Latest news on President Jacques Chirac's speech to the nation on the CPE, and responses to it.
Update: A full text of the speech has been translated here.
22h32
Force Ouvrier have said that the five main trade unions shall meet again on April 5th, after the day of strikes and protests on April 4th.
Several hundred have been protesting peacefully in the Place de la Bastille and Place de la Concorde.
Responses to Chirac's speech
- The Secretary-General of the CGT union, Bernard Thibault: "[I] will not discuss amendments of the CPE" with the Prime Minister, like Jacques Chirac had proposed to the two sides of industry in his speech.
- Greens- "incredible declaration".
- Jean-Claude Mailly, Secretary-General of FO- "incomprehensible" and "not acceptable... Our will be on April 4th, with the strikes and the demonstrations which we still carry out, obviously".
- Karl Stoeckel of UNL high school students - "a provocation... It would have been necessary to withdraw the CPE to open a space of dialogue"
- Jacques Voisin of the CFTC - "ambiguous and unclear"
21h18
Francois Bayrou, of rival centre right party the UDF, has said that "it is the first time in history, that I know of, when one promulgates a law by asking that it is not applied. To avoid the crisis, Chirac has taken the risk of ridicule"
Chirac is coming in for criticism for making what some see an ambiguous statement.
Sarkozy: "a wise decision, conformity with the wishes of the immense majority of UMP Members of Parliament"
20h41
More from the Chirac speach:
He "believed the First Employment Contract (CPE) can be an effective tool for employment." He said he had also "heard the anxieties that are being expressed by many young people and their parents."
"That is why I have asked the government to immediately prepare two modifications to the law on the points which have been at the heart of the debate. The (trial) period of two years shall be reduced to one year. And if the contract is broken, the right of the young worker to know the reasons shall be written into the new law,"
20h36
Chirac made a "wise decision" on the CPE, says Nicolas Sarkozy.
20h34
The secretary-general of trade union Force Ouvrier, Jean-Claude Mailly, considered "incomprehensible" and "unacceptable", the contents of the speech of President Jacques Chirac.
20h28
CGT- 4th of April strike to go ahead
20h25
French President Jacques Chirac has spoken in a nine minute address to the nation:
- He accepts the law, he will sign it into being.
- He will insist upon 2 major modifications - the employer must give a reason as to the reason for the termination of the contract. Previously the employer did not need to justify a sacking. And, "the probation period of the CPE will be reduced to one year" from two years.
- He spoke of the need for a debate in the country, around the present value of a university degree, and the links between university and the jobs market. He insisted that he understood the fears of young people, speaking of being waging 'war with on unemployment. He spoke of 'precarite', or job precariosnous and insecurity, of the fears young people had of labour market casualisation.
Fundamentally - he is backing the law, but with two modifications.
Chirac in quotes:
- "I understand the refusal of precariousness"
- "with the CPE, Domenica de Villepin wanted to offer new opportunities for young people"
- "it is time to untie the situation [break the stalemate]
Meanwhile hundreds have gathered in the Place de la Bastille.
Comments
papidan March 31st, 2006 |
papidan
March 31st, 2006 | 6:53 pm
a completely absurd speech:
he “understands” that young people are worried but signs the law anyway.
he signs the law but asks the employers not to use it right now. they have to wait that the law is modified. What is the point of signing the law then?
He asks for a negociation with the trade unions, but has already decided what will be the modifications!
the employer will have to give a reason for the dismissal, which is totally different than to justify it. There are very specific rules about dismissals, but he did not say that they would be applied for the CPE.
LEGBA March 31st, 2006 |
LEGBA
March 31st, 2006 | 7:09 pm
Yeah, I’m reading the text of it now and it seems completely riddled with inconsistences. And these “modifications” seem absolutely irrelevant to anything, even as far as they actually modify the law…