Reflections of a young man on the choice of a profession - Karl Marx

Young Marx reflects on choosing a career path in 1835.

Submitted by pogo on April 10, 2015


1835 Reflections of a Young Man by Karl Marx




Karl Marx

Reflections of a Young Man
on The Choice of a Profession[1]


Source: MECW Volume 1

Written: between August 10 and 16, 1835

First published: in Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 1925

Translated from the Latin.

Transcribed: by Sally Ryan.


Nature herself has determined the sphere of activity in which the animal should move, and it peacefully moves within that sphere, without attempting to go beyond it, without even an inkling of any other. To man, too, the Deity gave a general aim, that of ennobling mankind and himself, but he left it to man to seek the means by which this aim can be achieved; he left it to him to choose the position in society most suited to him, from which he can best uplift himself and society.

This choice is a great privilege of man over the rest of creation, but at the same time it is an act which can destroy his whole life, frustrate all his plans, and make him unhappy. Serious consideration of this choice, therefore, is certainly the first duty of a young man who is beginning his career and does not want to leave his most important affairs to chance.

Everyone has an aim in view, which to him at least seems great, and actually is so if the deepest conviction, the innermost voice of the heart declares it so, for the Deity never leaves mortal man wholly without a guide; he speaks softly but with certainty.

But this voice can easily be drowned, and what we took for inspiration can be the product of the moment, which another moment can perhaps also destroy. Our imagination, perhaps, is set on fire, our emotions excited, phantoms flit before our eyes, and we plunge headlong into what impetuous instinct suggests, which we imagine the Deity himself has pointed out to us. But what we ardently embrace soon repels us and we see our whole existence in ruins.

We must therefore seriously examine whether we have really been inspired in our choice of a profession, whether an inner voice approves it, or whether this inspiration is a delusion, and what we took to be a call from the Deity was self-deception. But how can we recognise this except by tracing the source of the inspiration itself?

What is great glitters, its glitter arouses ambition, and ambition can easily have produced the inspiration, or what we took for inspiration; but reason can no longer restrain the man who is tempted by the demon of ambition, and he plunges headlong into what impetuous instinct suggests: he no longer chooses his position in life, instead it is determined by chance and illusion.

Nor are we called upon to adopt the position which offers us the most brilliant opportunities; that is not the one which, in the long series of years in which we may perhaps hold it, will never tire us, never dampen our zeal, never let our enthusiasm grow cold, but one in which we shall soon see our wishes unfulfilled, our ideas unsatisfied, and we shall inveigh against the Deity and curse mankind.

But it is not only ambition which can arouse sudden enthusiasm for a particular profession; we may perhaps have embellished it in our imagination, and embellished it so that it appears the highest that life can offer. We have not analysed it, not considered the whole burden, the great responsibility it imposes on us; we have seen it only from a distance, and distance is deceptive.

Our own reason cannot be counsellor here; for it is supported neither by experience nor by profound observation, being deceived by emotion and blinded by fantasy. To whom then should we turn our eyes? Who should support us where our reason forsakes us?

Our parents, who have already travelled life's road and experienced the severity of fate - our heart tells us.

And if then our enthusiasm still persists, if we still continue to love a profession and believe ourselves called to it after we have examined it in cold blood, after we have perceived its burdens and become acquainted with its difficulties, then we ought to adopt it, then neither does our enthusiasm deceive us nor does overhastiness carry us away.

But we cannot always attain the position to which we believe we are called; our relations in society have to some extent already begun to be established before we are in a position to determine them.

Our physical constitution itself is often a threatening obstacle, and let no one scoff at its rights.

It is true that we can rise above it; but then our downfall is all the more rapid, for then we are venturing to build on crumbling ruins, then our whole life is an unhappy struggle between the mental and the bodily principle. But he who is unable to reconcile the warring elements within himself, how can he resist life's tempestuous stress, how can he act calmly? And it is from calm alone that great and fine deeds can arise; it is the only soil in which ripe fruits successfully develop.

Although we cannot work for long and seldom happily with a physical constitution which is not suited to our profession, the thought nevertheless continually arises of sacrificing our well-being to duty, of acting vigorously although we are weak. But if we have chosen a profession for which we do not possess the talent, we can never exercise it worthily, we shall soon realise with shame our own incapacity and tell ourselves that we are useless created beings, members of society who are incapable of fulfilling their vocation. Then the most natural consequence is self-contempt, and what feeling is more painful and less capable of being made up for by all that the outside world has to offer? Self-contempt is a serpent that ever gnaws at one's breast, sucking the life-blood from one's heart and mixing it with the poison of misanthropy and despair.

An illusion about our talents for a profession which we have closely examined is a fault which takes its revenge on us ourselves, and even if it does not meet with the censure of the outside world it gives rise to more terrible pain in our hearts than such censure could inflict.

If we have considered all this, and if the conditions of our life permit us to choose any profession we like, we may adopt the one that assures us the greatest worth, one which is based on ideas of whose truth we are thoroughly convinced, which offers us the widest scope to work for mankind, and for ourselves to approach closer to the general aim for which every profession is but a means - perfection.

Worth is that which most of all uplifts a man, which imparts a higher nobility to his actions and all his endeavours, which makes him invulnerable, admired by the crowd and raised above it.

But worth can be assured only by a profession in which we are not servile tools, but in which we act independently in our own sphere. It can be assured only by a profession that does not demand reprehensible acts, even if reprehensible only in outward appearance, a profession which the best can follow with noble pride. A profession which assures this in the greatest degree is not always the highest, but is always the most to be preferred.

But just as a profession which gives us no assurance of worth degrades us, we shall as surely succumb under the burdens of one which is based on ideas that we later recognise to be false.

There we have no recourse but to self-deception, and what a desperate salvation is that which is obtained by self-betrayal!

Those professions which are not so much involved in life itself as concerned with abstract truths are the most dangerous for the young man whose principles are not yet firm and whose convictions are not yet strong and unshakeable. At the same time these professions may seem to be the most exalted if they have taken deep root in our hearts and if we are capable of sacrificing our lives and all endeavours for the ideas which prevail in them.

They can bestow happiness on the man who has a vocation for them, but they destroy him who adopts them rashly, without reflection, yielding to the impulse of the moment.

On the other hand, the high regard we have for the ideas on which our profession is based gives us a higher standing in society, enhances our own worth, and makes our actions un-challengeable.

One who chooses a profession he values highly will shudder at the idea of being unworthy of it; he will act nobly if only because his position in society is a noble one.

But the chief guide which must direct us in the choice of a profession is the welfare of mankind and our own perfection. It should not be thought that these two interests could be in conflict, that one would have to destroy the other; on the contrary, man's nature is so constituted that he can attain his own perfection only by working for the perfection, for the good, of his fellow men.

If he works only for himself, he may perhaps become a famous man of learning, a great sage, an excellent poet, but he can never be a perfect, truly great man.

History calls those men the greatest who have ennobled themselves by working for the common good; experience acclaims as happiest the man who has made the greatest number of people happy; religion itself teaches us that the ideal being whom all strive to copy sacrificed himself for the sake of mankind, and who would dare to set at nought such judgments?

If we have chosen the position in life in which we can most of all work for mankind, no burdens can bow us down, because they are sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions, our deeds will live on quietly but perpetually at work, and over our ashes will be shed the hot tears of noble people.

Marx

Comments

Kureigo-San

11 years 6 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Kureigo-San on April 10, 2015

This basically describes my early 20's,

Emilio42

12 months ago

Submitted by Emilio42 on November 2, 2025

Kureigo-San, what's your conclusion?
- someone in their early 20s.

adri

11 months 3 weeks ago

Submitted by adri on November 9, 2025

Nature herself has determined the sphere of activity in which the animal should move, and it peacefully moves within that sphere, without attempting to go beyond it, without even an inkling of any other. To man, too, the Deity gave a general aim, that of ennobling mankind and himself, but he left it to man to seek the means by which this aim can be achieved; he left it to him to choose the position in society most suited to him, from which he can best uplift himself and society.

This choice is a great privilege of man over the rest of creation, but at the same time it is an act which can destroy his whole life, frustrate all his plans, and make him unhappy. Serious consideration of this choice, therefore, is. . . .

All of this was of course before Marx struck gold finding Engels. See the Kupferberg drawing.

(I'm partly kidding—I know Marx earned money with his writings and other stuff.)

adri

11 months 3 weeks ago

Submitted by adri on November 9, 2025

More related to the archive, I would probably just delete the parent item for this text and the rest of these MECW transcriptions. There is absolutely no way anyone is going to transcribe or copy and paste all 50 volumes of the MECW and create separate articles for each text. People can just see the volumes of the MECW themselves, which are on here and elsewhere.

westartfromhere

11 months 3 weeks ago

Submitted by westartfromhere on November 9, 2025

Engels Geld was not forthcoming in saving the life of Edgar, 'the poor child was a victim of bourgeois misère'.

Related content

Submitted by goff on February 20, 2025

9/1 is a lot shorter than I’d have it. Have to give the devil its due, this is decently prescriptive.

- - -

A worldwide libertarian communist revolution—combining the anti-authoritarian ethos of libertarianism with the classless, stateless vision of communism—faces steep challenges but could theoretically succeed through a mix of strategy, timing, and historical luck. Let’s break it down into what it would take, step by step, while keeping it grounded in practical and speculative reasoning.

Core Concept
Libertarian communism seeks a society without hierarchies, private property, or centralized authority, where resources are managed collectively and individual freedom is maximized. Think anarcho-communism (e.g., Kropotkin or the Spanish CNT-FAI in 1936) but scaled globally. Success hinges on dismantling capitalism and the state while avoiding new tyrannies—like the Soviet or Maoist outcomes—through decentralized, voluntary cooperation.

Global Discontent with Capitalism
A revolution needs a spark. Widespread anger at inequality, climate collapse, or corporate overreach could prime the pump. Imagine a 2030s scenario: automation guts jobs, wealth concentrates further (top 1% owns 60%+), and ecological crises displace billions. People reject both neoliberalism and populist strongmen, creating an appetite for radical alternatives.

Decentralized Coordination
Unlike top-down Marxist revolutions, this one can’t rely on a vanguard. Modern tech—encrypted platforms, blockchain for resource tracking, or AI-driven logistics—could enable leaderless networks to organize. Picture X-like platforms evolving into global assemblies where workers, farmers, and techies self-coordinate strikes, mutual aid, and production handoffs without a Politburo.

Mass Defection from Power Structures
For the state and capital to crumble, key players must walk away. Military and police defections (e.g., soldiers refusing orders, as in Russia 1917) plus corporate insiders leaking resources or sabotaging from within could kneecap enforcement. A tipping point might come if, say, 30% of a nation’s workforce and security apparatus join the cause, paralyzing opposition.

Economic Self-Sufficiency
Post-revolution, communities must feed and power themselves without global trade or bosses. Localized production—3D printing, renewable microgrids, urban farming—could sustain a transition. Historical precedent: during the Spanish Civil War, anarchist collectives ran factories and farms, producing efficiently until Franco’s forces crushed them.

Cultural Shift
People need to want this. Propaganda (memes, art, manifestos) must sell mutual aid over individualism while dodging accusations of utopianism. Education systems, already crumbling in some places, could be co-opted to teach cooperation and anti-authority values, seeding a generational pivot.

How It Plays Out
Phase 1: Collapse and Opportunity
A global crisis (economic crash, war, or climate event) weakens states and markets. Protests escalate into general strikes. In, say, 2032, a “Global Spring” sees workers seize factories from Shanghai to Detroit, ports shut down, and digital currencies crash as hackers redistribute wealth.
Phase 2: Power Vacuum
Governments fall or retreat. Militias form but lack unity to suppress decentralized uprisings. Communes emerge—some rural, some urban—linked by tech and trade barter. X posts might read: “Berlin collective shares solar tech; who’s got grain?”
Phase 3: Scaling Up
Success spreads via contagion. If one region (e.g., Catalonia 2.0) thrives—low crime, high output—others copy it. The revolution dodges civil war by focusing on sabotage (e.g., cutting elite supply chains) over pitched battles, wearing down holdouts.
Phase 4: Stabilization
After a decade, most of the world runs on federated councils. Property’s gone; work’s voluntary but socially expected. Conflicts linger—some hoard, some slack—but peer pressure and resource abundance (thanks to tech) keep it viable.

Why It Might Work
Tech Leverage: Tools like AI and decentralized networks solve old logistical nightmares (e.g., the Soviet planning mess).
Historical Precedent: Short-lived wins (Paris Commune 1871, Rojava today) show small-scale feasibility.
Human Nature: Cooperation thrives under pressure—studies like Elinor Ostrom’s commons research suggest people can self-manage without coercion.

Why It Might Fail
Power Vacuums: Warlords or new states could fill the gap, as in post-1917 Russia.
Scale: Coordinating 8 billion people without hierarchy is a logistical monster—local successes might not globalize.
Resistance: Capitalists and nationalists won’t go quietly; expect drones, mercenaries, and propaganda wars.

Odds and X-Factor
Realistically, a full global win might sit at 5-10% odds in the next century, barring a perfect storm of crises and tech breakthroughs. The X-factor? A wildcard like Musk-level innovation (ironic, given his capitalism) repurposed for communal ends—say, Starlink democratizing communication or Tesla tech powering free energy grids.
Could it happen? Yes, if the stars align and humanity bets on trust over control.

goff

1 year 8 months ago

Submitted by goff on February 20, 2025

How: Study agitprop—Kropotkin’s pamphlets or Occupy’s memes. Use AI tools (like me!) to draft sharp, shareable content. Hit X hard: “Day 1: No landlords, no CEOs. Who’s in?”

lol