I am looking for: https://libcom.org/forums/thought/unity-identity-of-subject-and-object-in-marx
[email protected] wrote: I am looking for: https://libcom.org/forums/thought/unity-identity-of-subject-and-object-in-marx
Should be able to access this now
i am looking for
http://libcom.org/forums/theory/adorno-on-pop-music-29082008
amie.swiggs wrote: i am looking for
http://libcom.org/forums/theory/adorno-on-pop-music-29082008
That discussion appears to have been removed. An administrator may have an answer as to why?
westartfromhere wrote:
amie.swiggs wrote: i am looking for
http://libcom.org/forums/theory/adorno-on-pop-music-29082008That discussion appears to have been removed. An administrator may have an answer as to why?
At various points over the years we have unpublished old forum discussions, because of retrospective breaches of our comment guidelines.
Have now re-published that one.
I want to access: https://libcom.org/forums/news/michael-schmidt-author-black-flame-exposed-white-nationalist-infiltrator-26092015
Liberal-toe-sucker wrote: I want to access: https://libcom.org/forums/news/michael-schmidt-author-black-flame-exposed-white-nationalist-infiltrator-26092015
You should be able to access this now
Hello. I want to access: https://libcom.org/article/anarchism-south-africa-interview-michael-schmidt-zacf-2007
kiwimedia wrote: Hello. I want to access: https://libcom.org/article/anarchism-south-africa-interview-michael-schmidt-zacf-2007
That article has been taken off-line and we don't intend to put it back online, as it was conducted with a secret white supremacist (Schmidt), and has no factual value which would mitigate against that.
Steven. wrote:
kiwimedia wrote: Hello. I want to access: https://libcom.org/article/anarchism-south-africa-interview-michael-schmidt-zacf-2007That article has been taken off-line and we don't intend to put it back online, as it was conducted with a secret white supremacist (Schmidt), and has no factual value which would mitigate against that.
Obviously, this site should not promote racial supremacists from within the anarchist movement but would it be possible, somehow, to retain the Comments section attached to this interview? It seems counterproductive to censor the offending article whilst also censoring its detractors.
There was no discussion of this article in the comment section after it. There was one comment from a person complaining about Schmidt in general.
Steven wrote: There was one comment from a person complaining about Schmidt in general.
Well, at least there was one who saw through the trumped up nazi punk..
Is this one gone forever? "Critical comments on rose-tinted revisionist views of skinheads"
http://libcom.org/history/1960-today-skinhead-culture
Steven. wrote: That article was nonsense and so it was removed, yes
Fozzie wrote: Which is a pity because I think a critique of the romanticised history of skinhead culture would be cool.
I did eventually read that (very short) article - and agreed that it was nonsense!
Fozzie wrote: I did eventually read that (very short) article - and agreed that it was nonsense!
You are in a privileged position: being able to read nonsense.
Followed a link on the site to this but it's been fed to the penguin
http://libcom.org/forums/anti-fascism/putting-the-record-straight
Any chance of this "bourgeois motherfucker" seeing it?
Admin: comment lightly edited as we have re-published the discussion.
In the absence of the above link, our thoughts on anti-fascism are that all states are fascist, in that they bind disparate elements of the capital, including the labour force, within the nation, or conglomerate of nations.
The term anti-fascist is a mystification. The working class is inherently against the mercantile state and its political administration. Fascism or anti-fascism are terms that only aim to disunify the class of labour.
lurdan wrote: Followed a link on the site to this but it's been fed to the penguin
http://libcom.org/forums/anti-fascism/putting-the-record-straight
Any chance of this "bourgeois motherfucker" seeing it?
Admin: comment lightly edited as we have re-published the discussion.
While some of the comments in this discussion are rude, and breach our current posting guidelines, this discussion contains important information from a person debunking misinformation about themselves, so we have re-published it.
I got to this page (https://libcom.org/discussion/request-content-posting-rights-here) from Content Guidelines to ask for permission to submit content but a red pengu yelling at me Access Denied!
I've already tried different browsers and also made sure I'm logged in to my account.
Hi Sharam - what happens if you press the "submit content" button at the top of the page?
Fozzie wrote: Hi Sharam - what happens if you press the "submit content" button at the top of the page?
Hi Fozzie: do you mean a 'submit content' on this current page? I don't see one.
Fozzie wrote: Hi Sharam - what happens if you press the "submit content" button at the top of the page?
If you mean the 'submit content' on my account, it goes to next page showing 3 options , I choose Article, but only have Save as: Draft option with Save & Preview buttons.
Basically, I don't have the permission to Publish it. It's been 3 weeks and haven't received any responses to my emails or comments except you.
Trying to follow the Content Guidelines will redirect to the page with red penguin saying No Access.
Ah OK - I am able to publish your drafts, so perhaps that is a good way forward for now? I just did that for the Loren Goldner piece you submitted. I hope that is OK.
Fozzie wrote: Ah OK - I am able to publish your drafts, so perhaps that is a good way forward for now? I just did that for the Loren Goldner piece you submitted. I hope that is OK.
This is great! Thank you Fozzie.
I'll be uploading another one soon. I don't mind giving you the trouble to do the same (hope you are OK with this), but is there a fix for this so I don't bog you down with these comments?
Thanks Shahram - yes that is all fine. I believe that someone with more admin powers than I would need to change your permissions. I am sure one of them will be along in due course, but please proceed in the meantime...
Fozzie deserves a promotion I think; look at all the content he's uploaded! A real Stakhanov that all libcom contributors should try to emulate. Give Fozzie more admin privileges right now!!
Fozzie wrote: Thanks Shahram - yes that is all fine. I believe that someone with more admin powers than I would need to change your permissions. I am sure one of them will be along in due course, but please proceed in the meantime...
Alright, glad to have a plan for now! Thanks!
adri wrote: Fozzie deserves a promotion I think; look at all the content he's uploaded! A real Stakhanov that all libcom contributors should try to emulate. Give Fozzie more admin privileges right now!!
Yes, I second that (though I don't have any voting power)!
Comrade Fozzie has been working at the Library of Communism for over 21 years; he damn well deserves to edit people's posting permissions!
(I also hope he didn't take offense to me comparing him to Stakhanov—the whole Stalinist labor-competition thing was indeed terrible.)
Thanks for the nice comments both. Posting content is its own reward :-)
Whoops, something broke
libcom.org has been running for several years on a lot of different software, so it's likely the page you want exists, but doesn't live here any more. If you're really trying hard to find a page and it isn't here, contact us.
If you've been brought to this page from a link on another website, please ask them to update their links.
Comments