Anyone happen to know the actual source for the supposed Haywood quote that goes something like "I've never read Capital but I got the marks of capital all over me"? I'm curious whether this is just another case of authors citing one another without ever actually referencing the original source. For example, the author of the chapter "Radical Cartooning" in the collection Humour and Social Protest, which is one "source" many people cite for the quote, just references another secondary source, Marxism in the United States by Paul Buhle, and that source similarly just says it was something Haywood "reputedly" said without ever providing a direct source. I'm curious whether the quote (which is a good one!) is something Haywood never actually said or if it is something Haywood said without there ever being a written record of it (e.g. in a short speech). I'm curious when people first started attributing the quote to him, whether in something like the Industrial Worker or the International Socialist Review (1900-1918 magazine, not the Trotskyist one). I might try looking through those later, because it would be nice to have the direct source up on here.
Buhle also seems to have put…
Buhle also seems to have put the footnote in the wrong place for when he quotes what Haywood "reputedly" said; it's not clear whether the footnote is for the Haywood quote or for the other stuff Buhle was talking about in the paragraph, but I'm guessing it's the latter case. The footnote also references two sources. The first source is a page in Paul Sweezy's chapter "The Influence of Marxian Economics on American Thought and Practice" in the anthology Socialism and American Life, Vol. 1. I checked this source and there is no mention of Haywood, leading me to believe that the footnote is in the wrong place and is in reference to other stuff in that paragraph. The other source in the footnote is a letter from the American publisher/socialist Charles Kerr to the American Marxist Louis Boudin. I believe this source is in a physical archive somewhere and is not available online, but I'm guessing it's also in reference to the other stuff Buhle was talking about in that paragraph and has nothing to do with the Haywood quote. I'm assuming it's a source for how Kerr "pleaded with Boudin" to change the title of a book he was publishing through him. Here's the relevant part of that paragraph:
After reading a bit more, it…
After reading a bit more, it seems like something he might have just often said in response to being asked if he was a Marxist or had ever read Marx. I'm still going to try and find the earliest attribution of the quote to him though.
The earliest reference I can…
The earliest reference I can find explicitly linking the quote to Haywood is in the Vol. 1 No. 10 issue of the Industrial Pioneer (February 1924), specifically as part of the dialogue in a "play" by Phil Engle:
Quite the play...
Interestingly there's also an earlier reference in the Vol. 1 No. 1 (July 1919) issue of The Communist, which was the paper of the Communist Party of America. However, the paper does not attribute the quote to Haywood; it just appears as an isolated quote under a "Communiques" column:
There may be an earlier reference to the quote that connects it to Haywood, but I haven't found it yet. In any case, I'm pretty sure Haywood also read Marx (and Engels)... considering how he co-authored a book with Frank Bohn, i.e. Industrial Socialism, in which they present Marx's and Engels' writings on surplus value, class struggle, and historical materialism in a condensed and simplified form.
Very interesting! Please do…
Very interesting! Please do continue to look into this and let us know what you find
I think, though of course…
I think, though of course could be wrong (please correct me if I am!), that Buhle is one of the first scholars to attribute the quote to Haywood, specifically in the above 1987 work Marxism in the United States. There are no references to this quote in the "classic histories" of the IWW by authors like Melvyn Dubofsky (We Shall Be All, 1969) and Fred Thompson (The IWW: Its First Fifty Years, 1955). Similarly there are no references to the quote in biographies like Roughnecks: The Life and Times of Bill Haywood (1983) and Haywood's own autobiography The Autobiography of Big Bill Haywood (posthumously published in 1929). And then of course you have a bunch of contemporary writers who are just citing one another or Buhle's work, which again never provided a source, as evidence of the quote.
It's just speculation, but I'm curious whether Buhle came across Phil Engle's play in the Industrial Pioneer (Vol. 1 No. 10, February 1924) and attributed the quote to Haywood on the basis of that. It's strange, however, because as mentioned above The Communist newspaper (Vol. 1 No. 1, July 1919) seems to have been the first source to print the quote, and it never attributed it to Haywood. It could be worth reaching out to Buhle to see what he was basing the quote on.
As far as primary sources are concerned, the closest thing I could find in terms of the quote, besides the two sources mentioned above, is an account of a Haywood speech in the International Socialist Review (Vol. 11 No. 10, April 1911):
It certainly sounds like this speech could have been one in which Haywood used the quote, but I haven't had any luck finding a transcription of it. Other speeches, like his "Socialism: The Hope of the Working Class," were transcribed in newspapers like the International Socialist Review, but it doesn't seem like there's a transcription for this particular speech.
There is also another quote attributed to Haywood, also appearing in the International Socialist Review (Vol. 12 No. 3, September 1911), that is similar in meaning to the original quote but which never mentions Marx:
That's all I could find. I bulk searched the Industrial Worker (from dates 1909 to 1927; using issues from the Marxist Internet Archive and the IWW's official website), the Industrial Union Bulletin (from dates 1907 to 1909; MIA), International Socialist Review (from dates 1900 to 1918; MIA), Revolt: The Voice of the Militant Worker (from dates 1911 to 1912; MIA), Solidarity (from dates 1909 to 1917; MIA), and Industrial Pioneer (from dates 1921 to 1926; Internet Archive; the only occurrence was the one source mentioned above). It's probably more info than we need to know, but I downloaded the above archives (except for the Industrial Pioneer) in their entirety using wget (I'm thankful the MIA hasn't blocked my IP...), performed bulk ocr recognition on them using ocrmypdf, and then bulk searched them using pdfgrep. For the search terms, I used expressions like "marks of," "Marx's Capital," "never read" and other similar phrases. There are some other IWW newspapers from this time, but I didn't search those and I doubt the quote appears in them.
It wouldn't surprise me if Haywood used the quote; the above-mentioned speech in Detroit seems like the most promising lead. It could also be the case, as already alluded to, that it was just a quote that he often used when asked about reading Marx or theory, and for which there is not really much of a written record of.
We could try to reach out to…
We could try to reach out to Paul Buhle to ask for more information, should we give it a go? We would be very interested to find this out
Yeah, that would be great…
Yeah, that would be great. Hopefully I'm not overlooking something super obvious.
Charles M. O'Brien's…
Charles M. O'Brien's unpublished autobiography (which is in a physical archive) might also be a source for the quote. Here's Rosemont in his book Joe Hill: The IWW & the Making of a Revolutionary Workingclass Counterculture:
hmm TBH maybe that is enough…
hmm TBH maybe that is enough of a source to go on? If he was personal friends with Haywood. That being the case not sure it would be worth contacting Buhle.
Yeah, that's certainly a…
Yeah, that's certainly a credible source for the existence of the Haywood quote. I guess we don't have to bother with it now, though I am still sort of curious what source Buhle was referring to in his text, whether it was O'Brien's unpublished autobiography, the Phil Engle play, or something else. Buhle was also writing before Rosemont, who originally published the above book in 2003.
So we spoke with Buhle, and…
So we spoke with Buhle, and he very kindly emailed us back and said he doesn't have the time to look up where he came across it first (unsurprising as it was basically 40 years ago), but the reported quote was commonplace and specifically, "part of the lore of Greenwich Village, since the 1910s".
So it does seem like the Joe Hill book citing the unpublished autobiography is the best citable source.
Thanks for the update. It's…
Thanks for the update. It's a shame that the unpublished autobiography doesn't seem to be available online anywhere.
Maybe you could try…
Maybe you could try contacting the author of the Joe Hill book about that? He might be able to get permission from whoever showed him it?
Franklin Rosemont has…
Franklin Rosemont has unfortunately passed away. I'll keep searching around though. We could possibly contact the University of Michigan archive where the source is held and request a scan, but I'm not sure if they would even allow that. I also don't know anything about what page number to ask for, assuming the document even has page numbers. I'm still not convinced that the quote doesn't appear in some IWW newspaper somewhere (before the 1924 Industrial Pioneer reference), so I might continue looking there.