Hurricane Harvey: 5 reasons looting is essential for survival

Residents

Looting is a rational response to disaster situations and price gouging. Liberals would prefer people to dehydrate, starve, or drown, while food rots underwater.

Submitted by Mike Harman on August 30, 2017

1. Price gouging and hoarding by capitalists goes unpunished

As Hurricane Harvey has devastated Texas, Best Buy capitalised on the devastation to sell $42 packs of water amidst hundreds of others of cases of price gouging.

Houston's local state has responded to this not by requisitioning water from Best Buy and other retailers, but by enforcing an indefinite curfew between midnight and 5am to prevent looting.

The District Attorney in Harris County issued a statement last night stating that not only had 14 people already been arrested for looting, but that they would have additional punitive sentencing - including life sentences - under a Texas law allowing for harsher penalties during a crisis.

Meanwhile residents at a nursing home were only airlifted out after a photo of them up to their waists in water went viral.

These responses show the liberal state's insistence on enforcing property relations in the face of all basic common sense and regardless of the cost to human life

2. Looting is survival

In an area devastated by floods, people are fleeing flooded homes, rescue support and shelters are inadequately provisioned. Joel Olsteen's Lakewood mega-church in Houston was opened as a temporary shelter only after massive public outcry following an announcement it was going to remain locked.

Stores are the only source of food and water, and it's a choice between directly appropriating goods and death in the most extreme situations. Despite this, Tom Llamas, a journalist from ABC covering the floods, reported people entering an abandoned supermarket to police.

3. The people getting arrested for distributing commodities for free are the same one losing their jobs as stores close

Even if people fleeing flood water wanted to buy food and water, how are they supposed to do so when the stores themselves are closed - are staff expected to keep working and taking money in a metre of water? Of course Julie Turkevitz from the New York Times thinks that's a great idea:

4. Floods aren't the only time that commodity relations lead to starvation

The breakdown of property relations in disaster situations mirrors their irrationality in daily life. Famines are not due to lack of food, but due to lack of money. More than 15 million (over 10%) households in the US are food insecure 1 , food deserts and other issues with access to fresh food mean that 85% of Americans have some kind of vitamin defiency.

5. Looting and other action against price gouging also has a long and rich history in the class struggle

Food riots were a regular occurrence during the American revolution.

On July 22nd 1918, Fisherman's wives began a national wave of rice riots and strike action when they attempted to prevent the export of grain in Toyama, Japan. In the '40s, Japanese workers seized factories and mines to run them directly to produce basic necessities in the face of hoarding by corporations and massive food shortages.

In '70s Italy, workers acted collectively to force transport and electricity price reductions.

Looting is not only normalised during natural disasters but during urban insurrections such as LA 1992 and Ferguson 2014.

  • 1http://www.worldhunger.org/hunger-in-america-2016-united-states-hunger-poverty-facts/

Attachments

Comments

RadBlackLove

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by RadBlackLove on August 30, 2017

harsher looting penalties during a crisis. *sigh*

RadBlackLove

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by RadBlackLove on August 30, 2017

Looting is not only normalised during natural disasters but during urban insurrections such as LA 1992 and Ferguson 2014.

Is normalised quite the right word here? I've only heard of looting be demonized and stigmatized especially during urban riots that people of color participate in

Mike Harman

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Mike Harman on August 30, 2017

Is normalised quite the right word here? I've only heard of looting be demonized and stigmatized especially during urban riots that people of color participate in

It may well be the wrong word. I was thinking of riot situations normalising looting among the people involved - i.e. that people will participate in looting who might never do shoplifting outside that situation. And even in the context of demonization there will be some subset of commentary that sees it as merely an 'excess' in an otherwise justified protest, vs. say isolated ram raiding in a small town which doesn't get any explicit support at all.

Mark.

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Mark. on August 31, 2017

5. Looting and other action against price gouging also has a long and rich history in the class struggle

Food riots were a regular occurrence during the American revolution.

On July 22nd 1918, Fisherman's wives began a national wave of rice riots and strike action when they attempted to prevent the export of grain in Toyama, Japan. In the '40s, Japanese workers seized factories and mines to run them directly to produce basic necessities in the face of hoarding by corporations and massive food shortages.

In '70s Italy, workers acted collectively to force transport and electricity price reductions.

There are examples from Chile as well:

https://www.pri.org/stories/2010-03-01/chile-quake-looting-and-hoarding-streets

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8546411.stm

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/chile-earthquake-looting-reported-as-tsunami-hit-regions-wake-up-to-scenes-of-devastation-10505295.html

Edit: libcom article and thread on this:

https://libcom.org/news/chile-private-property-rule-law-take-priority-over-human-life-post-earthquake-chaos-0203201

RadBlackLove

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by RadBlackLove on August 31, 2017

In the hood them speakers convert real well to ca$$$h.....then you can get shoes, water, clothes, more bread......

Steven.

9 years 1 month ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on September 1, 2017

RadBlackLove

In the hood them speakers convert real well to ca$$$h.....then you can get shoes, water, clothes, more bread......

On that note, for me perhaps the best photo of the LA riots is the guy looting nappies for his kid:

Related content

Submitted by drake on May 26, 2017

Responsibility, accountability and punishment all do have an essential and pivotal role in our society in order to live within boundaries of civility. Unfortunately, contemporary psychiatry views all of this differently. Throughout the course of time, as a society, we have institutionalized mental patients with some form of mistreatment and abuse. Locking patients in a cell, caged in 8’ by 10’ rooms, being subjected to humiliation, mental, verbal, physical and even psychological abuse is not the answer. Reasonable, caring people would definitely disagree. The million-dollar question is why as a civilized society do we not bring about desired changes? Even our elected government officials do not realize that there is room for much improvement. It’s quite obvious, it all has to do with maintaining social control and hold down behaviour to determine what is acceptable and is deemed abnormal, inappropriate, weird/strange, bizarre behaviour. However, we don’t track down, apprehend, lock up, and punish corrupt politicians who constantly implement arbitrary laws that only benefit the rich and ultimately stick it to the poor and other disadvantaged people. Do we go after Wall Street brokers who have literally stolen and screwed working class people’s lives and deprived them of their life savings? If that isn’t two-tier justice, I don’t know what justice is. The history of asylums can be traced back as early as 490 in Jerusalem, Unfortunately, even after all these years, advances in treatments are still lagging behind and are regressive in nature. Psychiatric wards have not fully evolved to treat patients with due respect, understanding compassion. To name a few people, going back in time, French historian, Michel Foucult, condemned the use of institutionalized torture. Former prominent psychiatrist, Franco Basaglia, condemned his own profession of its abuses, including torture, humiliation, clearly stating that it serves as unnecessary punishment and cruelty. Thankfully, the horrific tortures of asylums of the past are history now but there is still much room for improvement Today, at Riverview Hospital and places like Colony Farm in Coquitlam, B.C., patients are not re-habilitated but drugged into a stupor. Doctors, nurses and staff basically just pump their patients with mind-altering, brain/nerve damaging drugs; so therefore, the profession of psychiatry does not have the patients’ best interest at heart. How could those who study and train as medical doctors, swear under the medical oath not to do harm patients end up doing the exact opposite. If the majority of society was well informed they would find it utterly and totally untenable. There are solutions to urban psychiatric wards such as safe houses for people in mental crisis/emotional distress. A couple of examples are a runway house in Germany, Soteria house in California. The cost of “imprisoning” people in psychiatric wards is roughly about a thousand dollars per day per person to run and operate. I encourage and implore people to fully lobby their MP’s and their Provincial MLA’s to bring about progressive measures to treat patients with dignity and the respect they so fully deserve.