This is a statement from Revolutionary Anarchist Action / Devrimci Anarşist Faaliyet (DAF) on today’s bombing attack on the pro-Kurdish peace rally in Ankara, Turkey, which has so far killed more than 80 activists:
This is a statement from Revolutionary Anarchist Action on today’s bombing attack on the pro-Kurdish peace rally in Ankara, Turkey, which has so far killed more than 80 activists:
CAN’T BE FORGOTTEN, CAN’T BE FORGIVEN
Today, on the 10th of October, the “Labor, Democracy and Peace Meeting” that was organized by various unions, associations and organizations has been attacked. Like in Amed on June and in Suruc on July, the bombs exploding in Ankara today has killed tens of people.
Thousands of people came together from many different cities of the geography against the politics of war, against war profiteering of different power groups. Today, the bombs that exploded, murdered the people who wanted peace, life and freedom against war.
This explosion, in which more than 30 people have lost their lives until now, is a reflection of the blood thirsty greed of the powers. The ones who murdered in Amed, in Pirsus, in Cizir, are now trying to intimidate the peoples, frustrate with war politics and discourage from the struggle for freedom, by murdering tens of people in Ankara.
The powers should know that by any means, be it arrests or murder with bombs, we will not be afraid of the powers or submit their war politics.
For a new world, a life of freedom, the murderers in Amed, in Pirsus, Cizir and Ankara, murdered ones
CAN’T BE FORGOTTEN, the murderers CAN’T BE FORGIVEN.
Revolutionary Anarchist Action / Devrimci Anarşist Faaliyet (DAF)
Comments
Thanks for putting this up!
Thanks for putting this up! In future tho, do you reckon you could put up an image with the articles? Makes it easier to share that way..
Also, Turkish govt clearly taking the piss:
Turkey bomb blasts: Islamic State and 'far-left militants' emerge as suspects
The young woman is already
[Warning: graphic image] link
Chris Stephenson
Chris Stephenson
https://www.facebook.com/chris.stephenson.1466/posts/10153720908766518
In the early September,
In the early September, crazed lunatic Erdogan was flying to the Belgian capital to meet the EU, Presidents of the European Commission, European Council and European Parliament (his political class/family members).
He wanted, among other things;
- The EU to provide military support to establish a "safe zone" in Syria, near the border with Turkey: There, large refugee camps be established.
- The Turkish people to be able to travel without visas in Europe.
The part of agenda for meeting was to reduce the flow of migrants, (which is in reality engineered) by the Turkish sate/AKP.
We do not know how much Erdogan has exactly strengthened his hand in negotiations with the EU and the US for his geopolitical plan for Syria in the context of confronting Russian-Assad network of destructive imperialist war in the region. We shall see soon, how much the EU and the NATO can deliver as open support for the AKP’s fascistic( democratic Islamism) dominance in Turkey.
In the context of the EU, US and Turkey ( US-NATO network) geopolitical re engineering of the Middle East, the mass media, ‘the fourth estate’, reflects what is interesting for the interest of ruling classes. Thus, bombing (suicide bomb) of proletarian masses(Turks, Kurds ...) in Ankara is news for the mass media that can be manipulated in any way.
Sunni fundamentalism is the
Sunni fundamentalism is the elephant in the room. The AKP and IS are on the same general page when it comes to killing leftists, smashing attempts at Kurdish independence and establishing a Sunni fundamentalist oriented State.
I think the Turkish State turned a blind eye to IS suicide bombers in Ankara.
Another couple of statements
Another couple of statements by Turkish anarchist groups, just translated:
from Kara Kizil Istanbul
and from Taçanka, Ankara
Any report backs on the
Any report backs on the general strike?
I was mostly attending the
I was mostly attending the funeral stuff and away from job (and my city) so practically "in strike". However I was not be able to observe a lot about it. However friends say it was strong relative to the weakness of labor movement in general. I do not think it could amount to a real "general strike" but this was the most realised strike of many unions as their members truly did not went to work (which does not happen always with this much of success) Also a note: my observations mostly depend on the university I work in and about general services in Ankara city.
Thanks Kurrem. If you come
Thanks Kurrem. If you come across any report-backs in English, let us know. Solidarity!
No problem. Also I copied
No problem.
Also I copied this news to forums:
http://libcom.org/forums/middle-east/ali-kitapci-turkish-anarcho-syndicalist-killed-ankara-masaccre-14102015
Quote: Any report backs on
I am in Istanbul. There were practically no strike actions. Only a couple of small workshops that were already in some of form strike action recently showed solidarity. Beyond that nothing visible. In some cases police even attacked the funerals. Demos disbanded. In an international football game in konya (extremely conservative islamist town in central turkey which is practically a shit hole) crowds even booed during one minute long minute of silence to show respect for the fallen in Ankara. Total apathy.
So practically mourning is not possible in Turkey. Only anger and organization for the total abolution of this f.cking murderous state are.
Fucking hell, that sounds
Fucking hell, that sounds terrible Mikail, but thanks for the report back anyway.
If you get a minute, btw, I'd love for you or someone else to describe how strikes work in Turkey. I was living there during Gezi and unions seemed to call "general strikes" at a pretty short notice. Is there a balloting process? Are political strikes legal? Outside of big strike calls, how do unions typically organize strikes?
Chilli; Political strikes,
Chilli;
Political strikes, solidarity strikes, occupations, general strikes etc are all illegal according to the Turkish constitution. Workers are only allowed to strike in the process of collective bargaining and only if there emerges a conflict between unions and bosses. These collective bargainings take place between union federations and state & bosses on three yearly cycles. Even then strikes can only happen through a very complicated legal process and mostly top down. But make no mistake. Strikes are almost totally illegal but the union confederations are cherished and carefully protected under the state law. In fact after the last referendum in 2010 three main union confederations (Turk-IS (statist, centre), HAK-IS (islamist), DISK (leftist)) are granted constitutional status and carefully calculated legal adjustments are made so that their declining membership would not bar their legal standing as the official reps of workers.
However, of course class struggle in Turkey (as everywhere else) does not follow the constraints of legal barriers. Practically there are three types of strike actions, which are in conflict with each other, serving different class interests.
1 - Wildcat strikes. In the fashion Luxemburg described in mass strikes, wildcat strikes mostly emerge as the surfacing of a subterranean struggle that is always underway between the bosses and the workers in workplaces. In almost all wildcat strikes you see workers organizing themselves on the shop floor ingeniously calculating all the odds, and only in a couple of days pushing the bosses into a corner and wresting major gains. So most wildcat strikes -even though they are legally banned- win major victories with rarely (if ever) little losses. Recently not only their numbers rose but also their goals tended to be more sharply formulated. In metal sector in Bursa and Marmara region there were strike after strike and every factory took over the same list of demands which included the expulsion of the unions from the factory.
2- "Leftist" strikes. What I mean by a leftist strike is typically a strike caused by the miserable failure of leftists' attempt at unionizing workplaces. In those cases, a bunch of leftists -mostly radical- enter a non-union factory, they organize some workers to join a legal union, and when they are uncovered the bosses sack them. Than they usually open a lawsuit for being illegally sacked while at the same time building a tent in front of the factory until the legal case is over. Usually the sacked unionized workers wait there day and night. These kind of "struggles" not only demoralize other workers and exhaust those in the "tent occupation" but also feed into a false belief in legalism and courts as the last resorts in struggle. They are actually not even strikes because they mainly break solidarity ties between the militant sacked workers and those who continue to work inside the shop. That way an image of struggle as a heroic act of martyrdom is sustained and the cause of collective class solidarity in action is undermined.
3- Unions' (not so) "general strikes". As it happened after the Ankara bombing, unions sometimes call fake general strikes. After the Gezi revolt and the Ankara bombing there were small strikes. However, only radical left "participate" in them and they are practically A to B marches, totally depressing and under constant police harassment. We can say basically the function of Turkish unions is not organize strikes but to suppress them and if possible limit political actions to leftist demos in central squares where the leftist Kurdish and Turkish youth is beaten by the police. So basically unions are total state functionaries channeling the combative spirit in a safe way to the hands of police...
I hope this could clarify some of your questions... Shoot any further questions if you have any.
Thanks Mikhail. And thanks
Thanks Mikhail. And thanks Kurrem, too.
My only follow-up question would be if there's typically repercussions for the workers who participate in the "general strikes"?. And I guess the state doesn't come after the unions who call these strikes despite their ostensible illegal status? Not even any saber-rattling?
No to all three. These are
No to all three. These are not real strikes. These genera strikes are merely demonstrations only a couple of thousand people, mostly students and leftists participate. So unions (and it is mostly DIsk that calls for such "general strikes") never organize these strikes inside the shop floor.
So people just don't stay off
So people just don't stay off from work when these general strikes are called?
I mean, I'm not trying to defend the unions here and I get that most union "actions" are pretty much symbolic in every country I've lived in, but surely some people must stay out of work when these strikes are called?
I don't know, I think I'm asking because I recall hearing that when the first Gezi "General Strike" was called like half-a-million people came out or something? Perhaps that's just the unions claiming demo figures were strike figures, but that takes some serious balls to misrepresent yourself like that...
This is the truth Chilli
This is the truth Chilli Sauce. Ask anyone. I doubt if DISK or KESK (leftist unions) actually informed their members about this so called "general strike".
Well not to stat an argument
Well not to stat an argument and I hate my union (KESK) but they informed their members. They made two demonstrations one in the workplace and one in the city center and this is actually usual. However most of the members(which is very tiny part of all workforce) are afraid of even participating in press releases let alone the strike. So though the strike was better participated than most other strikes in the past (most of which also took medical report in case of administrative harassment) it definitely did not even felt by hardly anyone who is a consumer as mikail predicted.
mikail firtinaci wrote: This
mikail firtinaci
Mikhail, I definitely share your fundamental critique about the role of the unions, I just have trouble believing the unions are so tactless in their actions. I mean, they succeed in getting these "general strikes" covered in the international media and then claim hundreds of thousands came out. If it's all just total bullshit, what's the point in going through the charade at all?
For me, the role of the unions is to keep struggles within a clearly delineated framework that can never fundamentally challenge class society. And it seems that in Turkey, a country with a much higher level of class activity than the US or UK, that this function would be all-the-more-important.
If it's all just purely and clearly hot air, it seems that unions couldn't fill that role. I mean there needs to be the perception that the unions offer some degree of benefit to workers, right?
Chilli Sauce wrote: Mikhail,
Chilli Sauce
Chilli, there was not even a real demo in Istanbul - where I live - with "hundreds of thousands" coming out in the last general strike.
On the role of the unions;
Turk-Is is a police union; pure and simple. In a recent wave of wildcat strike workers wanted to resign from Turk-Is en masse in several factories. The bosses, police and the union fought against them.
DISK (the leftist union confederation) does not even try to organize workers. It acts more like an NGO declaring support for this or that political action.
Whenever non unionized workers call on unions to help them in struggle, it is either because (a) the leftists advise them to do join a union or (b) that they need legal advice. In both cases the workers don't really need the unions but then again they feel themselves weak to rely on their own strength.
short info (in English) about
short info (in English) about all of the pople killed in the attack (The anarcho-syndicalist Ali is at 8th in list)
http://sendika6.org/2015/10/ankara-massacre-100-stories-for-100-martyrs/
Wow, his partner sounds like
Wow, his partner sounds like quite a firecracker as well. What a speech!
Yeah Emel is also another
Yeah Emel is also another comrade of anarchists of Turkey just like Ali. I am looking forward to see her again in Ankara in near future.