Design a new logo for libcom

Farewell, old logo
Farewell, old logo

We're nearly ready to roll out the long-awaited site redesign. The finishing touch is a new site logo graphic.

Submitted by libcom on March 27, 2012

We have some ideas, but we know some of our thousands of users are talented graphic designers. Therefore we thought we'd throw this open to libcom user submissions, and we'll then pick our favourite as the new site logo/header. Libcom doesn't make any profit, has no commercial adverts and is entirely funded out of the admins subs and user donations.

Specs

The specifications are: on the site it should be no more than 221 x 51 pixels, preferably including red and black colours and a star or variant - but perhaps that's just our lack of imagination so this isn't a hard-and fast requirement. Submissions preferably in high-res png or svg format. Easiest thing to do is to upload somewhere (e.g. imgur.com) and link below.

The deadline for this is Sunday April 22, and we aim to pick a new logo and launch the redesign on May 1 if all goes to plan.

New theme in public testing

To help designing a new logo, or for plain curiosity, the new theme is also now available for public testing. Registered users can switch it on by going to my account > edit and selecting 'nosotros' under 'theme configuration'.

There are some known bugs, but please use this thread in the feedback forum to let us know any problems, suggestions etc, and we'll fix as many as we can before the launch.

Comments

Steven.

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on March 27, 2012

Thanks, glad you like it. There are quite a lot of issues with it (see the thread linked to above) but we still think it is a massive improvement on the existing theme.

Just to say that one user has knocked up a new logo already:

Anatta

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Anatta on March 27, 2012

That logo looks ace

snipfool

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by snipfool on March 27, 2012

i really like that. just riffing on that, i wondered what it'd look like with the star as the dot.

i'm not convinced, but putting it out there.

Chilli Sauce

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Chilli Sauce on March 27, 2012

Sorry Snipfool, but I like the first one comrade (although I had the exact same idea).

So who designed that first one you posted up Steven? My money's on Harrison....

working class …

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by working class … on March 27, 2012

I am going to be boring and say really like the existing one.

Iskra

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Iskra on March 28, 2012

I like current design... it's simple. I hope you don't wanna make something to modern with to many blinking stuff.

Ethos

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Ethos on March 28, 2012

Just in case you guys are going with the logo shown above, why not make the "lib" black and the "com" red? The "org" can be yellow for our anarcho-capitalist comrades...totally serious about that last part...totally...
:upnorth: <---Serious face.

jolasmo

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jolasmo on March 28, 2012

The red and black star seems intrusive in both logos, why not ejust have the red and black libcom.org without the star?

~J.

Rob Ray

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Rob Ray on March 28, 2012

jef costello

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jef costello on March 28, 2012

I think the first one is good but the letters should alternately flash black and red and that the star should spin around.

snipfool

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by snipfool on March 28, 2012

I think it's about time we expanded the site's name to make it more obvious what it means.

working class …

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by working class … on March 28, 2012

like this

build_and_withdraw

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by build_and_withdraw on March 28, 2012

the new theme is a big improvement in terms of navigation, but still feels a bit wonky and blog default-y. but then again, i don't know if a really 'tight' design would actually turn off some people because of looking too 'corporate.'
also, as someone who (tries) to make a living from graphic design. i would make it clear in your contest that libcom.org does not make any money from the site (which I'm assuming is the case), so that the logo contest isn't perceived as another instance of free labour in exchange for prestige/experience/a good opportunity/CV/etc., that graphic designers and other creative workers are subjected to all the time.

Steven.

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on March 28, 2012

That is correct, we don't make profit from the site, we are all volunteers ourselves, we can edit that in.

build_and_withdraw

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by build_and_withdraw on March 28, 2012

cool! sorry, didn't mean to wag my finger there, just thought it would be good to include. that said, here is a suggestion.

flaneur

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by flaneur on March 28, 2012

That last one is sharp.

Armchair Anarchist

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Armchair Anarchist on March 28, 2012

Like the first logo*, also the new theme is good but the CSS needs a fair bit of tweaking. Would it be helpful to list the glitches, or is this something you're aware of and working on...?

*edit - agree with jolesmo's point about the star though

Steven.

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on March 28, 2012

build_and_withdraw

cool! sorry, didn't mean to wag my finger there, just thought it would be good to include. that said, here is a suggestion.

I can't see that image, can other people?

Armchair Anarchist

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Armchair Anarchist on March 28, 2012

Half of them seem to have disappeared

Steven.

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on March 28, 2012

Hey armchair, there is a separate thread in the feedback forum for people to raise issues/comments with the theme, so mentioning them there would be really helpful

Nwbtcw

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Nwbtcw on March 28, 2012

Libcom Logo

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

conservative

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

menswear

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

sane

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

sharp

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

slash

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

square

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

friendly youth

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

Properly reducing a putanesca pasta sauce takes forever ;)

working class …

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by working class … on March 29, 2012

I like this

tastybrain

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by tastybrain on March 29, 2012

I don't like the "dot org" thing. It should just be ".org"

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

tastybrain

I don't like the "dot org" thing. It should just be ".org"

The menswear one is for you then ;)

Some of them would probably work better with .org as you say, but not all. These were put together very quickly, almost burning my food in the process.

Rob Ray

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Rob Ray on March 29, 2012

Friendly youth one looks quite solidarnosc with that line underneath

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on March 29, 2012

Forgot I meant to do an activisty one. Sorta handwritten, sharp, but agressive was the plan.
They all have svg sources upon request.

Chilli Sauce

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Chilli Sauce on March 30, 2012

This is going to be like the SolFed national logo vote all over again...

RedEd

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by RedEd on April 1, 2012

Maybe I just love simplicity too much but the current logo seems better than any of the proposed alternatives. Probably some slogan like 'Communism not complication' could justify this, but who cares?

redsdisease

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by redsdisease on April 1, 2012

I like the one that sabot did:

Evie

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Evie on April 1, 2012

My effort. That said, imo the first suggestion is the best so far.

Really liking the redesign as a whole!

petey

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by petey on April 1, 2012

i vote for cooked's 'conservative' and 'sane'. very srs looking.

flaneur

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by flaneur on April 1, 2012

Cooked

sharp

Dallas Stars vibe that one 8-)

Cooked

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on April 1, 2012

petey

i vote for cooked's 'conservative' and 'sane'. very srs looking.

So I have to offer some less srs ones for the activists out there.

marker 1 to 4

Testing how they work in black, white etc. I've done that with a few of the others aswell.

I'm aimlessly churning these out only thinking about the visual aspects, ingnoring what "image" I think is appropriate for the site.

Harrison

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Harrison on April 1, 2012

Steven.

Thanks, glad you like it. There are quite a lot of issues with it (see the thread linked to above) but we still think it is a massive improvement on the existing theme.

Just to say that one user has knocked up a new logo already:

can we just use this one? it fits much more with the theme...

communal_pie

12 years 8 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by communal_pie on April 2, 2012

Cooked

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on April 3, 2012

slab 1 and 2

Arbeiten

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Arbeiten on April 3, 2012

I like slab 1 Cooked, but what about aligning the G with the M? I'm sorry if that is a terrible idea and I have revealed myself as a design cretin....

Cooked

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Cooked on April 3, 2012

Arbeiten

I like slab 1 Cooked, but what about aligning the G with the M?

Give it a shot! Cut it up in photohop, gimp, mspaint and see how it goes. I'd upload the "original" for you to tweak but I don't have access to the files atm.

They are all done in inkscape which is easy to use. Have been weening myself of Adobe for a while.

In my view moving the org would result in an unbalanced and fragmented composition. But you can't know for sure before testing.

communal_pie

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by communal_pie on April 5, 2012

lukitas

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by lukitas on April 7, 2012

I humbly submit these :

The first one is nice, but the star gets lost at smaller sizes.
I tried to find a font that is easy to read and isn't 'classy' : this one was used on handbills for the masses.

lukitas

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by lukitas on April 7, 2012

Dissapointed at the size these things who up. maybe I should have limited myself to one.

Chomp

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Chomp on April 10, 2012

Chomp

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Chomp on April 10, 2012

Some quick ideas

Harrison

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Harrison on April 11, 2012

fuck yeah

Harrison

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Harrison on April 11, 2012

I've tried to go for a (hopefully!) friendly reassuring feel on this one, aimed at appeasing past critics of the site. Thoughts?

Steven.

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on April 28, 2012

I like those Django, I think those are the best so far.

Here's my suggestion, incorporating a redesigned site header (click for full-size):

There are a few different variations of this here:
http://imgur.com/a/hLHxa

Rob Ray

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Rob Ray on April 28, 2012

Bit similar to an estate agent one though...

Juan Conatz

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Juan Conatz on April 28, 2012

Steven, that looks like the Walmart logo

petey

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by petey on April 28, 2012

Steven.

Here's my suggestion, incorporating a redesigned site header (click for full-size):

that looks like an asterisk, not a star

dohball

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by dohball on April 29, 2012

i looked at them all & i like the first one best,

also quite like lukitas's one but i think it although it looks good it reads too much like libCOM.org cos of the vibrancy of the red

Joseph Kay

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Joseph Kay on May 1, 2012

just a note on this - we realised we can't really change the logo without rejigging the header region to keep it looking balanced. so we're discussing what to do and may well re-do the site header (including logo) in the future.

bulmer

12 years 7 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by bulmer on May 2, 2012

I think the header is definitely a weak point on the site, so it needs something changing on it.