Owen Jones’s dangerous illusion

A response to ‘A cruel society is being built. Voting Labour begins the fightback’ by Owen Jones.

Submitted by Phil on April 27, 2015

On 21 April, to absolutely nobody’s amazement, Owen Jones advocated a vote for Labour in his Guardian column.

Jones will tell anyone who asks that he’s a fierce critic of the party when it does wrong, and sure enough it’s easy to find articles where he decries this or that Labour policy pronouncement. But it hardly seems to matter; Labour can be as reactionary as they like and Jones can write as many denouncements as he wants, but in the end the party can rely on not only his vote but his recommendation to others.

As far as criticism goes, that’s the safest possible form any would-be government can hope for. Empty threats honestly have more substance, because even if you pull your punch at least you don’t prostrate yourself before the other guy.

I’ve dealt with the notion of holding your nose to vote Labour before. Jones’s article is just the latest version of a piece written so many times before that you wonder if newspapers have a template on hand for any columnist to bash out at election time. Emotional blackmail plus implied guilt with a dash of threat equals a vote for Labour.

So rather than his electoral hackery, I’d like to tackle here Jones’s interpretation of how campaigning works and what its purpose is.

Owen Jones

Indeed, those who claim there is no difference between Labour and the Tories do down every single person who has protested and campaigned over the last few years. UK Uncut occupied shops and businesses that refuse to pay tax as our services and welfare state are shredded. Many of those activists, my friends among them, were arrested. Their sacrifice was not in vain: they forced the issue on to the agenda, and have everything to do with Labour’s promised clampdown on tax avoidance and non-dom status.

Trade unionists and other activists sick of British workers being commodities to be hired and fired won a commitment from Labour to clamp down on zero-hours contracts. Dogged NHS campaigners won a Labour pledge to reverse privatisation, and even a partial renunciation of New Labour’s obsession with the private sector. The persistence of anti-war protestors over so many years culminated in Ed Miliband’s vetoing of the proposed bombing of Syria, a dramatic rupture with the bomb-happy leadership of Tony Blair. Who knows? Islamic State could be in Damascus right now if things had panned out differently.

The most obvious problem with the above is that it effectively reduces all organising and campaigning down to shifting Labour’s position on any number of issues. At the conclusion of the article, Jones goes further by suggesting that all of our “campaigns and struggles […] would, under Toryism, be doomed.”

This sentiment promotes a dangerous illusion – that the strength of the working class and so its ability to effect social change is tied to the electoral fortunes of Labour. As such, without a Labour government, there’s no point fighting as we can’t win until they get back in. Hence, with a Labour government, our criticism must be tempered by the need to keep them in power.

Needless to say, this is disingenuous bollocks.

Even if I bought the logic of pulling Labour leftward (spoiler: I don’t), what leverage is there to do that if no matter what they do they always have your vote for fear of the Tories?

More importantly, the focus on whether or not Labour will do something only obscures the fact that we win concessions and improvements through our ability to threaten disruption. Our organised strength as a class is the deciding factor of how effective struggles are, not which party is currently in charge.

The victories of organised campaigns should not be measured in Labour’s election pledges, since there is no more reason to believe Ed Miliband’s 2015 pledge to end zero hour contracts than Tony Blair’s 1995 pledge to do the same. Such pledges are no doubt the party trying to make political capital out of popular opinion, but Labour are hardly the only ones to do that. Taking the UK Uncut example, we should remember that the Tories have promised action on tax avoidance too.

As another example, zero hours contracts will be beaten when the BFAWU union’s strike victory on the issue is widely emulated and the bosses are forced into a retreat, leaving the state no option but to legislate against them in order to ward off further action. This isn’t dependent on any particular party being in charge but on the strength of our class.

It’s also worth noting that a letter to the Guardian has already debunked Jones’s image of an anti-war Miliband as a crock too.

Gabriel Carlyle

In reality, “virtually all” of Labour’s list of requirements for supporting military action in 2013 “appear[ed] in the government’s own motion” (Malcolm Rifkind), and Miliband himself explained that he was prepared to back military action without a UN resolution. As Jonathan Steele observed, “Cameron and Miliband used dubious legal grounds to try to justify bypassing a veto in the UN security council by saying western military strikes were needed to protect Syrians” (Opinion, 1 September 2013).

Miliband supports our current bombing of Iraq, and backed both Nato’s 2011 bombing of Libya and Britain’s most recent war in Afghanistan. Hold your nose and vote Labour on 7 May if you will, but have no illusions: Miliband is a man of war and imperial power, just like his predecessor.

Finally, Jones’s counter-posing of “Labour” and “the establishment” as if one is not part of the other underlines what he is doing. This isn’t just a nauseatingly earnest plea that we vote for the lesser of two evils, it is a plea which justifies itself by obfuscating where the power of the working class truly lies.

That is why it isn't just patronising and wrong-headed, but actively dangerous.



9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Croy on April 28, 2015

spot on


9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by rat on April 30, 2015

Nice one.

Owen Jones’s article reminds me of a set of awkward contortions accompanying this embarrassing display of Leftist gymnastics in the article by Laurie Penny in the New Statesman a couple of weeks ago.

"There may be nothing to vote for — but there's plenty to vote against."

Not voting isn't passive, but it only works if politicians care what you think. To be counted, you have to step into the ballot box - if only to register your disgust.

Right now, there may not be much to vote for but there’s plenty to vote against. Go out and vote, if you can stand it, and I hope you can. Vote in disgust. Vote in despair.



9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Nitlus on May 1, 2015

The dangerous illusion is that trickle down economics works and that wealth creation for a tiny elite benefits all.

Owen jones rightly shines a light on the immoral corporate/establishment hegemony which serves wealth creation for the few. Meanwhile right wing politicians and the media perpetuate a blame culture which demonises benefits claimants and immigrants, deflecting the focus from the responsibilities the super rich elite who evade tax and do all they can to lock in wealth and power in order to maintain an iniquitous status quo.

Bravo Owen - a much needed voice of reason and an inspiration.

P.S. Is Owen not supposed to drink champagne?


9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Spikymike on May 1, 2015

As far as I can see Owen Jones and the rest of the UK Guardian liberal/lefties only inspires the gullible to support the Labour Party's government of UK capitalism plc, including the continuation of exploitation, oppression, massive social inequality, ecological destruction , war and everything else that goes with it, and a few obvious swipes at Tory arrogance and the right wing doesn't change that.


8 years 5 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Spikymike on January 7, 2016

And.....I see Owen Jones the unofficial Labour Party adviser on it's left has just done a flip-flop with his tactical advice on how he thinks the Labour Party should campaign around the European referendum from an 'independent' OUT to an 'independent' IN. See here: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/07/labour-tory-chaos-david-cameron-divided-europe
Reminded me of a recent conversation with my trotskyist friend who's group had decided on a campaign to stay IN but said he might argue to change that depending on whether Jeremy opted for an 'anti-austerity' OUT campaign or not. Seems it's all down to Jeremy for these aspiring lefty leaders who otherwise have an overblown opinion of their own importance. They certainly manage to tie themselves in knots in the process of trying to make a final decision on this issue.

the button

8 years 5 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by the button on January 7, 2016


6 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by evonneholm on May 27, 2018

Awesome blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine.

Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks

Feel free to visit my blog: ios 手錶


6 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by ynrrosalie on May 27, 2018

This is a topic which is near to my heart... Thank you! Exactly where are your contact details though?

Also visit my homepage ... [url=http://www.cat4mba.com/node/add/blog?%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22title%22%0D%0A%0D%0ALG%E5%B0%87%E6%8E%A8%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E6%89%8B%E8%A1%A8%EF%BC%9A%E7%9F%B3%E8%8B%B1%E6%A9%9F%E8%8A%AF%E3%80%81%E8%B0%B7%E6%AD%8CWear%20OS%E5%8A%A0%E6%8C%81%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22taxonomy[1]%22%0D%0A%0D%0A464%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;
%20name=%22teaser_include%22%0D%0A%0D%0A1%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22body%22%0D%0A%0D%0A%3Cimg%20src=%22http://0.image.kw.okbuycdn.com/images/multipic/4/20160922/dd835e081a4a69f478938ed9d124e25a.jpg%22%20style=%22max-width:400px;float:left;padding:10px%2010px%2010px%200px;border:0px;%22%3E%3Cimg%20src=%22http://cdn.upf.123.com.cn/caij/FileUpload/20180428/89aE-fztkpip5951004.jpg%22%20width='350'%20/%3E%0D%0A%3Cp%3E%E6%97%A5%E5%89%8D%EF%BC%8C%E8%B0%B7%E6%AD%8C%E5%B7%B2%E7%B6%93%3Ca%20href=%22/search%3Fsafe=strict%20name=%22changed%22%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22form_build_id%22%0D%0A%0D%0Aform-97c23534b17a24595aaa6c52304ec0a5%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22form_id%22%0D%0A%0D%0Aforum_node_form%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22mollom[session_id]%22%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22mollom[homepage]%22%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttp://www.newsinner.com/%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22op%22%0D%0A%0D%0ASave%0D%0A%boundary%%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name=%22taxonomy%22%0D%0A%0D%0A1%0D%0A%boundary%--]garmin gps 手錶,bradley 手錶,is愛思 手錶,wenger
手錶,手錶 網購,winner 手錶,英國 手錶,dw 手錶 專櫃,mini 手錶,手錶 設計,手錶
悠遊卡,g 手錶,華碩 手錶,愛迪達
手錶,天說 手錶,sekia 手錶,aigner 手錶,ball 手錶,
女生 手錶,ben 10 手錶[/url]


6 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by laylaabend on May 27, 2018

Howdy! This blog post couldn't be written much better! Reading through this article
reminds me of my previous roommate! He constantly kept preaching about this.
I'll forward this post to him. Fairly certain he's going to have a great read.
Thanks for sharing!

My webpage: womantalk.co.Kr