An article by Salvador Zana, a volunteer with YPG in Rojava.
The problem that we face today is not a new one. Its roots lie more than 6000 years ago with the roots of civilization itself. It was then that some ideas took hold which attacked society like a deadly virus and after a long struggle managed to infect the very core of human communities everywhere. These ideas are essentially opposed to the very nature of humankind and of life itself: that oppression and slavery are necessary, that they are right and that humans deserve them. The subjugation of nature paved the way for the subjugation of women, the subjugation of women in turn enabled the enslavement of men by other men. We have since lived under the yoke of these evils inflicted on us, being aware of their presence without ever truly understanding them. I will not elaborate this point, as one of the great things about Ocalan is that he has developed a more thourough analysis of these issues than I or any other human could hope to perform in our times (although I hope on this prognosis I will be proved mistaken). Much more urgent is to emphasize that he has published these analyses of the development of state and civilization and suggested solutions to our most pressing problems.
Countless wise, passionate and courageous persons have since taken on the fight against this system, ever changing its outer manifestation but leaving its core intact. Instead of overcoming it they gave the system powerful new weapons, their movements' strenghts were absorbed by the insatiable Leviathan. This has been the fate of all revolutionary struggles through history that were capable of challenging the global hegemony.
These movements have a common basis. They appear in next to all imaginable forms – as religions, struggles for autonomy and independence, philosophical schools, cultural movements, ideologies calling themselves socialism, communism or anarchism. As different as they may seem, they are fueled by the same universal desires for freedom, peace and siblinghood. However advanced and successful the system may be, nowhere has it been able to quench the longing for these goals that exist in every human society. It has however managed to channel the energies which arise from the stark contrast between these wishes and the societal reality for its own purposes. The people's struggles moved against singular governments or priviliged groups in the best and against social minorities and other kinds of arbitrary scapegoats in the worst case. The divide and rule credo has brought the oppressed to fight each other while the means of achieving unity remain in the hands of the oppressors, based more than anything on the hegemonial privilege of knowledge.
Most struggles fail because they lack an analytical basis, an understanding of the dynamics of society that is necessary to target the true origins of the crisis humankind has fallen into. This is what makes Ocalan one of the most outstanding revolutionaries of all time. He has managed to present a profound analysis of the crisis, developed an alternative to the current dilemma and brought in motion a movement that is willing to fight for this way out of the crisis, targeting its roots and not just symptoms of the problem. The establishment of the autonomy of Rojava as a confederation of stateless democratic communities can today be seen as the greatest success of more than forty years relentless revolutionary struggle.
The Rojava project is now at a crucial stage. If it stays isolated the military and economic necessities along with the ideological pressure of the hegemonial capitalist paradigma will force it to develop into some kind of liberal socialist state at best. To be successful the liberation of society needs to expand into the bordering parts of Kurdistan and, even more importantly, the societies of the wider Middle East. The model of autonomous communities administrating themselves and interacting in decentralized confederations can only thrive if it expands. The Rojava revolution promises the liberation of society, ecological development and the freedom of women as its basic mechanisms. It is vital for its success that all three points are wholeheartedly put into practice.
The current socio-political quarantine as well as the exhausting war are poisonous to the development of revolutionary ways of life in a society to which they are still very new. Nothing leads to dangerous compromises with the system like the pressure of war.
To avoid making unforgivable mistakes at this stage we need to learn from the examples of similar revolutionary projects in history. It surprises how staunchly similar the Spanish civil war situation 1936-1938 is to what is now happening in Mesopotamia. A communal, anti-state revolution brought in motion by a people's organization (PYD, CNT), the tensions between the central state and a people (Kurds, Catalans) within it striving for autonomy, a revolutionary fighting force (YPG, FAI) defending the country against a clerical-fascist counter-revolution (Daesh, Franco) in alliance with opportunist groups (Peshmerga, PSUC) who enjoy the support of the international powers (NATO, USSR)... Without doubt there are also mayor differences between both situations, most notably maybe between the Catalan anarchists and the Ocalan movement (the analytical comparison of these two revolutions is definitely material to fill more than one book), but the Catalan example is indispensable to understand about the great dangers we are in now.
The revolutionary transformation in Catalonia was compromised more and more under pressure from the communist and right-wing-socialists in the unity government. While the revolutionary anarchists were bound to the front by the fascist attacks, the opportunists step by step took over the control of the cities behind the frontlines, preparing to betray the revolutionaries. Citing the necessities of the war they drove the workers' councils out of the factories, reinstated repressive mechanisms and formed a mandatory 'People's Army' (corresponding to Rojavas Erka Parastina, service in which is mandatory for all able young men for six months) until finally they betrayed first the revolutionary socialists and then the anarchists, storming their centres in the cities and murdering thousands of them. The result was that the fascists overran what was left at the time of the Spanish republic.
We must never forget how easily everything we fight for can be lost if we are inattentive for one moment. It is so tempting to ease the long and difficult road to freedom by making concessions and arrangements with the system. Only must we realize that, if we take another way, this road will be lost. The war has caused us to pull all our energies and resources to the front, causing a dangerous stagnation in the revolutionary development in society. Achieving our goals requires a change of very deeply rooted ideas, a revolution of mindsets. It will take more than one generation. We must set it in motion now if our fight shall lead to more than a mention in textbooks fifty years from now.
Rojava has yet to prove that it can realize its vision of a republic without a state. It owes this effort not only to its own people, but to all those around the globe who today look to Mesopotamia with the hope that there is now an idea taking hold more powerful than all fascists of the world. This hope and this idea might be able to lead to something that is bigger than Kurdistan or the Middle East. It can lead to a new beginning in revolutionary undertakings around the globe.
It is wrong to merely criticise the establishment of the Erka Parastina without looking to the reasons of its formation. There is simply no alternative to resisting against Daesh at all costs – and YPG/YPJ alone can hardly muster the necessary numbers. Forced recruitment is never acceptable. But why did it become the only option? All internationalist revolutionaries have to give a hard self-critique about this. The defence of the Rojava revolution is our indiscussable responsibility. If we had filled up the ranks of our comrades in time they might never have had to resort to one of they most despiccable instruments of the state – forcing boys and young men to go to war.
It is not to late to take the right steps. Rojava has become a revolutionary center for people from all continents who have come to help. This gives us a great shot at the unity we so desperately need to win. At the moment our enemies know us better than we know each other. Rojava can be more than an example. It can be the common ground on which we come togheter to march as one against nation, state and oppression. And towards a new future.
Salvador Zana is an internationalist revolutionary with roots in Europe and Africa. He is currently with YPG in Cizîre canton of Rojava.
Originally posted: April 7, 2015 at ANF News
Comments
Well this is published in ANF
Well this is published in ANF website (which is pretty much official news source of kurdish movement) I am actually really surprised to see this text -written this clearly- and shared to world in ANF. It actually also shocked me to see such article published there in today's conditions (ongoing war, conscription, relations with imperial powers etc...) Well if they are willing to accept what this article can bring to them (in terms of global politics -we are anti-capitalist- and/or internal institutions -well we forced you to take arms, but we also think like you: it is a bad thing to force people to do so.), well I can only salute their bravery and determination for revolution. What is important is they clearly show that :
1) Their global policy does not depend on imperial powers, but international solidarity of comrades.
2) They are perfectly aware that this project needs to expand to be "real". (so they do not go for a small island or regional hegemony etc.)
3) They are a progressive force -not to reach a liberal state-, but to form a new society.
You should add it to the
You should add it to the library Kurrem.
@kurrme what really surprised
@kurrme what really surprised me was the ridiculous adulation of ocalan who according to this article is "one of the most outstanding revolutionaries of all time"
Soapy wrote: @kurrme what
Soapy
Absurd as it may look this discourse is actually an expression of PKKs internal ideological operation. There is a logic and purpose in this. "Discussion" in the PKK is organized around a clear structure based on these basic steps:
1- It starts by admitting or acknowledging the existence of a problem or several problems.
2- Since the leader can not be mistaken the problem(s) must be found among the rank&file, in the ignorance of the people, laziness of the party members etc.
3- Hence the problems are individualized/
4- Then finally they are confessed and recognized in the form of guilt, deserving at least moral self-punishment.
You can see this in the way the essay ends with a "self-criticism" of "international forces" for lagging behind in showing enough enthusiasm, in supporting the "revolution" with full zeal.
Crushing the personality and self-confidence of militants is a technique that stalinist organizations advanced, and PKK is excelled at that. With a bookchinist/activist flavor this is being put into circulation again.
I did not write this article
I did not write this article they did. So you see a clear pixture of them with the best and maybe some bad. It is up to you to decide. However what i am saying is this: this is a good representation of their ideology and also maybe the limits of the same ideology. But it adresses many issues discussed here.
Mikail I see no point in
Mikail I see no point in debating you. Have fun in your world where bookchinian proposals become Stalinism. And every bad thing in the world some how have to do with Ocalan. Well if Ocalan (or Kurdish movement) is held dear to Kurds. It is basically the result of the failures of likes of you in Turkish socialist movement.
You were writing here -before Kobane is liberated-, it is a lost cause and all remaining people can be killed by IS. Now they liberated Rojava and write a beautiful article related to their aims and possible problems of their future project. But the only thing you can see is Ocalan. Well he is indeed praised but it is because the people who trust him take up arms and defended people's land to death. Ocalan was even not there. I doubt Ocalan had anything to do with Rojova as war or as revolution (except on ideological level) Get rid of your childish picture god damn it. And in this conditions why should they criticize their own ideology or Ocalan as a theoretician. Their ideology is now working perfectly in a certain situation. We will see their willingness to criticize even Ocalan if things change and need arises.
Kurremkarmerruk, You and
Kurremkarmerruk,
You and chauvinists like you are in no position to order me anything. I am not afraid of your kind.
I don't know, this article
I don't know, this article feels pretty Maoist to me.
I wouldn't say Maoist.
I wouldn't say Maoist. Enthusiastic, yes. Hero-worshippy, undoubtedly so.
Salvador Zana: Quote: I will
Salvador Zana:
I uploaded it to library. I
I uploaded it to library. I will not comment on it anymore. It is yours to contemplate to.
rat wrote: Salvador
rat
Yes, comments like that really do set off a few alarm bells here and there.
[youtube]g6yTRq_rJg4[/youtube]
Yeah serge's comment from the
Yeah serge's comment from the replica is right. I do not know where this picture come from. I dont know who put it to library. The other one is better tagged and I plan to put a good picture if we deleate this one I would be glad (moderators?)
https://docs.google.com/docum
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rh9zii64eVMtfF5cwEKpx1QAKk9ZP4lDkGl4OSzXiSI/edit
kurremkarmerruk, I deleted
kurremkarmerruk, I deleted your other post of this in the library because this had already been changed from a forum to a library entry.
Ok thanks
Ok thanks
It is good to hear a voice
It is good to hear a voice against conscription from inside the YPG. Its good to see ANF News publish such a criticism.
Apparently people are not
Apparently people are not happy of criticisms of conscription and the openness of ANF as you immediately get 4 down votes :D
The article does indeed
The article does indeed praise Ocalan as an almost unfallible leader, and by calling the movement ""Ocalanist "i ts writer does a disservice to the struggle. I have come to distrust any political or social movement that calls itself after one individual (yes, that includes Marxism) Yes, there is hero worship here I find distatesteful and dangerous.
At the same time, ihe article does contain critical elements which are to be applauded. The fact that a disctinct lack of support fo conscription is expressed, within a pro-PKK article, is remarkable. And stressing that a Rojava in isolation cannot survive as a revolutionary society, is good as well. But the question then becomes: if you want to extend the movement from below, does that sit well with seeking alliances from above? What if people in a pro-American state - Turkey, Iraq, Saudi-Arabia, Jordan - get Rojava-like ideas? Do you then support these people? And do you think that the US will then keep on supporting you with bombs? Are you willing to give up US support in order to extend the revolutionary possibilie ties from below? Or will things go the other way around, and will everey whiff of solidarity beyond borders be sacrificed for power politics?
The comparison between 1936 Catalonia and 2015 Rojava, by the way, should be critically ripped to pieces. The FAI was not the armed wing of the CNT,as the comparison implies, but more a network of ideologically inspired affinity groups and activists. The 'armed wing' of the movement was not the FAI but the CNT militias. And the driving force in Barcelona was not the issue of Catalan autonomy that got revolutionary dimensions, as is the case in Rojava with the Kurdish struggle. It was plain class struggle that happened to be strong in the industrial city of Barcelona which happend to in the Catalan part of the Spanish state. There was not much specifically 'Catalan' about it, and the revolution was very strong in the countryside of Aragon as well.
There WAS an aspiration for Catalan autonomy. But that was expressed through bourgois Republicanism (Companys cum suis), not through the CNT. The comparison with the Kurdish fight for national self-determination simply does not apply.
To summarize: Rojava is a national struggle that got more radical dimensions, maybe with anticapitalist possibilities. In Spain the struggle started out openly anticapitalist from the very beginning, but got derailed.
There is much more to be said about this article, unbalanced but interesting as it is. But I will leave it at this, for now.
Well here is some "etymology"
Well here is some "etymology" by me :D I had never heard Ocalanist used in english. In turkish you can call kurdish movement "apocular" which means ocalanists. "Apocular" first appeared as a pejorative term to name the pkk (among more established Turkish left), as most of the pejorative usages it sticked and later accepted by the movement. Now as the pkk is in a process of "turkey-isation" and possible dearming it is not much used by them. However Turkish nationalists never stopped using it. There are some pretty nasty slogans attached to it to curse the "racial line" of Kurds.
iirc I tongue-in-cheekily
iirc I tongue-in-cheekily referred to the cheerful mob at the Newroz carnival in Diyarbakir as doing the Apo-Calypso on my social media feed.
rooieravotr wrote: The FAI
rooieravotr
Not entirely correct. From the early 1920s onwards the defence of teh CNT against the employers hired pistoleros, was carried out by FAI groups like the famous "Nosotros"/"Los Solidarios" which made paramilitaries like Durruti, Ascaso and Garcia Oliver famous. In some ways it was the lionised status they gained as a result of their armed activity that meant they were able to lead so many cenetistas, anarchists and non-anarchists, into the compromise with the Generalitat and then the Republican government.
By the same author Middle
By the same author Middle Eastern power plays and the People's Spring
Latest from Salvador
Latest from Salvador Zana:
Middle Eastern Power Plays and the People's Spring Rojava
It points out Saudi Arabia and the GCC are more interesting in fighting Shia than fighting Daesh. It puts Rojava in the context of Arab Spring. It claims the failures of various Arab Spring movements were caused by their lack or organization. It reiterates the multi-ethnic character of Rojava revolution. It claims some rebel groups around Aleppo have joined the YPG. It claims a "vibrant exchange of ideas in the Aleppo region between Arab and Kurdish communities". It reiterates opposition to Assad.
I imagine we'll being hearing more from Salvador Zana.
ocelot wrote: rooieravotr
ocelot
Not that this thread should turn into a Spanish anarchy nerd off but this is also misleading, ocelot. For one thing, the second sentence is quite obviously incorrect since the FAI did not exist in the early 20s, so in the most famous years of pistolerismo the action groups cannot have been composed of FAI members. The FAI's (broadly unfair and misleading) link to anarchist violence came about during the radicalisation of the CNT in the early part of the 2nd Republic. The Nosotros group did not affiliate to the FAI until 1933.
Some details on the Sheikh
Some details on the Sheikh Maksoud neighborhood in northwest Aleppo under the control of the YPG, 02/2015:
Aleppo's displaced find refuge in Kurdish regions
Ethnically diverse disaster communism of the newly lumpen proletariat.
In 2013:
The Kurdish Factor
Unlike the more homogenous
Kurdish Strategy Towards Ethnically-Mixed Areas in the Syrian Conflict, December 13, 2013
Quote: Aleppo had become safe
YPG Aleppo commander: Syrian regime failed to regain control over Kurdish neighborhoods, 02/10/2015
In light of Salvador Zana's
In light of Salvador Zana's statements about Aleppo, he seems to be politically priming the pump for some YPG Arab-Kurd resistance to Assad specifically in Aleppo:
If they move against the regime in the rest of Aleppo, I would't be surprised if they declared another canton. O.K. I would be surprised. That would be a pretty amazing change in the situation. If the YPG has brought secular Arab rebels into a realignment with them on the TEV-DEM program, that would be significant.
Here is what Aleppo looks like right now:
another map
Sounds like the Assembly in Şêx Meqsȗd (Sheikh Maksoud) is pushing that Project for a Democratic Syria statement hard in Aleppo.
TEV-DEM project is for all Syrian components 3/29/2015
I had thought that TEV-DEM statement on a Project for a Democratic Syria was something being pushed out of Cizre or Afrin as a hope to hold onto autonomy if Assad came out on top. But, with it being pushed in Aleppo, it may be an attempt to realign rebels there under a YPG banner.
Here is an article from 2013 on YPG recruitment of Arab FSA fighters in Aleppo: Arabs join Kurdish militia in Aleppo 2/9/2013
Quote: Abdurrahman Saleh, a
Kurdish-Arab Rebel Alliance May be Key to Obama’s Syrian Strategy, Mutlu Civiroglu and Wladimir Van Wilgenburg, February 12, 2015
I've met Mutlu Civiroglu and tend to regard his analysis and information as reliable. Though saying this is Obama's plan seems rather like a click-bait headline.
I knew about Euphrates Volcano and their success in Kobane and at the Qara Qawzak.bridge, and now the Lafarge cement plant. I didn't know the scope of cooperation the YPG had built up with Arabs and/or the FSA in Aleppo.
Whatever the PYD is... it is
Whatever the PYD is... it is ambitious.
Coordinator of security relations in the Alshamia front: Blessing the YPG and the nation-state has failed in Syria and self-management is successful experience, 4/4/2015
Based on the flag behind
Based on the flag behind Ghazal, this is Levant Front. Curious that he is using such TEV-DEMish rhetoric for a front of so many Islamists. And, listed on the PYD site. This is the only place I've ever seen his name. The specific reference to Hazim is curious since they were largely wiped out by Al Nursa. Prior to that, they were one of the groups to get U.S. TOW missiles.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levant_Front
Commentary about this front has been "it's all the rebels in Aleppo except the jihadis"
It's really very weird for
It's really very weird for someone presumably influential in Levant Front to be mouthing Tev-Dem's program. A cynic would say its because Tev-Dem's program is so meaningless, even a coalition of "moderate" Islamists and "moderate" secular U.S./Qatari proxies could get behind it. An optimist might say that the shared defense of certain neighborhoods in Aleppo against the atrocities of the Ba'ath (which, body count wise, is as bad or worse than Daesh), against Daesh and the multi-ethnic outreach PYD has been doing brought Arabs rebels who were previously skeptical of the PYD/YPG/Tev-Dem into considering their program seriously. The YPG seems to have treated Arab refugees in Aleppo right. A middle position might be that these statements are atleast lip service that Levant Front will respect Rojava democratic autonomy for now and perhaps after the defeat of Assad. It may be that all of these are true, depending on who is saying it.
It certainly is a change in situation from when the FSA executed the military commander of the YPG in Aleppo.
Here is an article shared by the usually pro-KCK KurdishQuestion from Green Left Weekly that contrasts the YPG/YPJ from Levant Front, making the argument is worthy of "Green Left" support and that the Levant Front is not.
Syria: Why Rojava is Different, 2/6/2015
That last bit about the YPG/YPJ being more successful than Levant Front, Hazzm and Al-Nursa combined is arguably true. Aleppo is the largest city and the YPG has held its neighborhoods and its probably the most peaceful part of the city, further the population of its neighborhood swelled because of its security and it has taken in an ethnically diverse population. Al-Hasakah and Qamishli were the 8th and 9th largest cities in Syria before the war and they are in the Cizre canton (the "capitol of Rojava"), they have grown as well through refugees. The YPG has some 45,000 soldiers.
Hazzm was thought to be destroyed by Al-Nursa is is supposedly down to 400 soldiers. All the groups making up the Levant Front are considerably smaller than the YPG with the exception of the Islamic Front... but supposedly ONLY the Aleppo section of the Islamic Front is part of Levant Front. However, its also described as virtually defunct.
It maybe the Levant Front only really exists because different rebel groups were getting too small to operate on their own and they have teamed up together for survival against the Ba'ath; and the YPG happens to be the next biggest game in town and seems to have held to its position on incorporating Arabs.
The Levant Front: Can Aleppo’s Rebels Unite?12/26/2014
At the start of this conflict, noone would have guessed that the YPG would have come to lead Aleppo.
Judicial Agreement in Aleppo
Judicial Agreement in Aleppo between Levant Front and YPG , 2/5/2015
Maybe more importantly, it acknowledges YPG control over not just Sheikh Maqsud but also the Ashrafiyah and Rusafah neighborhoods of Aleppo.
Flint, Our different takes on
Flint, Our different takes on the events on Syria/Rojava aside I appreciate the flow of information you are providing - especially the 'extracts' as I don't always have time to dig into all the fuller linked texts - and as I'm taking a short break I will try to catch up with all this later.
Quote: In the past two days,
Aleppo Siege Back in the Spotlight Ahead of Renewed Push to Freeze Hostilities, 2/17/2015
In the 8th edition of Islamic
IS Condemns Islamic Rebel Alliance with Kurds in Aleppo, 4/9/2015
Sharing this more because its Daesh confirmation of YPG and Levant Front cooperation and mention of that judicial agreement. Its Daesh's propaganda, so its not a very reliable source.
Quote: On the plans to secure
The Administration of the Local Council in Azaz, 3/21/2015
Al-Monitor: In a previous
Syrian Kurd leader urges Turkey to join fight against jihadists, 5/6/2014
Flint FYI Green Left Weekly
Flint FYI Green Left Weekly is the paper of a weird ex-Trot group in Australia the Democratic Socialist Party aka Socialist Alliance. They love national liberation to an extent that would make even Connor blush including supporting the "left wing" of the Croatian fascist exiles here in Australia in 70s and 80s.
Levant Front dissolved.
Levant Front dissolved. Apparently the Islamists quit the group.
We'll have to see if the YPG picks up the secularists involved.
Key Islamist group Shamiya Front resolves itself